Abstract
The set of efficient policies could be too large to serve as a useful guide for real action. In this chapter we use compromise programming (CP) to reduce the number of eligible policies and get more precise policy recommendations than those derived from the efficient set itself. Apart from being efficient, so-called compromise policies have the property of minimizing the distance to the ideal point. We first perform a CP exercise which is a natural continuation of Chap. 6. We seek to offer policy recommendations that are as close as possible to the maximum growth rate and the minimum level of CO2 emissions. We conclude that the compromise set basically consists of a single point, which turns out to be a very handy property for policy making in practice. We also present a review of some general interesting properties of the compromise set and interpret its usefulness for our case. Finally, we broaden the scope of our exercise by solving a policy-making problem with four (rather than two) criteria. We discuss that, although not all the interesting properties of the compromise set can be guaranteed, it is still a useful device for real policy making.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
André FJ, Romero C (2008) Computing compromise solutions: on the connections between compromise programming and composite programming. Appl Math Comput 195:1–10
André FJ, Cardenete MA, Romero C (2008) Using compromise programming for macroeconomic policy making in a general equilibrium framework: theory and application to the Spanish economy. J Oper Res Soc 59:875–883
Ballestero E, Romero C (1991) A theorem connecting utility function optimization and compromise programming. Oper Res Lett 10:421–427
Ballestero E, Romero C (1994) Utility optimization when the utility function is virtually unknown. Theory Decision 37:233–243
Ballestero E, Romero C (1998) Multiple criteria decision making and its applications to economic problems. Kluwer Academic, Boston
Blasco F, Cuchillo-IbĂ¡Ă±ez E, MorĂ³n MA, Romero C (1999) On the monotonicity of the compromise set in multicriteria problems. J Optim Theory Appl 102:69–82
Freimer M, Yu PL (1976) Some new results on compromise solutions for group decision making. Manage Sci 22:688–693
MorĂ³n MA, Romero C, Ruiz-del-Portal FR (1996) Generating well-behaved utility functions for compromise programming. J Optim Theory Appl 91:643–649
Romero C (2001) Extended lexicographic goal programming: a unifying approach. Omega Int J Manage Sci 29:63–71
Zeleny M (1973) Compromise programming. In: Cochrane JL, Zeleny M (eds) Multiple criteria decision making. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia
Zeleny M (1974) A concept of compromise solutions and the method of the displaced ideal. Comput Oper Res 1:479–496
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
André, F.J., Cardenete, M.A., Romero, C. (2010). Compromise Policies: An Integration of Economic and Environmental Criteria. In: Designing Public Policies. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 642. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12183-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12183-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12182-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12183-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)