Skip to main content

Evaluation and User Preference Study on Spatial Diversity

  • Conference paper
Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5993))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Spatial diversity is a relatively new branch of research in the context of spatial information retrieval. Although the assumption that spatially diversified results may meet users’ needs better seems reasonable, there has been little hard evidence in the literature indicating so. In this paper, we will show the potentials of spatial diversity by not only the traditional evaluation metrics (precision and cluster recall), but also through a user preference study using Amazon Mechanical Turk. The encouraging results from the latter prove that users do have strong preference on spatially diversified results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alonso, O., Rose, D.E., Stewart, B.: Crowdsourcing for relevance evaluation. SIGIR Forum 42(2), 9–15 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arni, T., Tang, J., Sanderson, M., Clough, P.: Creating a test collection to evaluate diversity in image retrieval. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Beyond Binary Relevance: Preferences, Diversity, and Set-Level Judgments, held at SIGIR (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carbonell, J.G., Goldstein, J.: The use of mmr, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In: SIGIR 1998, pp. 335–336. ACM Press, Melbourne (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke, C.L.A., Kolla, M., Cormack, G.V., Vechtomova, O., Ashkan, A., Büttcher, S., MacKinnon, I.: Novelty and diversity in information retrieval evaluation. In: SIGIR 2008: Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pp. 659–666. ACM Press, Singapore (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Clough, P., Joho, H., Purves, R.: Judging the spatial relevance of documents for GIR. In: Lalmas, M., MacFarlane, A., Rüger, S.M., Tombros, A., Tsikrika, T., Yavlinsky, A. (eds.) ECIR 2006. LNCS, vol. 3936, pp. 548–552. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dakka, W., Ipeirotis, P.G.: Automatic extraction of useful facet hierarchies from text databases. In: IEEE 24th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2008), April 2008, pp. 466–475. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Deselaers, T., Gass, T., Dreuw, P., Ney, H.: Jointly optimising relevance and diversity in image retrieval. In: ACM International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval 2009 (CIVR 2009), Santorini, Greece, 08/07/2009, ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grubinger, M., Clough, P., Mller, H., Deselaers, T.: The iapr tc-12 benchmark: A new evaluation resource for visual information systems. In: International Workshop OntoImage 2006 Language Resources for Content-Based Image Retrieval held in conjunction with LREC 2006, Genoa, Italy, pp. 13–23 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paramita, M.L., Tang, J., Sanderson, M.: Generic and spatial approaches to image search results diversification. In: 31st European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR), pp. 603–610 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robertson, S.: On gmap: and other transformations. In: Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Virginia, USA, pp. 78–83 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sorokin, A., Forsyth, D.: Utility data annotation with amazon mechanical turk. In: Proceedings of the First IEEE Workshop on Internet Vision at CVPR 2008, pp. 1–8 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tang, J., Sanderson, M.: The tripod project technical report - modeling diversity in spatial information retrieval using spatial coverage. Technical report, University of Sheffield (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. van Kreveld, M., Reinbacher, I., Arampatzis, A., van Zwol, R.: Distributed ranking methods for geographic information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 20th European Workshop on Computational Geometry, pp. 231–243 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhai, C.X., Cohen, W.W., Lafferty, J.: Beyond independent relevance: Methods and evaluation metrics for subtopic retrieval. In: SIGIR 2006, Toronto, Canada, pp. 10–17 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, B., Li, H., Liu, Y., Ji, L., Xi, W., Fan, W., Chen, Z., Ma, W.-Y.: Improving web search results using affinity graph. In: SIGIR 2005, pp. 504–511. ACM, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tang, J., Sanderson, M. (2010). Evaluation and User Preference Study on Spatial Diversity. In: Gurrin, C., et al. Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5993. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12275-0_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12275-0_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12274-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12275-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics