Skip to main content

How an Agent Can Detect and Use Synchrony Parameter of Its Own Interaction with a Human?

  • Chapter
Development of Multimodal Interfaces: Active Listening and Synchrony

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5967))

Abstract

Synchrony is claimed by psychology as a crucial parameter of any social interaction: to give to human a feeling of natural interaction, a feeling of agency [17], an agent must be able to synchronise with this human on appropriate time [29] [11] [15] [16] [27]. In the following experiment, we show that synchrony can be more than a state to reach during interaction, it can be a useable cue of the human’s satisfaction and level of engagement concerning the ongoing interaction: the better is the interaction, the more synchronous with the agent is the human. We built an architecture that can acquire a human partner’s level of synchrony and use this parameter to adapt the agent behavior. This architecture detects temporal relation [1] existing between the actions of the agent and the actions of the human. We used this detected level of synchrony as reinforcement for learning [6]: the more constant the temporal relation between agent and human remains, the more positive is the reinforcement, conversely if the temporal relation varies above a threshold the reinforcement is negative. In a teaching task, this architecture enables naive humans to make the agent learn left-right associations just by the mean of intuitive interactions. The convergence of this learning reinforced by synchrony shows that synchrony conveys current information concerning human satisfaction and that we are able to extract and reuse this information to adapt the agent behavior appropriately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andry, P., Gaussier, P., Moga, S., Banquet, J.P., Nadel, J.: Learning and Communication in Imitation: An Autonomous Robot Perspective. IEEE transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A 31(5), 431–444 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andry, P., Moga, S., Gaussier, P., Revel, A., Nadel, J.: Imitation: learning and communication. In: The Sixth International Conference on Simulation for Adaptive Behavior SAB 2000, Paris, pp. 353–362. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Banquet, J.P., Gaussier, P., Dreher, J.C., Joulain, C., Revel, A., Günther, W.: Space-time, order, and hierarchy in fronto-hippocampal system: A neural basis of personality. In: Matthews, G. (ed.) Advances in Psychology, Amsterdam, vol. 124, pp. 123–189. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Condon, W.S.: An analysis of behavioral organisation. Sign Language Studies 13, 285–318 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Condon, W.S., Ogston, W.D.: Sound film analysis of normal and pathological behavior patterns. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 143, 338–347 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gaussier, P., Revel, A., Joulain, C., Zrehen, S.: Living in a partially structured environment: How to bypass the limitation of classical reinforcement techniques. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 20, 225–250 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gergely, G., Watson, J.: The social biofeedback model of parental affect-mirroring. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 77, 1181–1212 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gergely, G., Watson, J.: Early social-emotional development: Contingency perception and the social biofeedback model. In: Early social cognition, pp. 101–136. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grossberg, S., Merrill, J.W.L.: The hippocampus and cerebellum in adaptively timed learning, recognition, and movement. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8, 257–277 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lopresti-Goodman, S.M., Richardson, M.J., Silva, P.L., Schmidt, R.C.: Period basin of entrainment for unintentional visual coordination. Journal of Motor Behavior 40(1), 3–10 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Murray, L., Trevarthen, C.: Emotional regulation of interactions vetween two-month-olds and their mothers. Social perception in infants, 101–125 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nadel, J.: Imitation et communication entre jeunes enfants. Presse Universitaire de France, Paris (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nadel, J.: The functionnal use of imitation in preverbal infants and nonverbal children with autism. In: Meltzoff, A., Prinz, W. (eds.) The Imitative Mind: Developement, Evolution and Brain Bases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nadel, J.: Imitation and imitation recognition: their functional role in preverbal infants and nonverbal children with autism, pp. 42–62. Cambridge University Press, UK (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nadel, J., Camaioni, L.: New Perspectives in Early Communicative Development. Routledge, London (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nadel, J., Guerini, C., Peze, A., Rivet, C.: The evolving nature of imitation as a format for communication. In: Nadel, G., Butterworth, J. (eds.) Imitation in Infancy, pp. 209–234. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nadel, J., Prepin, K., Okanda, M.: Experiencing contigency and agency: first step toward self-understanding? In: Hauf, P. (ed.) Making Minds II: Special issue of Interaction Studies 6:3 2005, pp. 447–462. John Benjamins publishing company, Amsterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nadel, J., Tremblay-Leveau, H.: Early social cognition, chapter Early perception of social contingencies and interpersonal intentionality: dyadic and triadic paradigms, pp. 189–212. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Oullier, O., de Guzman, G.C., Jantzen, K.J., Lagarde, J., Kelso, J.A.S.: Social coordination dynamics: Measuring human bonding. Social Neuroscience 3(2), 178–192 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Oullier, O., Kelso, J.A.S.: Coordination from the perspective of Social Coordination Dynamics. In: Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pikovsky, A., Rosenblum, M., Kurths, J.: Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Pineda, J.A.: The functional significance of mu rhythms: Translating “seeing” and “hearing” into “doing”. Brain Research Reviews 50, 57–68 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Prepin, K., Revel, A.: Human-machine interaction as a model of machine-machine interaction: how to make machines interact as humans do. Advanced Robotics 21(15), 1709–1723 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Revel, A.: Contrôle d’un robot mobile autonome par approche neuro-mimétique. Doctorat de traitement de l’image et du signal, Université de Cergy-Pontoise (Novembre 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Richardson, M.J., Marsh, K.L., Isenhower, R.W., Goodman, J.R.L., Schmidt, R.C.: Rodking together: Dynamics of intentional and unitentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science 26, 867–891 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Richardson, M.J., Marsh, K.L., Schmidt, R.C.: Effects of visual and verbal interaction on unintentional interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31(1), 62–79 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Soussignan, R., Nadel, J., Canet, P., Girardin, P.: Sensitivity to social contingency and positive emotion in 2-month-olds. Infancy 10(2), 123–144 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tognoli, E., Lagarde, J., DeGuzman, G.C., Kelso, J.A.S.: The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tronick, E., Als, H., Adamson, L., Wise, S., Brazelton, T.B.: The infants’ response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interactions. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry (Psychiatrics) 17, 1–13 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prepin, K., Gaussier, P. (2010). How an Agent Can Detect and Use Synchrony Parameter of Its Own Interaction with a Human?. In: Esposito, A., Campbell, N., Vogel, C., Hussain, A., Nijholt, A. (eds) Development of Multimodal Interfaces: Active Listening and Synchrony. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5967. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12397-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12397-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12396-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12397-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics