Advertisement

Gestural Interfaces for Elderly Users: Help or Hindrance?

  • Christian Stößel
  • Hartmut Wandke
  • Lucienne Blessing
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5934)

Abstract

In this paper we investigate whether finger gesture input is a suitable input method, especially for older users (60+) with respect to age-related changes in sensory, cognitive and motor abilities. We present a study in which we compare a group of older users to a younger user group on a set of 42 different finger gestures on measures of speed and accuracy. The size and the complexity of the gestures varied systematically in order to find out how these factors interact with age on gesture performance. The results showed that older users are a little slower, but not necessarily less accurate than younger users, even on smaller screen sizes, and across different levels of gesture complexity. This indicates that gesture-based interaction could be a suitable input method for older adults. At least not a hindrance - maybe even a help.

Keywords

Gestural interfaces aging psychology human factors 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schieber, F.: Human factors and aging: Identifying and compensating for age-related deficits in sensory and cognitive function. In: Charness, N., Schaie, K. (eds.) Impact of technology on successful aging, pp. 42–84. Springer, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vercruyssen, M.: Movement control and speed of behaviour. In: Fisk, A.D., Rogers, W.A. (eds.) Human Factors and the Older Adult, pp. 55–86. Academic Press, San Diego (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schroeder, D.H., Salthouse, T.A.: Age-related effects on cognition between 20 and 50 years of age. Personality and Individual Differences 36, 393–404 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kurniawan, S.: Older people and mobile phones: A multi-method investigation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66(12), 889–901 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saffer, D.: Designing Gestural Interfaces, 1st edn. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Charness, N., Holley, P., Feddon, J., Jastrzembski, T.: Light pen use and practice minimize age and hand performance differences in pointing tasks. Hum. Factors 46(3), 373–384 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rogers, W.A., Fisk, A.D., McLaughlin, A.C., Pak, R.: Touch a screen or turn a knob: choosing the best device for the job. Hum. Factors 47(2), 271–288 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chaparro, A., Rogers, M., Fernandez, J., Bohan, M., Choi, S.D., Stumpfhauser, L.: Range of motion of the wrist: implications for designing computer input devices for the elderly. Disability & Rehabilitation 22(13), 633–637 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Walker, N., Philbin, D.A., Fisk, A.D.: Age-related differences in movement control: adjusting submovement structure to optimize performance. The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences 52(1), 40–52 (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smith, M.W., Sharit, J., Czaja, S.J.: Aging, motor control, and the performance of computer mouse tasks. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41, 389–396 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Microsoft Corporation: Application gestures and semantic behavior, http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms704830VS.85.aspx (retrieved, January 2009)
  12. 12.
    Apple Inc.: Multi-touch trackpad, http://www.apple.com/macbook/features.html (retrieved, January 2009)
  13. 13.
    Heuer, H.: On re-scaleability of force and time in aiming movements. Psychological Research 46(1), 73–86 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chaparro, A., Bohan, M., Fernandez, J., Choi, S.D., Kattel, B.: The impact of age on computer input device use: - psychological sciences. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 24, 503–513 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sutter, C., Müsseler, J.: User specific design of interfaces and interaction techniques: What do older computer users need? In: Universal Access in Human Computer Interaction. Coping with Diversity, pp. 1020–1029. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sülzenbrück, S., Hegele, M., Heuer, H., Rinkenauer, G.: Generalized slowing is not that general in older adults: Evidence from a tracing task. Occupational Ergonomics (2009) (in press)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Murata, A., Iwase, H.: Usability of touch-panel interfaces for older adults. Hum Factors 47(4), 767–776 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Stößel
    • 1
  • Hartmut Wandke
    • 2
  • Lucienne Blessing
    • 3
  1. 1.Zentrum für Mensch-Maschine-SystemeTechnische Universität Berlin 
  2. 2.Institut für PsychologieHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin 
  3. 3.Université de Luxembourg 

Personalised recommendations