Skip to main content

The Coming “République des Lettres”

The Academic World and the Web 2.0 Risks and Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
e-Research Collaboration
  • 808 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter analyzes the ways in which the development of various social networking tools is influencing the academic world. There are threats and opportunities. The academics could benefit from the significant opportunities created by changing ideas. Working on a collaborative, real time on-line basis, increases the possibilities of exchanging ideas. However, the vast amount of literature available on the Internet is co-authored by non academics and is not “vetted” or subject to peer review. How valid are the theories and findings of such papers? This is a serious matter of concern. The future (for example, MyNetResearch) belongs to tools that facilitate dedicated research exploiting current social networking opportunities. The focus of this chapter is to discuss pertinent social networking tools and how they can be used at their best to stimulate collaborative research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We made the following experiment. We looked through the Google search engine after the following fragment of sentence: “influence of the internet on the academic habits“. We obtained 1,140,000 results. Among them, the ready-made wiki.answers (wiki.answers is defined as: “Website that facilitates the answering of questions as well as allowing anyone to sign up and answer the questions of others. If you show exceptional skill, you might be recommended to be a supervisor, which allows to you to have the same power as a webmaster“, see: http://www.wiki.answers.com, cited 18 March, 2009) Q.: What are the factors that influence study habits among high school student? A.: Factors influencing study habits among high school student are: socio economic, concentration, remembering, organising time, listening and taking notes, taking tests, motivation”. It is an answer gave without further references and citations, attributed to a nickname. Could be took into consideration for an academic research? Or it is rather an argument for relying first on the academic standards already in use for writing a scientific article?.

  2. 2.

    http://dictionary.cambridge.org, cited 17 March, 2009.

  3. 3.

    http://www.catalhoyuk.com/, cited 17 March, 2009.

References

  • Bélanger, M. (2008). Online collaborative learning for labor education. Labor Studies Journal, 33, 412–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, K. M. (2001). Deep paper: The deep Web. Surfacing hidden value (Vol. 7). Ann Arbor, MI: Scholarly Publishing Office, University of Michigan, University Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges, J. L. (2000). The totallibrary: Non-fiction 1922S:LQß6. Allen Lane, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgman, C. L. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age. Information, Infrastructure and the Internet. Cambridge, USA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, L. (2007). The affordance of blogging: A case study in culture and technological effects. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 31, 331–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurak, L. J., & Antonijevic, S. (2008). The psychology of blogging. You, me and everyone in between. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 60–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. (2008). Patterns of revision in online writing: A study of Wikipedia’s featured articles. Written Communication, 25, 262–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murthy, D. (2008). Digital etnography: An examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology, 42, 837–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samida, S. (2006). Wissenschaftkommunication im internet. Neue Medien in der Archaeologie, Munich: Verlag Reinhard Fischer, Internet Research Band, 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, M., Truyen, F., & Coppens, H. (2007). Cutting the trees of knowledge: Social software, information architecture and their epistemic consequences. Thesis Eleven, 89, 94–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufekci, Z. (2008). Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 28, 20–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Dinescu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dinescu, A. (2010). The Coming “République des Lettres”. In: Anandarajan, M., Anandarajan, M. (eds) e-Research Collaboration. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12257-6_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics