Advertisement

Schools Taking Part in a Research Project Investigating Dioxins in Fish

  • Eldbjørg Sofie HeimstadEmail author
  • Gaute Grønstøl
  • Karl Torstein Hetland
  • Javier Martinez Alarcon
  • Charlotta Rylander
  • Espen Mariussen
Chapter
Part of the From Pole to Pole book series (POLE)

Abstract

The world is facing large environmental threats such as climate changes and spread of contaminants. Environmental awareness has become a part of our daily lives. In order to engage youth in environmental issues and ignite their interest for natural sciences, a scientifically based project was run where pupils participated in environmental research on dioxins in fish. Dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs were screened by the use of BDS DR CALUX® bioassay in 203 fish samples from 13 countries: Australia, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Iceland, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Norway, Poland and Sweden. The project was part of the Norwegian education and outreach initiative of the International Polar Year (IPY), and schools were invited to participate. Pupils from 54 schools followed a scientific protocol for fish sampling; they recorded and published important field and fish data through a Web interface and labelled, packed and shipped the samples for CALUX analysis. We conclude that collaboration between schools and research institutions was beneficial for both partners. The results showed that the majority of the fish samples had dioxin levels below the maximum limit set by the EU commission. These results would be difficult to obtain without the effort of the involved schools.

Keywords

Environmental research Schools Dioxins Fish Consumption 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to all the enthusiastic teachers who have arranged fishing field trips and inspired their pupils to do scientific work, to pose their own questions and to formulate their own answers and conclusions. Finally, we will say to the pupils: “We are impressed over your enthusiasm and skills as real scientific researchers, and hope to work with you in the future!” We are grateful for the financial support from the Research Council of Norway, project 18218: “A global network of schools investigating environmental pollutants in fish from the Arctic and worldwide”. We are very grateful for the help by Therese H. Nøst with the graphics. Thanks also to an anonymous referee for constructive input.

References

  1. Andresen MU, Høgmo N, Sandås A (2015) Learning from ESD-projects during the UN decade in Norway. In: Jucker J, Mathar R (eds) Schooling for sustainable development in Europe. Springer Scientfic Publishing, Dordrecht, pp 241–255Google Scholar
  2. Baeyens W et al (2007) PCBs and PCDD/FS in fish and fish products and their impact on the human body burden in Belgium. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 52:563–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borgå K, Fisk AT, Hargrave B, Hoekstra PF, Swackhamer D, Muir DC (2005) Bioaccumulation factors for PCBs revisited. Environ Sci Technol 39:4523–4532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Creilson JK, Pippin MR, Henderson BL, Ladd IH, Fishman J, Votápková D, Krpcová I (2008) Surface ozone measured at globe schools in the Czech Republic—a demonstration of the importance of student contribution to the larger science picture. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 89:505–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Heimstad ES, Herzke D (2004) Arctic POPs. Scientific report. NILU, OR 74/2004Google Scholar
  6. Heimstad ES, Herzke D, Endregard G, Hetland K (2003) Circumpolar investigation of brominated diphenyl ethers—connecting research and education. Organohalogen Comp 61:65–68Google Scholar
  7. Hites RA, Foran JA, Carpenter DO, Hamilton MC, Knuth BA, Schwager SJ (2004) Global assessment of organic contaminants in farmed salmon. Science 303:226–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Knain E, Kolstø SD (2011) Utforskende arbeidsmåter—en oversikt. In: Knain E, Kolstø SD (eds) Elever som forskere i naturfag. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, pp: 13–55 (In Norwegian)Google Scholar
  9. Murk AJ, Legler J, Denison MS, Giesy JP, van de Guchte C, Brouwer A (1996) Chemical-activated luciferase gene expression (CALUX): a novel in vitro bioassay for Ah receptor active compounds in sediments and pore water. Fundam Appl Toxicol 33:149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nali C, Lorenzini G (2007) Air quality survey carried out by schoolchildren: an innovative tool for urban planning. Environ Monit Assess 131:201–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schoeters G, Goyvaerts MP, Ooms DL et al (2004) The evaluation of dioxin and dioxin-like contaminants in selected food samples obtained from the Belgian market: comparison of TEQ measurements obtained through the CALUX bioassay with congener specific chemical analyses. Chemosphere 54:1289–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schwartz RS, Lederman NG, Crawford BA (2004) An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Sci Educ 88(4):610–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Van den Berg M, Birnbaum L, Bosveld AT, Brunström B, Cook P, Feeley M, Giesy JP, Hanberg A, Hasegawa R, Kennedy SW, Kubiak T, Larsen JC, van Leeuwen FX, Liem AK, Nolt C, Peterson RE, Poellinger L, Safe S, Schrenk D, Tillitt D, Tysklind M, Younes M, Waern F, Zacharewski T (1998) Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs for humans and wildlife. Environ Health Perspect 106:775–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. van Leeuwen SPJ, Leonards PEG, Traag WA, Hoogenboom LAP, de Boer J (2007) Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans and biphenyls in fish from the Netherlands: concentrations, profiles and comparison with DR CALUX® bioassay results. Anal Bioanal Chem 389:321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eldbjørg Sofie Heimstad
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gaute Grønstøl
    • 2
  • Karl Torstein Hetland
    • 3
  • Javier Martinez Alarcon
    • 4
  • Charlotta Rylander
    • 5
  • Espen Mariussen
    • 6
  1. 1.Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU)The Fram CentreTromsøNorway
  2. 2.Centre of Schools’ Science EducationUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
  3. 3.Norwegian Centre for Science EducationOsloNorway
  4. 4.Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU)KjellerNorway
  5. 5.Institute of Community MedicineUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway
  6. 6.Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI)KjellerNorway

Personalised recommendations