Skip to main content

Using Structured e-Forum to Support the Legislation Formation Process

  • Conference paper
Next Generation Society. Technological and Legal Issues (e-Democracy 2009)

Abstract

Many public policy problems are ‘wicked’, being characterised by high complexity, many heterogeneous views and conflicts among various stakeholders, and also lack of mathematically ‘optimal’ solutions and predefined algorithms for calculating them. The best approach for addressing such problems is through consultation and argumentation among stakeholders. The e-participation research has investigated and suggested several ICT tools for this purpose, such as e-forum, e-petition and e-community tools. This paper investigates the use of an advanced ICT tool, the structured e-forum, for addressing such wicked problems associated with the legislation formation. For this purpose we designed, implemented and evaluated two pilot e-consultations on legislation under formation in the Parliaments of Austria and Greece using a structured e-forum tool based on the Issue Based Information Systems (IBIS) framework. The conclusions drawn reveal the advantages offered by the structured e-forum, but also its difficulties as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Coleman, S., Gotze, J.: Bowling together: Online public engagement in policy delibaration (2002), http://bowlingtogether.net

  2. Saebo, O., Rose, J., Flak, L.S.: The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly 25, 400–428 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Organization for Economic Co-operation & Development – OECD, Engaging Citizens Online for Better Policy-making, Policy Brief. OECD, Paris (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Organization for Economic Co-operation & Development – OECD, Promise and Problems of e-Democracy: Challenges of Online Citizen Engagement. OECD, Paris (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Whyte, A., Macintosh, A.: Analysis and Evaluation of E-Consultations. e-Service Journal 2(1), 9–34 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Macintosh, A., Malina, A., Whyte, A.: Designing E-Participation in Scotland. Communications 27, 261–278 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Macintosh, A.: Characterizing E-Participation in Policy Making. In: Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karacapilidis, N., Papadias, D.: Computer Supported Argumentation and Collaborative Decision Making: The HERMES system. Information Systems 26(4), 259–277 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Karacapilidis, N., Loukis, E., Dimopoulos, S.: Computer-supported G2G collaboration for public policy and decision making. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 18(5), 602–624 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kunz, W., Rittel, H.: Issues as Elements of Information Systems, Working Paper No. 131, California, Berkley (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Conklin, J., Begeman, M.: gIBIS: A tool for all reasons. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 40(3), 200–213 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Conklin, J.: Dialog Mapping: Reflections on an Industrial Strength Case Study. In: Kirschner, P., Buckingham Shum, S., Carr, C. (eds.) Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making. Springer, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Loukis, E., Wimmer, M., Triantafillou, A., Gatautis, R., Charalabidis, Y.: Electronic support of participation in the development of legislation: the LEX-IS project. In: 5th Eastern European eGov Days 2007, Prague, Czech Republic, April 11-13 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rittel, H.W.J., Weber, M.M.: Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4, 155–169 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Davis, F.D.: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319–340 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Xenakis, A., Loukis, E. (2010). Using Structured e-Forum to Support the Legislation Formation Process. In: Sideridis, A.B., Patrikakis, C.Z. (eds) Next Generation Society. Technological and Legal Issues. e-Democracy 2009. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 26. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11631-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11631-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11629-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11631-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics