Skip to main content

CISN ShakeAlert: An Earthquake Early Warning Demonstration System for California

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Early Warning for Geological Disasters

Abstract

To demonstrate the feasibility of earthquake early warning (EEW) in California, we have developed and implemented the CISN ShakeAlert demonstration system. A Decision Module combines estimates and uncertainties determined by three algorithms implemented in parallel, \(\tau _\mathrm{{c}}-\mathrm{{P}}_\mathrm{{d}}\) Onsite, Virtual Seismologist, and ElarmS, to calculate and report at a given time the most probable earthquake magnitude and location, as well as the likelihood of correct alarm. A User Display receives the alert messages in real-time, calculates the expected local shaking intensity, and displays the information on a map. Currently, CISN ShakeAlert is being tested by \(\sim \)70 individuals and test users from industries and emergency response organizations in California. During the next 3 years we plan to expand this demonstration warning system to the entire US West Coast.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen RV (1978) Automatic earthquake recognition and timing from single traces. Bull Seismol Soc Am 68(5):1521–1532

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen RM (2007) The ElarmS earthquake warning methodology and application across California. In: Gasparini P, Zschau J (eds) Seismic early warning. Springer, New York, pp 21–44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RM, Brown H, Hellweg M, Khainovski O, Lombard P, Neuhauser D (2009) Real-time earthquake detection and hazard assessment by ElarmS across California. Geophys Res Lett 36 L00B08. doi:10.1029/2008GL036766

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen RM, Kanamori H (2003) The potential for earthquake early warning in southern California. Science 300:786–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RM, Ziv A (2011) Application of real-time GPS to earthquake early warning. Geophys Res Lett 38 L16310. doi:10.1029/2011GL047947

  • Barba M, Böse M, Hauksson E (2010) In: The earthquake early warning demonstration tool (EEWDT) Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) Meeting, Palm Springs, California, 11–15 Sept 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Böse M, Heaton TH (2010) Probabilistic prediction of rupture length, slip and seismic ground motions for an ongoing rupture: implications for early warning for large earthquakes. Geophys J Int 183(2):1014–1030. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04774.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böse M, Heaton TH, Hauksson E (2012a) Rapid estimation of earthquake source and ground-motion parameters for earthquake early warning using data from single three-component broadband or strong-motion sensor. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102(2). doi: 10.1785/0120110152

  • Böse M, Heaton TH, Hauksson E (2012b) Real-time finite fault rupture detector (FinDer) for large earthquakes. Geophys J Int 191:803–812

    Google Scholar 

  • Böse M, Hauksson E, Solanki K, Kanamori H, Wu Y-M, Heaton T H (2009a) A new trigger criterion for improved real-time performance of on-site earthquake early warning in southern California, Bull Seism Soc Am 99(2-A): 897–905. doi: 10.1785/0120080034

  • Böse M, Hauksson E, Solanki K, Kanamori H, Heaton TH (2009b) Real-time testing of the on-site warning algorithm in southern California and its performance during the July 29 2008 Mw5.4 Chino Hills earthquake. Geophys Res Lett 36, L00B03. doi:10.1029/2008GL036366

  • Böse M, Solanki K, Allen RM, Brown H, Cua GB, Given D, Hauksson E, Heaton TH, CISN Earthquake Early Warning Project Team (2010) CISN ShakeAlert: development of a prototype user display for providing earthquake alerts to end users, American Geophysical Union, Fall meeting 2010, abstract #NH33A-1369

    Google Scholar 

  • Borcherdt RD (1994) Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design (methodology and justification). Earthq Spectr 10:617–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown HM, Allen RM, Hellweg M, Khainovski O, Neuhauser D, Souf A (2010) Development of the ElarmS methodology for earthquake early warning: realtime application in California and offline testing in Japan. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31:188–200. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown HM, Lim I, Allen RM, Neuhauser D, Khainovski O, Hellweg M (2010b) CISN earthquake early warning: ElarmS, NH33A-1372, 2010 fall meeting AGU. San Francisco, Dec 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprio M, Cua GB, Fischer M, Wiemer S, Heaton TH (2011) CISN ShakeAlert: accounting for site amplification and quantifying time and spatial dependence of uncertainty estimates in the virtual seismologist earthquake early warning algorithm. American Geophysical Union Fall meeting, San Francisco, pp S53A–2251

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper M (1868) Editorial in: San Francisco Daily Evening. Bulletin, 3 Nov 1868

    Google Scholar 

  • CSEP (2012) CSEP Testing Center Software and documentation. http://www.cseptesting.org

  • Cua GB (2005) Creating the virtual seismologist: developments in ground motion characterization and seismic early warning. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Cua G, Fischer M, Heaton T, Wiemer S, Giardini D (2009) Real-time performance of the virtual seismologist method in southern California. Seismol Res Lett 80:740–748. doi:710.1785/gssrl.1780.1785.1740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cua G, Heaton T (2007) The virtual seismologist (VS) method: a bayesian approach to earthquake early warning. In: Gasparini P, Manfredi G, Zschau J (eds) Earthquake early warning systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 97–132

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz L (2002) Notes on configuring \(\text{ BINDER }\_{\text{ EW }}\): earthworm’s phase associator. From http://www.isti2.com/ew/ovr/binder_setup.html

  • Faulkner M, Olson M, Chandy R, Krause J, Chandy KM, Krause A (2011) The next big one: detecting earthquakes and other rare events from community-based sensors. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE international conference on information processing in sensor networks, ACM

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer M, Caprio M, Cua GB, Heaton TH, Clinton JF, Wiemer S (2009) Multiple-threshold event detection and other enhancements to the virtual seismologist earthquake early warning algorithm. Amercian Geophysical Union Fall meeting, San Francisco, pp S22A–02

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstenberger MC, Rhoades DA (2010) New Zealand earthquake forecast testing centre. Pure Appl Geophys 167:877–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaton T (1985) A model for a seismic computerized alert network. Science 228(4702):987–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellweg, M, Allen RM, Brown H, Neuhauser DS, Khainovsky O (2010) CISN ShakeAlert: progress toward using early warnings for earthquakes in California, Abstract NH33A-1368 presented at 2010 fall meeting, AGU, San Francisco, California, 13–17 Dec 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellweg M, Vinci M (2011) CISN shakealert: using early warnings for earthquakes in California, Abstract S53A–2254 presented at 2011 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, California, 5–9 Dec 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Horiuchi S, Negishi H, Abe K, Kamimura A, Fujinawa Y (2005) An automatic processing system for broadcasting earthquake alarms. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(2):708–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan TH (2006) Earthquake predictability, brick by brick. Seismol Res Lett 77:3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori H (2005) Real-time seismology and earthquake damage mitigation. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 33:195–214. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karakus G, Heaton T (2011) Methodologies to automatically recognize foreshock/mainshock pairs. S53A–2268, AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, Dec 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Maechling PJ, Jordan TH, Liukis M, Callaghan S (2009) Developing performance measures for the CISN earthquake early warning testing center. Eos Trans AGU, 90(52), Fall Meeting Supplement, Abstract S13A–1717

    Google Scholar 

  • Maechling PJ, Liukis M, Jordan TH, CISN EEW Team (2011) Development of ShakeAlert performance evaluation software. Abstract S53A–2255 presented at 2011 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, California, 5–9 Dec 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzocchi W, Schorlemmer D, Wiemer S (eds) (2010) An earthquake forecast experiment in Italy. Special volume, Ann Geofisica 53(3):163

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier M-A, Cua GB, Fischer M, Wiemer S (2011) CISN ShakeAlert: improving the virtual seismologist earthquake early warning framework to provide faster, more robust warning information. S53A–2252, AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, Dec 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y (1988) On the urgent earthquake detection and alarm system (UrEDAS). In: Proceedings of the 9th world conference on earthquake engineering. Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanjo KZ, Tsuruoka H, Hirata N, Jordan TH (2011) Overview of the first earthquake forecast testing experiment in Japan. Earth Planets Space 63:159–169. doi:10.5047/eps.2010.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhauser DS, Khainovsky O, Böse M, Solanki K, Cua G, Heaton TH, Allen R (2010) CISN ShakeAlert: the decision module for earthquake alerts. AGU Fall Meeting, NH33A-1370. San Francisco, Dec 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanowicz B, Dreger D, Hellweg M (2011) Upgrading the broadband and borehole seismic networks operated by the Berkeley seismological laboratory at the university of California, Berkeley, USGS Award Number G09AC00487, Final technical report

    Google Scholar 

  • Satriano C, Lomax A, and Zollo A (2007) Optimal, real-time earthquake location for early warning. In: Gasparini P, Manfredi G, Zschau J (eds) Earthquake early warning systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Solanki K, Böse M, Hauksson E, Heaton TH, CISN EEW Group (2011) CISN ShakeAlert: protoype user display for providing earthquake early warnings to test users. AGU Fall Meeting, S53A–2250, San Francisco, Dec 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas V, Bhadha R, Crummey J, Curtis W, Devora A, Flores I, Given D, Hauksson E, Johnson D, Koesterer C, Lydeen S, Sutton D, Watkins M, Yu E (2011) Modernization of the caltech/USGS southern California seismic network—ARRA and beyond. AGU Fall Meeting, S51A–2194, San Francisco, Dec 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinci M, Hellweg M, Jones LM, Khainovski O, Schwartz K, Lehrer D, Allen RM, Neuhauser DS (2009) CISN ShakeAlert: using early warnings for earthquakes in California. Eos, 90(52), Fall Meeting Supplement, S13A–1720

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald DJ, Quitoriano V, Heaton T, Kanamori H, Scrivner CW, Worden BC (1999) TriNet “ShakeMaps”: rapid generation of peak ground motion and intensity maps for earthquakes in southern California. Earthquake Spectra 15(3):537–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Beck JL (2011) An automated decision-making system framework for earthquake early warning system applications. In: Conference proceedings of the 8th international conference on urban earthquake engineering (CUEE): 1737–1740, Tokyo, Japan, Mar 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y-M, Kanamori H, Allen RM, Hauksson E (2007) Determination of earthquake early warning parameters, \(\tau \)c and Pd, for southern California. Geophys J Int 170:711–717. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.3732007.03430.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurman G, Allen RM, Lombard P (2007) Toward earthquake early warning in northern California. J Geophys Res 112 B08311

    Google Scholar 

  • Zechar JD, Schorlemmer D, Liukis M, Yu J, Euchner F, Maechling PJ, Jordan TH (2010) The collaboratory for the study of earthquake predictability perspective on computational earthquake science. Concurr Comput-Pract Exp 22:1836–1847. doi:10.1002/cpe.1519

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is funded through contracts G09AC00258, G09AC00259, G09AC00255, and G09AC00256 from USGS/ANSS to the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), UC Berkeley, USC/SCEC, and ETH. It is also funded by grants from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation to Caltech and UC Berkeley. USC/SCEC received additional funding through SCEC3 (NSF Cooperative Agreement EAR-0529922 and USGS Cooperative Agreement 07HQAG0008). This is SCEC contribution #1641 and contribution #10072 of the Seismological Laboratory, Geological and Planetary Sciences at Caltech.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Böse .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Böse, M. et al. (2014). CISN ShakeAlert: An Earthquake Early Warning Demonstration System for California. In: Wenzel, F., Zschau, J. (eds) Early Warning for Geological Disasters. Advanced Technologies in Earth Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12233-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics