Skip to main content

Textual Stylistic Variation: Choices, Genres and Individuals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Structure of Style

Abstract

This chapter argues for more informed target metrics for the statistical processing of stylistic variation in text collections. Much as operationalized relevance proved a useful goal to strive for in information retrieval, research in textual stylistics, whether application oriented or philologically inclined, needs goals formulated in terms of pertinence, relevance, and utility—notions that agree with reader experience of text. Differences readers are aware of are mostly based on utility—not on textual characteristics per se. Mostly, readers report stylistic differences in terms of genres. Genres, while vague and undefined, are well-established and talked about: very early on, readers learn to distinguish genres. This chapter discusses variation given by genre, and contrasts it to variation occasioned by individual choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The “private” type of factual verb expresses intellectual states such as belief and intellectual acts such as discovery. These states and acts are “private” in the sense that they are not observable… Examples of such verbs are: accept, anticipate … fear, feel, … think, understand [11]. Opinion expression is counted by adverbials such as clearly, offend, specious, poor, excellent. and argument expression by counting argumentative operators such as if … then, else, almost.

  2. 2.

    This experiment is reported in full in [7]. This section is an excerpt of that paper.

References

  1. Bakhtin MM (1986) The problem of speech genres. In: Emerson C, Holquist M (eds) Speech genres and other late essays (trans: McGee VW). University of Texas Press, Austin, TX

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biber D (1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Biber D (1989) A typology of English texts. Linguistics 27:3–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dewe J, Karlgren J, Bretan I (1998) Assembling a balanced corpus from the internet. In: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic conference of computational linguistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, January 1998

    Google Scholar 

  5. Enkvist NE (1973) Linguistic stylistics. Mouton, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  6. Herring SC, Scheidt LA, Bonus S, Wright E (2004) Bridging the gap: a genre analysis of weblogs. In: Proceedings of the 37th Hawai’i international conference on system sciences (HICSS-37), IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karlgren J, Eriksson G (2007) Authors, genre, and linguistic convention. In: Proceedings of the SIGIR workshop on plagiarism analysis, authorship identification, and near-duplicate detection, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  8. Katz S (1996) Distribution of content words and phrases in text and language modelling. Nat Lang Eng 2:15–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kullback S, Leibler RA (1951) On information and sufficiency. Ann Math Stat 22:79–86

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (1994) Genre repertoire: examining the structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Adm Sci Q 39:541–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Quirk R, Greenbaum S, Leech G, Svartvik J (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sarkar A, de Roeck A, Garthwaithe PH (2005) Term re-occurrence measures for analyzing style. In: Textual stylistics in information access. Papers from the workshop held in conjunction with the 28th international conference on research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR), Salvador, Brazil, August 2005

    Google Scholar 

  13. Swales J (1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tallentire D (1973) Towards an archive of lexical norms: a proposal. In: Aitken A, Bailey R, Hamilton-Smith N (eds) The computer and literary studies. Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh, TX

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vachek J (1975) Some remarks on functional dialects of standard languages. In: Ringbom H (ed) Style and text–-studies presented to Nils Erik Enkvist. Skriptor, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yates J, Orlikowski WJ (1992) Genres of organizational communication: a structurational approach to studying communication and media. Acad Manage Rev 17:299–326

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jussi Karlgren .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Karlgren, J. (2010). Textual Stylistic Variation: Choices, Genres and Individuals. In: Argamon, S., Burns, K., Dubnov, S. (eds) The Structure of Style. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12337-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12337-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12336-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12337-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics