Skip to main content

Capacity Charges: A Price Adjustment Process for Managing Congestion in Electricity Transmission Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy, Natural Resources and Environmental Economics

Part of the book series: Energy Systems ((ENERGY))

  • 2194 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we suggest a procedure based on capacity charges for managing transmission constraints in electricity networks. The system operator states nodal capacity charges for transmission prior to market clearing. Market clearing brings forth a single market price for electricity. For optimal capacity charges the market equilibrium coincides with that of optimal nodal pricing. Capacity charges are based on technical distribution factors and estimates of the shadow prices of network constraints. Estimates can be based on market information from similar congestion situations, and then capacity charges can be brought near the optimal values through an iterative process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The “DC” approximation is the customary approximation used in the literature when dealing with the management of transmission constraints. Under these assumptions, and with well-behaved cost and benefit functions, the optimal dispatch problem is convex. For the specifics of the “DC” approximation, see for instance Wu and Varaiya (1995), Chao and Peck (1996), or Wu et al. (1996). In the “DC” approximation both losses and reactive power are left out.

  2. 2.

    See Dolan and Aldous (1993).

  3. 3.

    In general AC systems the load factors depend on the distribution of loads over the network. Our method applies also for general AC systems, however, requiring recalculations of the load factors according to the load.

  4. 4.

    Refer to Wu et al. (1996) for the characteristics of optimal nodal prices.

  5. 5.

    The number of independent loops are \(m - n + 1 = 8\,\mbox{ \textendash }\,6 + 1 = 3\).

  6. 6.

    In reality, this may not be so, as the grid lines may be operated with different capacities depending on the direction of the flow over the interconnection. This is especially so if links are aggregated individual lines.

References

  • Bjørndal, M., & Jörnsten, K. (2001). Zonal pricing in a deregulated electricity market. The Energy Journal, 22, 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørndal, M., Jörnsten, K., & Rud, L. (2000). A price adjustment process for managing congestion in the Norwegian scheduled power market. Conference Proceedings, IAEE Norge Conference, August 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, H. -P., & Peck, S. (1996). A market mechanism for electric power transmission. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 10, 25–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, A., & Aldous, J. (1993). Networks and algorithms: an introductory approach. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett, H., III (1963). Generalized lagrange multiplier method for solving problems of optimum allocation of resources. Operations Research, 11, 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glavitch, H., & Alvarado, F. (1997). Management of multiple congested conditions in unbundled operation of a power system. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 13, 374–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, W. W. (1992). Contract networks for electric power transmission. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 4, 211–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minoux, M. (1986). Mathematical programming. theory and algorithms. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweppe, F. C., Caramanis, M. C., Tabors, R. D., & Bohn, R. E. (1988). Spot pricing of electricity. Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoft, S. (1998). Congestion pricing with fewer prices than zones. The Electricity Journal, (May), 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F., & Varaiya, P. (1995). Coordinated multilateral trades for electric power networks: theory and implementation. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F., Varaiya, P., Spiller, P., & Oren, S. (1996). Folk theorems on transmission access: proofs and counterexamples. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 10, 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Rud .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bjørndal, M., Jörnsten, K., Rud, L. (2010). Capacity Charges: A Price Adjustment Process for Managing Congestion in Electricity Transmission Networks. In: Bjørndal, E., Bjørndal, M., Pardalos, P., Rönnqvist, M. (eds) Energy, Natural Resources and Environmental Economics. Energy Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12067-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12067-1_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12066-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12067-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics