Low Power Wireless Buoy Platform for Environmental Monitoring

  • Arne Sieber
  • Juergen Markert
  • Christian Woegerer
  • Michele Cocco
  • Matthias F. Wagner
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 64)


A novel sensor buoy platform was developed for detailed environmental monitoring of coastal areas. Using many buoys in a mesh network on low power ZigBee basis allows dramatic reduction of the overall power consumption, enabling an autonomous operation on a single battery set over 3y. Each buoy acts as sensor node but also as router forwarding messages from neighbor buoys to a centralized server. Thus special attention had to be directed to network synchronization and the handling of processor sleep states. One –wire temperature sensors were used for temperate profiling. Moreover the platform is equipped with several analog and digital inputs allowing the connection of additional sensor and sensor systems. The fist buoy network was designed based on 2.5 GHz RF modules (Atmels ATmega1281 together with the AVR Z-Link AT86RF230). According the specifications of the manufacturer under perfect conditions the maximum transmission range is about 4km. A maximum buoy to buoy distance of approximately 400m could be achieved. Instead of 2.5 GHz technology the final version of the buoys was then equipped with 868 MHz transceivers. A buoy to buoy distance of 3km was possible.


Wireless Sensor Network Mesh Network Bottlenose Dolphin Sleep Mode Mooring Line 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hutchinson, G.E.: Concluding remarks, Cold Spring Harbor Symposium. Quant. Biol. 22, 415 (1957)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Giuliani, S., Lamberti, V.C., Sonni, C., Pellegrini, D.: Mucilage impact on gorgonians in the Tyrrhenian sea. Science of The Total Environment 353, 340–349 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Greco, M., Gini, F., Verrazzani, L.: Analysis and modeling of the acoustic signals emitted by the Mediterranean bottlenose dolphins. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on “Signal Processing and Information Technology”, ISSPIT 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Janik, V.M., Van Parijs, S., Thompson, P.M.: A two-dimensional acoustic localization system for marine mammals. Marine Mammal Science 16, 437–447 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Polastre, J., Szewczyk, R., Mainwaring, A., Culler, D., Anderson, J.: Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks for Habitat Monitoring. Wireless Sensor Networks. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sundararaman, B., Buy, U., Kshemkalyani, A.D.: Clock Synchronization for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey, Department of Computer Science. University of Illinois, Chicago March 22 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arne Sieber
    • 1
    • 2
  • Juergen Markert
    • 3
  • Christian Woegerer
    • 4
  • Michele Cocco
    • 5
  • Matthias F. Wagner
    • 3
  1. 1.IMEGOGothenburgSweden
  2. 2.SP Marine ABGothenburgSweden
  3. 3.University of Applied SciencesFrankfurtGermany
  4. 4.Profactor GmbHSeibersdorfAustria
  5. 5.Tuscan Archipelago National Park, Isle of ElbaItaly

Personalised recommendations