Advertisement

A Hybrid Methodology for Consumer-Oriented Healthcare Knowledge Acquisition

  • Elena Cardillo
  • Luciano Serafini
  • Andrei Tamilin
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5943)

Abstract

In Consumer Healthcare Informatics it is still difficult for laypersons to find, understand and act on health information, due to the persistent communication gap between specialized medical terminology and “lay” medical terminology used by healthcare consumers. Furthermore, existing clinically-oriented terminologies cannot provide sufficient support when integrated into consumer-oriented applications, so there is a need to create consumer-friendly terminologies reflecting the different ways healthcare consumers express and think about health topics. This work suggests a methodology to acquire consumer health terminology for creating a Consumer-oriented Medical Vocabulary for Italian that mitigates this gap. This resource, aligned to a standard medical terminology, could be useful in Personal Health Records to improve users’ accessibility to their healthcare data. We performed evaluation mapping on acquired data to the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC-2) to find overlaps and the candidate “lay” terms that can be considered good synonyms for the medical ones.

Keywords

Medical Classification Systems Knowledge Acquisition Consumer Healthcare Terminology ICPC2 Mapping 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bartolini, R., Lenci, A., Marchi, S., Montemagni, S., Pirrelli, V.: Text-2-knowledge: Acquisizione semi-automatica di ontologie per l’indicizzazione semantica di documenti. Technical Report for the PEKITA Project, ILC, Pisa, p. 23 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bechhofer, S., Van Harmelen, F., Hendler, J., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Stein, A.L.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference, W3C Recommendation (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284(5), 34–43 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cardillo, E., Eccher, C., Tamilin, A., Serafini, L.: Logical Analysis of Mappings between Medical Classification Systems. In: Dochev, D., Pistore, M., Traverso, P. (eds.) AIMSA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5253, pp. 311–321. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grabenweger, J., Duftschmid, G.: Ontologies and their Application in Electronic Health Records. In: eHealth2008 Medical Informatics meets eHealth, Wien, May 29-30 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keselman, A., Logan, R., Smith, C.A., Leroy, G., Zeng, Q.: Developing Informatics Tools and Strategies for Consumer-centered Health Communication. Journal of Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 14(4), 473–483 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim, H., Zeng, Q., Goryachev, S., Keselman, A., Slaughter, L., Smith, C.A.: Text Characteristics of Clinical Reports and Their Implications for the Readability of Personal Health Records. In: 12th World Congress on Health (Medical) Informatics, MEDINFO 2007, pp. 1117–1121. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Milton, N.R.: Knowledge Acquisition in Practice: A Step-by-step Guide. Springer, Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nardon, F.B., Moura, L.A.: Knowledge Sharing and Information Integration in Healthcare using Ontologies and Deductive Databases. In: MEDINFO 2004, pp. 62–66. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Okkes, I.M., Jamoullea, M., Lamberts, H., Bentzen, N.: ICPC-2-E: the electronic version of ICPC-2. Differences from the printed version and the consequences. Family Practice 17, 101–107 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rector, A.: Clinical Terminology: Why is it so hard? Methods of Information in Medicine 38(4), 239–252 (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rosembloom, T.S., Miller, R.A., Johnson, K.B., Elkin, P.L., Brown, H.S.: Interface Terminologies: Facilitating Direct Entry of Clinical Data into Electronic Health Record Systems. Journal of Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 13(3), 277–287 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soergel, D., Tse, T., Slaughter, L.: Helping Healthcare Consumers Understand: An “Interpretative Layer” for Finding and Making Sense of Medical Information. In: International Medical Informatics Association’s Conference, IMIA 2004, pp. 931–935 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zeng, Q., Tse, T.: Exploring and Developing Consumer Health Vocabularies. J. of Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 13, 24–29 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zeng, Q., Goryachev, S., Keselman, A., Rosendale, D.: Making Text in Electronic Health Records Comprehensible to Consumers: A Prototype Translator. In: 31st American Medical Informatics Association’s Annual Symposium, AMIA 2007, pp. 846–850 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elena Cardillo
    • 1
  • Luciano Serafini
    • 1
  • Andrei Tamilin
    • 1
  1. 1.FBK-IRSTPovoItaly

Personalised recommendations