Skip to main content

An Intentional Perspective on Enterprise Modeling

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intentional Perspectives on Information Systems Engineering

Abstract

Enterprise Modeling (EM) has two main purposes: (1) Developing the business, which entails developing business vision, strategies, redesigning the way the business operates, developing the supporting information systems, etc., and (2) ensuring the quality of the business where the focus is on sharing the knowledge about the business, its vision and the way it operates, and ensuring the acceptance of business decisions through committing the stakeholders to the decisions made. In addition, EM has also shown to be useful as a general tool for articulating, discussing, and solving organizational problems. Based on a number of case studies, interviews and observations this chapter defines what is required from EM when adopted for these purposes and intentions respectively. More precisely, it addresses the following types of requirements: documents and models required as input, models that should be developed, requirements on the modeling language, requirements on the modeling process, tool requirements and model quality requirements. The defined requirements are then discussed taking a specific EM method, Enterprise Knowledge Development (EKD) as example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that the quotations from this point onward are excerpts from the interviews. Full transcripts of the interviews are available from the authors on request.

References

  1. Bajec M, Krisper M (2005) A methodology and tool support for managing business rules in organisations. Info Systems 30(6):423–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bubenko JA Jr (1993) Extending the scope of information modelling. In: Proceedings of 4th international workshop on the deductive approach to information systems and databases, Lloret, Costa Brava (Catalonia), Department de Llenguatges i Sistemes Informatics, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Report de Recerca LSI/93-25, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bubenko JA Jr, Persson A, Stirna J (2001) User guide of the knowledge management approach using enterprise knowledge patterns, deliverable D3, IST Programme project Hypermedia and Pattern Based Knowledge Management for Smart Organisations, project no. IST-2000-28401, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bubenko JA Jr, Kirikova M (1999) Improving the quality of re-quirements specifications by enterprise modelling. In: Nilsson AG, Tolis C, Nellborn C (eds) Perspectives on business modelling. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carvallo JP, Franch X (2009) On the use of i* for architecting hybrid systems: a method and an evaluation report. In: Proceedings of PoEM 2009. LNBIP, vol 39. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 38–53

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carstensen A, Holmberg L Sandkuhl K (2008) Supporting collaboration in an extended enterprise with the connector view on enterprise models. In: Proceedings of PoEM 2008. LNBIP, vol 15. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 11–126

    Google Scholar 

  7. Castro J, Kolp M, Mylopoulos J, Tropos A (2001) A requirements-driven software development methodology. In: Proceedings of CAiSE 2001. LNCS, vol 2068. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 108–123

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dobson J, Blyth J, Strens R (1994) Organisational requirements definition for information technology. In: Proceedings of the international conference on requirements engineering 1994. Denver, CO

    Google Scholar 

  9. F3-Consortium (1994) F3 reference manual, ESPRIT III Project 6612, SISU, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fox MS, Chionglo JF, Fadel FG (1993) A common-sense model of the enterprise. In: Proceedings of the 2nd industrial engineering research conference, Institute for Industrial Engineers, Norcross, GA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johannesson P, Boman M, Bubenko J, Wangler B (1997) Conceptual modelling. Hoare CAR (series ed), Prentice Hall International Series in Computer Science, Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kardasis P, Loucopoulos P, Scott B, Filippidou D, Clarke R, Wangler B, Xini G (1998) The use of business knowledge modelling for knowledge discovery in the banking sector, IMACS-CSC’98, Athens, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krogstie J, Lillehagen F, Karlsen D, Ohren O, Strømseng K, Thue Lie F (2000) Extended enterprise methodology. Deliverable 2 in the EXTERNAL project. Det Norske Veritas AS, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  14. Larsson L, Segerberg R (2004) An approach for quality assurance in enterprise modelling. MSc Thesis, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, no. 04-22

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lillehagen F, Krogstie J (2002) Active knowledge models and enterprise knowledge management. In: Proceedings of the IFIP TC5/WG5.12 international conference on enterprise integration and modeling technique: enterprise inter- and intra-organizational integration: building international consensus. IFIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 236. Kluwer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Loucopoulos P, Kavakli V, Prekas N, Rolland C, Grosz G, Nurcan S (1997) Using the EKD approach: the modelling component. UMIST, Manchester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lundqvist M, Homquist E, Sandkuhl K, Seigerroth U, Strandesjö J (2009) Information demand context modeling for improved information flow: experiences and practices. In: Proceedings of PoEM 2009. LNBIP, vol 39. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 8–22

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moody DL, Shanks G (2003) Improving the quality of data models: empirical validation of a quality management framework. Info Systems 28(6):619–650

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Nilsson AG, Tolis C, Nellborn C (eds) (1999) Perspectives on business modelling: understanding and changing organizations. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  20. Persson A, Stirna J (2001) Why enterprise modelling? – an explorative study into current practice. In: Proceedings of CAiSE 2001. LNCS, vol 2068. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 465–468

    Google Scholar 

  21. Persson A (1997) Using the F3 enterprise model for specification of requirements – an initial experience report. In: Proceedings of international workshop on evaluation of modeling methods in systems analysis and design (EMMSAD), June 16–17, Barcelona, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  22. Persson A (2001) Enterprise modelling in practice: situational factors and their influence on adopting a participative approach. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, ISSN 1101-8526

    Google Scholar 

  23. Persson A (2008) The practice of participatory enterprise modelling – a competency perspective. In: Johannesson P, Söderström E (eds) Information systems engineering – from data analysis to process networks. Idea Group, Hershey, PA, pp 129–157

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Rolland C, Stirna J, Prekas N, Loucopoulos P, Persson A, Grosz G (2000) Evaluating a pattern approach as an aid for the development of organizational knowledge: an empirical study. In: Proceedings of the 12th conference on advanced information systems engineering (CAiSE). LNCS, vol 1789. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 176–191

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rolland C (2007) Capturing system intentionality with maps. In: Krogstie J et al (eds) Conceptual modelling in information systems engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 141–158

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Sandkuhl K, Stirna J (2008) Evaluation of task pattern use in web-based collaborative engineering. In: Proceedings of the 34th EUROMICRO conference on software engineering and advanced applications (SEAA), EUROMICRO, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stirna J (2001) The influence of intentional and situational factors on EM tool acquisition in organisations. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Royal Institute of Technology and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stirna J, Persson A (2009) Anti-patterns as a means of focusing on critical quality aspects in enterprise modeling. In: Halpin T et al (eds) Enterprise, business process and information systems modeling, proceedings of the 14th international conference EMMSAD 2009. LNBIP, vol 29. Springer, Berlin, pp 407–418

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stirna J, Persson A, Aggestam L (2006) Building knowledge repositories with enterprise modelling and patterns – from theory to practice. In: Proceedings of the 14th European conference on information systems (ECIS). Gothenburg, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stirna J, Persson A, Sandkuhl K (2007) Participative enterprise modelling: experiences and recommendations. In: Proceedings of CAiSE 2007. LNCS, vol 4495, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 546–560

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wangler B, Persson A (2002) Capturing collective intentionality in software development. In: Fujita H, Johannesson P (eds) New trends in software methodologies, tools and techniques. IOS, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp 262–270

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wangler B, Persson A, Söderström E (2001) Enterprise modeling for B2B integration. In: Proceedings of international conference on advances in infrastructure for electronic business, science, and education on the internet, L’Aquila, Italy (CD-ROM proceedings)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wangler B, Persson A, Johannesson P, Ekenberg L (2003) Bridging high-level enterprise models to implementation-oriented models. In: Fujita H, Johannesson P (eds) New trends in software methodologies, tools and techniques. IOS, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  34. Willars H (1988) Handbok i ABC-metoden. Plandata Strategi. Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yu E, Mylopoulos J (1994) From E-R to “A-R” – modelling strategic actor relationships for business process reengineering. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on the entity-relationship approach, Manchester, England

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janis Bubenko Jr. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bubenko Jr., J., Persson, A., Stirna, J. (2010). An Intentional Perspective on Enterprise Modeling. In: Nurcan, S., Salinesi, C., Souveyet, C., Ralyté, J. (eds) Intentional Perspectives on Information Systems Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12544-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12544-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12543-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12544-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics