Advertisement

Sustainable Forest Management from Policy to Landscape, and Back Again: A Case Study in the Ukrainian Carpathian Mountains

  • Marine ElbakidzeEmail author
  • Per Angelstam
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

To implement sustainable forest management (SFM) policies in actual landscapes, policy actors and managers exercising governance, and different forest stakeholders need to be provided with empirical information of how different SFM dimensions are understood and develop locally. Focusing on the state and trends of SFM implementation in the Ukrainian Carpathians we analyze the barriers and bridges at multiple levels from the national to the local management unit. First, we review the national Ukrainian policies relevant for forest and woodland landscapes, and describe how the involved stakeholders implement policies top–down. Using the Skole district in the Carpathian Mountains as a case study, we then describe the status of SFM dimensions, and evaluate the implementation process bottom–up. Interviews and analyses of official statistics show that three types of gaps need to be bridged: (1) a policy creation gap between the local level situation and ecological, economic and socio–cultural needs at the national and regional levels; (2) a policy implementation gap between the official definition of SFM, and how its different criteria and objectives are understood by forest stakeholders; (3) a knowledge gap between the need of a holistic transdisciplinary approach for SFM implementation, and the present sectoral approach to governance of forest landscapes and disciplinary research. Ways of bridging these gaps are capacity building, introducing arenas for collaboration, and applying a zoning approach at multiple scales to satisfy economic, ecological and socio–cultural dimension of SFM.

Keywords

Forest Management Forest Resource Forest Policy Sustainable Forest Management Carpathian Mountain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper was initially developed as an outcome of the COST action E25 (European network for long-term forest ecosystem and landscape research). We are grateful for the support provided through Folke Andersson to take part in this network. Financial support was provided to Per Angelstam from “Stiftelsen Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs Minnesfond”. Robert Axelsson, Marius Lazdinis, Maria Nijnik and Camilla Sandström provided valuable comments on the manuscript. Special thanks to Maksym Polyakov and Tim Sidor for their constructive comments and edits of the manuscript.

References

  1. Angelstam P, Mikusinski G, Rönnbäck B-I, Östman A, Lazdinis M, Roberge J-M, Arnberg W, Olsson J (2003) Two-dimensional gap analysis: a tool for efficient conservation planning and biodiversity policy implementation. Ambio 33(8):527–534Google Scholar
  2. Angelstam P, Dönz-Breuss M, Roberge J-M (eds) (2004a) Targets and tools for the maintenance of forest biodiversity. Ecol Bull 51:427–454Google Scholar
  3. Angelstam P, Kuuluvainen T (2004) Boreal forest disturbance regimes, successional dynamics and landscape structures—a European perspective. Ecol Bull 51:117–136Google Scholar
  4. Angelstam P, Roberge J-M, Lõhmus A, Bergmanis M, Brazaitis G, Dönz-Breuss M, Edenius L, Kosinski Z, Kurlavicius P, Lārmanis V, Lūkins M, Mikusinski G, Račinskis E, Strazds M, Tryjanowski P (2004b) Habitat modelling as a tool for landscape-scale conservation—a review of parameters for focal forest birds. Ecol Bull 51:427–453Google Scholar
  5. Angelstam P, Kapylova E, Korn H, Lazdinis M, Sayer JA, Teplyakov V, Törnblom J (2005) Changing forest values in Europe. In: Sayer JA, Maginnis S (eds) Forests in landscapes. Ecosystem approaches to sustainability. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Angelstam P (2006) Maintaining cultural and natural biodiversity in Europe’s economic centre and periphery. In: Agnoletti M (ed) The conservation of cultural landscapes. CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Anon (1983) Boikivshchyna, istoryko-etnografichne doslidzhennia. Naukova dumka, KievGoogle Scholar
  8. Anon (2003a) Litopys pryrody natsyonalnogo pryrodnogo parku Skolivsky Beskydy. Unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar
  9. Anon (2003b) Carpathian convention: framework convention on the protection and sustainable use of the Carpathians. http://mail.menr.gov.ua/publ/bernconven/docum/index.html. Accessed 20 Oct 2010
  10. Anon (2004) Statystichnyy dovidnyk po L’vivs’kiy oblasti. Naukova dumka, LvivGoogle Scholar
  11. Anon (2006) Lisovyi kodeks Ykrainy. http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3852-12. Accessed 10 May 2010
  12. Anon (2009) Programa Lisy Ykrainy 2010–2015. http://www.lesovod.org.ua/node/4663. Accessed 30 Sept 2012
  13. Balashenko S, Laevskaya E, Makarova T, Lizgaro V, Shcherbina A, Grigoriev E, Tarasenko V (2005) Review of Dnipro basin biodiversity legislation ensuring public participation and support. Water Qual Res J Can 6:68–82Google Scholar
  14. Besseau P, Dansou K, Johnson F (2002) The international model forest network (IMFN): elements of success. For Chron 78:648–654Google Scholar
  15. Bihun Yu (2005) Principles of SFM in the framework of regional economic development. Vistnyk Lvivs’kogo Universytetu Ser Geogr 32:19–32Google Scholar
  16. Boyle M, Kay J, Pond B (2001) Monitoring in support of policy: an adaptive ecosystem approach. In: Munn T (ed) Encyclopedia of global environmental change. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Buksha I (2004) Forestry sector of Ukraine in transition to market economy. Ukrainian Research Institute of Forestry and Forest Melioration. http://www.unece.org/trade/timber. Accessed 10 March 2011
  18. Clark TW (2002) The policy process. A practical guide for natural resource professionals. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  19. Elbakidze M, Angelstam P (2007) Implementing sustainable forest management in Ukraine’s Carpathian Mountains: the role of traditional village systems. For Ecol Manag 249:28–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elbakidze M, Angelstam P, Sandström C, Axelsson R (2010) Multi-stakeholder collaboration in Russian and Swedish Model Forest initiatives: adaptive governance towards sustainable forest management? Ecol Soc 15(2):14Google Scholar
  21. Fries C, Johansson O, Pettersson B, Simonsson P (1997) Silvicultural models to maintain and re-store natural stand structures in Swedish boreal forests. For Ecol Manag 94:89–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hajda Y (1998) Turkivshchyna: pryroda i liudy. Ranok, UzhhorodGoogle Scholar
  23. Head L (2000) Cultural landscapes and environmental change. Arnold, London/Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Hensiruk S (1964) Lisy Ukrajinskykh Karpat ta jikh vykorystannia. Naukova dumka, KyivGoogle Scholar
  25. Hensiruk S (1992) Lisy. Naukova dumka, KyivGoogle Scholar
  26. Hensiruk S, Nijnik M, Kopiy L (1998) Lisy Zahidnogo regionu Ukrayny. Naukove tovarustvo Shevchenka, LvivGoogle Scholar
  27. Higman S, Bass S, Judd N, Mayers J, Nussbaum R (1999) The sustainable forestry handbook. Earthscan Publications Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Holubetst M et al (1983) Biogeonotstycheskyy pokrov Beskyd i ego dimanicheskie tendentsii. Naukova dumka, KievGoogle Scholar
  29. Innes JL, Nitschke CR (2005) The application of forest zoning as an alternative to multiple-use forestry. In: Innes JL, Hoen HF, Hickey G (eds) Forestry and environmental change: socioeconomic and political dimensions. Report No. 5 of the IUFRO task force on environmental change. CABI Publishing, OxfordshireGoogle Scholar
  30. Kallas A (2000) The Estonia forest sector in transition: institutions at work. Interim Report IR-00-073. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, LaxenburgGoogle Scholar
  31. Kalynovych N, Sytnyk O (2003) Istorija zaselennia Ukrajinskykh Karpat. In: Ekolohichni problemy Karpatskoho regionu. Pr Nauk Tov Shevchenka 9:44–53Google Scholar
  32. Kennedy JJ, Ward TJ, Glueck P (2001) Evolving forestry and rural development: beliefs at mid-point and close of the twentiethth century. For Policy Econ 3:81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kimmins H (1997) Forest ecology. A foundation for sustainable management, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  34. Krott M, Tikkanen I, Petrov A, Tunytsya Y, Zheliba Y, Sasse V, Rykowina I, Tunytsya T (2000) Policies for sustainable forestry in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine. Koninlijke Brill NV, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  35. Levintanous A (2002) Russia—forest policy development and related institutional changes in the transition period. In: Forests and forestry in Central and Eastern European countries. The transition process and challenges ahead. Ministerial Conference for the Protection of Forests in Europe (MCPFE), ViennaGoogle Scholar
  36. Lindenmayer DB, Franklin JF (2002) Conserving forest biodiversity. A comprehensive multiscaled approach. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  37. Manfredo MJ et al (eds) (2004) Society and natural resources. A summary of knowledge. Modern Litho, JeffersonGoogle Scholar
  38. Mayer H (1984) Wälder Europas. Gustav Fischer Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  39. Mayers J, Bass S (1999) Policy that works for forests and people. Series overview. International Institute for Environment and Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. MCPFE (2003) Documents adopted at the fourth ministerial conference on the protection of forests in Europe, Vienna, 28–30 April 2003Google Scholar
  41. Mikusiński G, Angelstam P (1998) Economic geography, forest distribution and woodpecker diversity in central Europe. Conserv Biol 12:200–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mikusinski G, Angelstam P, Sporrong U (2003) Distribution of deciduous stands in villages located in coniferous forest landscapes in Sweden. Ambio 33(8):520–526Google Scholar
  43. MCPFE (1993) Resolution H1General guidelines for the sustainable management of forests in Europe. In: Second ministerial conference on the protection of forests in Europe. Helsinki, Finland, 16–17 June 1993. http://www.mcpfe.org. Accessed 22 Feb 2010
  44. MCPFE (1995) Pan-European criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management. Annex 1 of the Resolution 1, Lisbon. http://www.mcpfe.org. Accessed 22 Feb 2010
  45. MCPFE (2001) Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management of the MCPFE. International expert meeting on monitoring, assessment and reporting on the progress towards Sustainable Forest Management. Yokohama, Japan, 5–8 November 2001. http://www.mcpfe.org. Accessed 22 Feb 2010
  46. MCPFE (2007) Fifth ministerial conference on the protection of forests in Europe. In: Conference proceedings. Warsaw, Poland, 5–7 November 2007. http://www.mcpfe.org. Accessed 22 Feb 2010
  47. Nijnik M, Oskam A (2004) Governance in Ukrainian forestry: trends, impacts and remedies. Agric Res Gov Ecol 3:116–133Google Scholar
  48. Nijnik M, van Kooten CG (2006) Forestry in the Ukraine: the road ahead? Reply. For Policy Econ 8(1):6–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nilsson S (2002) Scenarios and forest policy responses. In: IUFRO symposium “Forest research—challenges and concepts in a changing world”, Occasional Paper, 16Google Scholar
  50. Nilsson S (2005) Experiences of policy reforms of the forest sector in transition and other countries. For Policy Econ 7:831–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Opelz M (2004) Towards a Carpathian Network of protected areas. Final report. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  52. Pavliuk S (ed) (1996) Skolivshchina. Institute of Regional Studies, LvivGoogle Scholar
  53. Peterken G (1996) Natural woodland: ecology and conservation in northern temperate regions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  54. Polyakov M, Sydor T (2006) Forestry in the Ukraine: the road ahead? Comment. For Policy Econ 8(1):1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Popkov M, Polyakova L, Storozuk V, Kyryluk S (2001) Osnovnye resultaty i tendentsii raszitiya lesnogo sectora Ukrainy v 1991–2000. Ukrainian–Sweden Project, KievGoogle Scholar
  56. Portenko K (1958) Pozvonochnye Karpat. Nauchnaya mysl, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  57. Pugachevsky A, Tkach V, Smirnov S (2005) Analysis of forestry use and management practices in the context of landscape and biodiversity protection in the Dnipro Basin. Water Qual Res J Can 6:54–67Google Scholar
  58. Raiser M (1997) Informal institutions, social capital and economic transition: reflections on a neglected dimension. Working Paper 25, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. Rametsteiner E, Mayer P (2004) SFM and Pan-European forest policy. Ecol Bull 51:51–57Google Scholar
  60. Salim E, Ullsten O (1999) Our forests, our future. Report of the world commission on forests and sustainable development. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  61. Solberg B, Rykowski K (2000) Institutional and legal framework for forest policies in the ECA region and selected OECD countries—a comparative analysis. Forest policy review and strategy development: analytical studies/issues paper. The World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  62. Synyakevych I, Soloviy I (2002) Modern forest policy problems in changing society. In: Scientific papers of agricultural university of Poznan. Forestry 5:87–95Google Scholar
  63. Synyakevych I (2004) Ecologichna i lisova polityka. ZUKTS, LvivGoogle Scholar
  64. Synyakevych I (2005) Lisova polityka. ZUKTS, LvivGoogle Scholar
  65. Szaro R, Angelstam P, Sheil D (2005) Information needs for ecosystem forestry. In: Sayer JA, Maginnis S (eds) Forests in landscapes. Ecosystem approaches to sustainability. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  66. Trokhimchuk S (1968) Zmina landshaftiv Stryjsko-Sanskoji Verkhovyny v Ukrajinskykh Karpatakh za istorychnyj chas. Rukopys dysertatsiji, LvivGoogle Scholar
  67. Turnock D (2002) Ecoregion-based conservation in the Carpathians and the land-use implications. Land Use Policy 19:47–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Uhnovskyy I (2003) Lisove gospodarstvo v Ukrayni: strategia rozvytku. Mizsvidomcha rada z pytan’ rozbytku prodyktyvnyh syl, KievGoogle Scholar
  69. Webster R, Holt S, Avis C (eds) (2001) The status of the Carpathians. A report developed as a part of the Carpathian Ecoregion Initiative. WWF, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  70. World Bank (2002) Transition. The first ten years. Analysis and lessons for Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. The World Bank, WashingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zibtsev S, Kaletnik M, Savuschik M (2004) Forests and forestry of Ukraine in the transition period. In: Proceedings of the FAO/Austria expert meeting on environmentally sound forest operations for country. http://dklg.kmu.gov.ua. Accessed 29 May 2011

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School for Forest ManagementSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesSkinnskattebergSweden

Personalised recommendations