Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bildgebende Verfahren: Früherkennung und Diagnostik

  • Chapter
Mammakarzinom Interdisziplinär

  • 2577 Accesses

Zusamenfassung

Das wichtigste bildgebende Verfahren in der Mammadiagnostik ist die Mammographie, sei es zur Früherkennung von Mammakarzinomen, zur Differenzierung benigner und maligner Läsionen, zum präoperativen Staging oder im Rahmen der Nachsorge. Andere Verfahren wie Ultraschall, MR-Mammographie, Galaktographie oder transkutane Biopsie kommen additiv zum Einsatz. Das PETCT ist Gegenstand klinischer Forschung im Rahmen des Stagings von Mammakarzinomen. Alle übrigen Verfahren spielen in der klinischen Routine keine Rolle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Adler LP, Faulhaber PF, Schnur KC, Al-Kasi NL, Shenk RR (1997) Axillary lymh node metastases: screening with [F-18]2-deoxy-2-fluoro-Dglucose (FDG) PET. Radiology 203(2): 223–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert US, Altland H, Duda V et al. (2008) Kurzfassung der aktualisierten Stufe-3-Leitlinie Brustkrebsfrüherkennung in Deutschland 2008.www.uni-duesseldorf/AWM F/

    Google Scholar 

  • Avril N, Dose J, Jänicke F et al. (1996) Metabolic characterization of breast tumors with positron emission tomography using F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose. J Clin Oncology 14: 1848–1857

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baker LH (1982) Breast Cancer Detection Project: five-year summary report. CA Cancer J Clin 32: 194–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC (1992) Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 184: 613–617

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brem RF, Behrndt VS, Sanow L, Gatewood OMB (1999) Atypical ductal hyperplasia: histologic underestimation of carcinoma in tissue harvested from impalpable breast lesions using 11-Gauge stereotactically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. Am J Roentgenol 172: 1405–1407 Bundesministerium der Justiz: Verordnung über den Schutz vor Schäden durch Röntgenstrahlen (Röntgenverordnung — RöV). www. gesetze-im-internet.de

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz LK, Wiley EL, Venta LA (1999) Are malignant cells displaced by large-gauge needle core biopsy of the breast? Am J Roentgenol 173: 1303–1313

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diebold T, Jacobi V, Krapfl E et al. (2003) Wertigkeit der stereotaktischen 11 G-Vakuumbiopsie zur Abklärung von Befunden der Kategorie BI-RADS™ IV in der Mammographie. RöFo 175: 489–494

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer U, Kopkas L, Grabbe E (1999) Breast Carcinoma: Effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR Imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213: 881–888

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer U, von Heyden D, Vosshenrich R, Vieweg I, Grabbe E (1993) Signalverhalten maligner und benigner Läsionen in der dynamischen 2D-MRT der Mamma. Fortschr Röntgenstr 158: 287–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer U, Vosshenrich R, Probst A, Burchhardt H, Grabbe E (1994) Präoperative MR-Mammographie bei bekanntem Mammakarzinom. Sinnvolle Mehrinformation oder sinnloser Mehraufwand ? Fortschr Röntgenstr 161: 300–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer U, Westerhof JP, Brinck U, Korabiowska M, Schauer A, Grabbe F (1996) Das duktale In-situ-Karzinom in der dynamischen MR-Mammographie bei 1,5 T. Fortschr Röntgenstr 164: 290–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman AJ (1996) Positron emission tomography in the clinical evaluation of metastatic cancer. J Clin Oncology 14: 691–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywang SH, Hahn D, Schmidt H, Krischke I, Eiermann W, Bassermann R, Lissner J (1986) MR imaging of the breast using Gd-DTPA. J Comput Assist Tomogr 10: 199–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schreer I, Decker T, Böcker W (2003) Interdisciplinary consensus on the use and technique of vacuum assisted stereotactic breast biopsy. Eur J Radiol 47: 232–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hickman PF, Moore NR, Shepstone BJ (1994) The indeterminate breast mass: assessment using contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 67: 14–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FA Jr, Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ (1999) Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow up. Radiology 210: 799–805

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser (1993) MR-Mammographie. Radiologe 33: 292–298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kreienberg R, Kopp I, Albert U et al. (2008) Interdisziplinäre S-3-Leitliniefür die Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Mammakarzinoms. www. uni-duesseldorf.de/AWMF/

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee CH, Philpotts LE, Horvath LJ, Tocino I (1999) Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false negative rate. Radiology 212: 189–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman L, Vulo M, Dershaw DD et al. (1999b) Epithelial displacement after stereotactic 11-Gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Am J Roentgenol 172: 677–681

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman L, Zakowski MF, Avery S et al. (1999c) Complete percutaneous excision of infiltrating carcinoma at stereotactic breast biopsy: how can tumor size be assessed? Am J Roentgenol 173: 1315–1322

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lochmüller H, Baumgärtner M, Kessler M (1986) Radiologische Methoden in Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. In: Lissner J (Hrsg): Radiologie II. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart, S 451–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Madjar H, Münch S, Sauerbrei W, Bauer M, Schillinger H (1990) Differenzierte Mammadiagnostik durch CW-Doppler-Ultraschall. Radiologie 30: 193–197

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Kinkel K et al. (2008) Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. Eur Radiol 18: 1307–1318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moon WK, Im JG, Noh DY et al. (2000) Nonpalpable breast lesions: evaluation with power Doppler US and a microbubble contrast agent — initial experience. Radiology 217: 240–246

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Höldke B (2002) Information zum Mammographiescreening — vom Trugschluss zur Ent-Täuschung. Der Radiologe 4(42): 299–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitzsche EU, Hoh CK, Dalbohm M, Glaspy A, Phelps ME, Moser EA (1993) Ganzkörper-Positronen-Emissions-Tomographie beim Mammakarzinom. Fortschr Röntgenstr 158: 293–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pfarl G, Helbich TH (2002) Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADSR). Deutsche Version. Fortschr Röntgenstr 174: 921–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieber A, Nüssle K, Merkle E, Kreienberg R, Tomczak R, Brambs H-J (1999) MR-Mammography: Influence of menstrual cycle on the dynamic contrast enhancement of fibrocystic disease. Eur Radiol 9: 1107–1112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rieber A, Tomczak R, Mergo P, Wenzel V, Zeitler H, Brambs H-J (1997) Magnetic resonance mammography in the differential diagnosis of mastitis versus inflammatory carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomog 21: 128–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rieber A, Tomczak R, Rosenthal H, Görich J, Kreienberg R, Brambs H-J (1997) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: changes in sensitivity during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Br J Radiol 70: 452–458

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rieber A, Schramm K, Helms G et al. (2003) Breast-conserving surgery and autogenous tissue reconstruction in patients with breast cancer: efficacy of MRI of the breast in the detection of recurrent disease. Eur Radiol 13: 780–787

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rostom AY, Powe J, Kandil A et al. (1999) Positon emission tomography in breast cancer: a clincopathological correlation of results. Br J Radiol 72: 1064–1068

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz K-D, Albert U-S (2003) Stufe-3-Leitlinie Brustkrebs-Früherkennung in Deutschland. Zuckschwerdt, München Wien New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sittek H, Kessler M, Heuck AF et al. (1996) Dynamische MR-Mammographie: Zur Differenzierung unterschiedlicher Formen der Mastopathie geeignet? Fortschr Röntgenstr 165: 59–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Som P, Atkins HL, Bandoypadhyay D et al. (1980) A fluorinated glucose analog, 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D glucose (F-18): nontoxic tracere for rapid tumor detection. J Nucl Med 21: 670–675

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soo MS, Baker JA, Rosen EL, Vo TT (2002) Sonographically guided biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications of the breast: a pilot study. Am J Roentgenol 178: 1007–1015

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabár L, Yen M, Vitak B, Chen HAT, Smith RA, Duffy SW (2003) Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening. The Lancet 361: 1405–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Won B, Reynolds HE, Lazaridis CL, Jackson VP (1999) Stereotactic biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using an 11-Gauge vacuum-assisted device: persistent underestimation of disease. Am J Roentgenol 173: 227–229

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zonderland HM, Coerkamp EG, Hermans J, van de Vijer MJ, van Voorthuisen Ad E (1999) Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography. Radiology 213: 413–422

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe Universitätsklinikum, Ulm Prittwitzstraße43, 89075, Ulm

    Prof. Dr.med. Andrea Rieber-Brambs

  2. Klinikum Neuperlach, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Oskar-Maria-Graf-Ring 51, 81737, München

    Prof. Dr.med. Hans-Jürgen Brambs

  3. Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Steinhövelstraße9, 89075, Ulm

    Prof. Dr.med. Rolf Kreienberg

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr.med. Andrea Rieber-Brambs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr.med. Hans-Jürgen Brambs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Prof. Dr.med. Rolf Kreienberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rieber-Brambs, A., Brambs, HJ., Kreienberg, R. (2010). Bildgebende Verfahren: Früherkennung und Diagnostik. In: Mammakarzinom Interdisziplinär. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12681-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12681-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12680-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12681-9

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation