Abstract
In our understanding it is clear that the current practice of the Commission’s impact assessment goes far beyond the practice in most Member States. Also, the Commission’s policy to introduce a “culture of analysis” appears sensible as it addresses the differing educational backgrounds within the staff and attempts to gently move desk officers to increase the potential benefits of a systematic assessment of impacts in a written way. Overall, we value these developments and believe that the Commission’s position on impact assessment should be considered when designing an effective impact assessment system in Germany. However, in our opinion there is still considerable potential for improvement of the Commission’s practice especially concerning impacts on the environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Cf. Chap. 1, section “Concentrating on One Comparative Method”
- 2.
An alternative would be: A positive IAB statement is a precondition for the initiation of the next stage in the legislative process.
References
Bizer, K. (1999). Die Ö konomik der Verhältnismäßigkeit. Darmstadt: Sonderforschungsgruppe Institutionenanalyse.
Commission of the European Communities (2009). Impact assessment guidelines. Commission of the European Communities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bizer, K., Lechner, S., Führ, M. (2010). Conclusions. In: Bizer, K., Lechner, S., Führ, M. (eds) The European Impact Assessment and the Environment. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11670-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11670-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11669-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11670-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)