Skip to main content

Software Reliability Assessment Based on the Evaluation of Operational Experience

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5987))

Abstract

This paper illustrates a practicable approach to reliability evaluation for highly reliable software systems based on the analysis of their operational experience and demonstrates its applicability to the control software of a gearbox system. The investigations were carried out within a cooperation of academia and automotive industry. The article also elaborates on the possibility of assessing software reliability at system level by combination of component-specific software reliability estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amari, S., Misra, R.: Closed-form Expressions for Distribution of Sum of Exponential Random Variables. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 46(4) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhargava, R.P., Khatri, C.G.: The Distribution of Product of Independent Beta Random Variables with Application to Multivariate Analysis. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 33, 287–296 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Butler, R., Finelli, G.: The Infeasibility of Quantifying the Reliability of Life-critical Real-time Software. Software Engineering 19(1) (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cox, D.: Renewal Theory. Methuen & Co. (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ehrenberger, W.: Software-Verifikation. Hanser (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heinhold, J., Gaede, K.: Ingenieur-Statistik. Oldenbourg (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Law, A.M., Kelton, W.D.: Simulation, Modeling and Analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Limbourg, P., Savic, R., Petersen, J., Kochs, H.D.: Modelling Uncertainty in Fault Tree Analyses Using Evidence Theory. Journal of Risk and Reliability 222, 291–302 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Littlewood, B., Strigini, L.: Validation of Ultra-high Dependability for Software-based Systems. Communications of the ACM 36(11) (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Littlewood, B., Wright, D.: Stopping Rules for Operational Testing of Safety Critical Software. In: Proc. 25th International Symposium Fault Tolerant Computing (FTCS 25). IEEE, Los Alamitos (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Littlewood, B., Strigini, L.: Software Reliability and Dependability: A Roadmap. In: The Future of Software Engineering. ACM, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miller, K.W., Morell, L.J., Noonan, R.E., Park, S.K., Nicol, D.M., Murrill, B.W., Voas, J.F.: Estimating the Probability of Failure When Testing Reveals No Failures. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 18(1) (January 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parnas, D., van Schouwen, J., Kwan, S.: Evaluation of Safety-critical Software. Communications of the ACM 33(6) (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Quirk, W.J. (ed.): Verification and Validation of Real-time Software. Springer, Heidelberg (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Saglietti, F.: Evaluation of Pre-developed Software for Usage in Safety Critical Systems. In: Proc. 26th EUROMICRO Conference (EUROMICRO 2000). IEEE, Los Alamitos (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Saglietti, F., Pinte, F., Söhnlein, S.: Integration and Reliability Testing for Component-based Software Systems. In: Proc. 35th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA 2009). IEEE, Los Alamitos (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Söhnlein, S., Saglietti, F.: Auswertung der Betriebserfahrung zum Zuverlässigkeits-nachweis sicherheitskritischer Softwaresysteme. In: Proc. Automotive 2008 - Safety & Security, Sicherheit und Zuverlässigkeit für automobile Informationstechnik, Stuttgart (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Söhnlein, S., Saglietti, F., Bitzer, F., Baryschew, S.: Zuverlässigkeitsbewertung einer Getriebesteuerungs-Software durch Auswertung der Betriebserfahrung. Softwaretechnik-Trends, GI 29(3) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Störmer, H.: Mathematische Theorie der Zuverlässigkeit. Oldenbourg (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Trivedi, K.: Probability & Statistics with Reliability, Queuing, and Computer Science Applications. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wilks, S.: Determination of Sample Sizes for Setting Tolerance Limits. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 12, 91–96 (1941)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Söhnlein, S., Saglietti, F., Bitzer, F., Meitner, M., Baryschew, S. (2010). Software Reliability Assessment Based on the Evaluation of Operational Experience . In: Müller-Clostermann, B., Echtle, K., Rathgeb, E.P. (eds) Measurement, Modelling, and Evaluation of Computing Systems and Dependability and Fault Tolerance. MMB&DFT 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5987. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12104-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12104-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12103-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12104-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics