Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Quality Engineering pp 153–165Cite as

Qualität multimodaler Systeme

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 3492 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel sollen nun Systeme behandelt werden, welche neben gesprochener Sprache weitere Modalitäten zum Informationsaustausch mit dem Nutzer verwenden. Die multimodale Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion hat in den vergangenen Jahren zunehmend wissenschaftliches Interesse wie auch wirtschaftliche Bedeutung erlangt. Gründe hierfür sind zum einen die prinzipiellen Vorteile von multimodalen gegenüber unimodalen (bspw. rein sprachbasierten) Systemen. Durch die Kombination unterschiedlicher Modalitäten können Nachteile einzelner Modalitäten ausgeglichen und somit der Kommunikationsprozess insgesamt optimiert werden. Zum anderen ist eine multimodale Interaktion für spezielle Benutzergruppen sinnvoll, bei denen bestimmte Sinne nur eingeschränkt einsetzbar sind, bspw. behinderte oder ältere Benutzer, vgl. Fellbaum und Hampicke (2006).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • André E, Dybkjær L, MinkerW, Heisterkamp P (Hrsg) (2004) Affective Dialogue Systems, Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker T, Gerstenberger C, Kruijff-Korbayova I, Korthauer A, Pinkal M, Pitz M, Poller P, Schehl J (2006) Natural and intuitive multimodal dialogue for in-car applications: The SAMMIE system. In: Proc. 4th Prestigious Applications of Intelligent Systems (PAIS-2006), Riva del Garda

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoît C, Martin JC, Pelachaud C, Schomaker L, Suhm B (2000) Handbook of Multimodal and Spoken Dialogue Systems, Kluwer Academic Publ., Boston MA, Kapitel Audio-Visual and Multimodal Speech-Based Systems, S 102–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernsen NO (2002) Multimodality in Language and Speech Systems, Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, Kapitel Multimodality in Language and Speech Systems – From Theory to Design Support Tool, S 93–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernsen NO, Dybkjær L (1999) A theory of speech in multimodal systems. In: Dalsgaard P, Lee CH, Heisterkamp P, Cole R (Hrsg) Proc. ESCA Workshop on Interactive Dialogue in Multi-Modal Systems, Europ. Speech Comm. Assoc., Kloster Irsee, S 105–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernsen NO, Dybkjær L (2005a) Comparative user evaluation of conversational agent H. C. Andersen. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Speech and Computer (SPECOM 2005), Patras, S 211–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernsen NO, Dybkjær L (2005b) User evaluation of conversational agent H. C. Andersen. In: Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Spoken Language Processing (Interspeech 2005), Lisboa, S 2473–2476

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernsen NO, Dybkjær L, Kiilerich S (2004) Evaluating conversation with Hans Christian Andersen. In: Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2004), Lisbon, Vol 3, S 1011–1014

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke J (1996) Usability Evaluation in Industry, Taylor & Francis, London, Kapitel SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale, S 189–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Chateau N, Gros L, Durin V, Macé A (2006) Redrawing the link between customer satisfaction and speech quality. In: Möller S, Raake A, Jekosch U, Hanisch M (Hrsg) Proc. 2nd ISCA/DEGA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Perceptual Quality of Systems, Berlin, S 88–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Coutaz J, Nigay L, Salber D, Blandford AE, May J, Young RM (1995) Four easy pieces for assessing the usability of multimodal interaction: The CARE properties. In: Nordby K, Helmersen PH, Gilmore DJ, Arnesen SA (Hrsg) Human-Computer Interaction, Proc. Interact’95, Chapman & Hall, London, S 115–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalsgaard P, Lee CH, Heisterkamp P, Cole R (Hrsg) (1999) Proc. ESCA Workshop on Interactive Dialogue in Multi-Modal Systems, Europ. Speech Comm. Assoc. (ESCA), Kloster Irsee

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehn DM, van Mulken S (2000) The impact of animated interface agents: A review of empirical research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dybkjær L, André E, Minker W, Heisterkamp P (Hrsg) (2002) Proc. ISCA Tutorial and ResearchWorkshop on Multi-Modal Dialogue in Mobile Environments, Int. Speech Comm. Assoc., Kloster Irsee

    Google Scholar 

  • Dybkjær L, Bernsen NO, Minker W (2004) Evaluation and usability of multimodal spoken language dialogue systems. Speech Communication 43:33–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EURESCOM Project P.807 Deliverable 1 (1998) Jupiter II – Usability, Performability and Interoperability Trials in Europe. European Institute for Research and Strategic Studies in Telecommunications, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellbaum K, Hampicke M (2006) Sentha – Seniorengerechte Technik im häuslichen Alltag, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Kapitel Digitale Vernetzung – Smart-Home, S 93–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellbaum K, Ketzmerick B (2002) Über die Rolle der Audio-Komponente bei der Multimedia-Kommunikation. In: Hoffmann R (Hrsg) Elektronische Sprachsignalverarbeitung, Studientexte zur Sprachkommunikation 24, w.e.b. Universitätsverlag, Dresden, S 331–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster ME, White M (2005) Assessing the impact of adaptive generation in the COMIC multimodal dialogue system. In: Proc. 19th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2005), Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Green A, Hüttenrauch H, Topp EA, Eklundh KS (2006) Developing a contextualized multimodal corpus for human-robot interaction. In: Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006), Genoa, S 401–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson J, Lundeberg M, Liljencrants J (1999) Experiences from the development of August – a multi-modal spoken dialogue system. In: Dalsgaard P, Lee CH, Heisterkamp P, Cole R (Hrsg) Proc. ESCAWorkshop on Interactive Dialogue in Multi-Modal Systems, Europ. Speech Comm. Assoc., Kloster Irsee, S 61–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassenzahl M, Platz A, Burmester M, Lehner K (2000) Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software’s appeal. In: Proc. CHI 2000, Den Haag, S 201–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassenzahl M, Burmester M, Koller F (2003) Attrakdiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In: Ziegler J, Szwillus G (Hrsg) Mensch & Computer 2003, Teubner, Stuttgart, S 187–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Hone KS (2006) Empathic agents to reduce user frustration. The effects of varying agent characteristics. Interacting with Computers 18:227–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ITU-T Rec. P.851 (2003) Subjective Quality Evaluation of Telephone Services Based on Spoken Dialogue Systems. International Telecommunication Union, Genf

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokinen K, Hurtig T (2006) User expectations and real experience on a multimodal interactive system. In: Proc. 9th Int. Conf. on Spoken Language Processing (Interspeech 2006), Pittsburgh PA, S 1049–1052

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirakowski J, Corbett M (1993) SUMI: The software usability measurement inventory. British Journal of Educational Technology 24(3):210–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruijff-Korbayova I, Becker T, Blaylock N, Gerstenberger C, Kaisser M, Poller P, Rieser V, Schehl J (2006) The SAMMIE corpus of multimodal dialogues with an MP3 player. In: Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006), Genoa, S 2018–2023

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamel L, Bennacef S, Gauvain JL, Dartigues H, Temem JN (1998) User evaluation of the MASK kiosk. In: Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP’98), Sydney, Vol 7, S 2875–2878

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester JC, Stone BA, Converse SA, Kahler SE, Barlow ST (1997) Animated pedagogical agents and problem-solving effectiveness: A large-scale empirical evaluation. In: Proc. World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, S 23–30

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Cózar R, Callejas Z, Montoro R (2006) DS-UCAT: A new multimodal dialogue system for an academic application. In: Proc. Interspeech Satellite Workshop: Dialogue on Dialogues Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Advanced Speech-based Interactive Systems, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Cózar Delgardo R, Araki M (2005) Spoken, Multilingual and Multimodal Dialogue Systems: Development and Assessment. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandryk RL, Inkpen K, Calvert TW (2006) Using psycho-physiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technologies. Behaviour and Information Technology 25(2):141–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MinkerW, Bühler D, Dybkjær L (2004) Spoken Multimodal Human-Computer Dialogue in Mobile Environments. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller S, Krebber J, Raake A, Smeele P, Rajman M, Melichar M, Pallotta V, Tsakou G, Kladis B, Vovos A, Hoonhout J, Schuchardt D, Fakotakis N, Ganchev T, Potamitis I (2004) INSPIRE: Evaluation of a smart-home system for infotainment management and device control. In: Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2004), Lisboa, Vol 5, S 1603–1606

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller S (2006) Messung und Vorhersage der Effizienz bei der Interaktion mit Sprachdialogdiensten. In: Fortschritte der Akustik – DAGA 2006, Deutsche Gesellschaft f. Akustik, Braunschweig, S 463–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller S, Engelbrecht KP, Kühnel C, Wechsung I, Weiss B (2010) Human-Centric Interfaces for Ambient Intelligence, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Kapitel Evaluation of Multimodal Interfaces for Ambient Intelligence, S 347–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostefa D, Garcia MN, Hamon O, Choukri K (2006) CHIL: Evaluation of multimodal technology components. In: Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006), Genoa, S 915–918

    Google Scholar 

  • Naumann A, Hurtienne J, Israel JH, Mohs C, Kindsmüller MC, Meyer HA, Husslein S (2007) Intuitive use of user interfaces: Defining a vague concept. In: Harris D (Hrsg) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, Proc. HCII 2007, Springer, Heidelberg, LNAI 4562, Vol 13, S 128–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Naumann AB,Wechsung I,Möller S (2008) Perception in multimodal dialogue systems. In: André E, Dybkjær L, Minker W, Neumann H, Pieraccini R, Weber M (Hrsg) Factors Influencing Modality Choice in Multimodal Applications, Springer, Springer Lecture Series in Artificial Intelligence 5078, S 37–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu L, Benbasat I (2005) An investigation into the effects of text-to-speech voice and 3D avatars on the perception of presence and flow of live help in electronic commerce. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 12:329–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves LM, Lai J, Larson JA, Oviatt S, Balaji TS, Buisine S, Collings P, Cohen P, Kraal B, Martin J, McTear M, Raman T, Stanney KM, Su H, Wang QY (2004) Guidelines for multimodal user interface design. Comm ACM 47(1):57–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelmaszweska H, Fields B, Blandford A (2004) Conceptualising user hedonic experience. In: Reed DJ, Baxter G, Blythe M (Hrsg) Proc. ECCE-12, Living and Working with Technology, EACE, York, S 83–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturm J, Bakx I, Cranen B, Terken J, Wang F (2002) Usability evaluation of a Dutch multimodal system for train timetable information. In: Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2002), Las Palmas, Vol 1, S 255–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Turunen M, Hakulinen J, Melto A, Hella J, Rajaniemi JP, Mäkinen E, Rantala J, Heimonen T, Laivo T, Soronen H, Hansen M, Valkama P, Miettinen T, Raisamo R (2009) Speech-based and multimodal media center for different user groups. In: Proc. Interspeech 2009, Brighton, S 1439–1442

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlster W (2004) SmartWeb: Mobile applications of the semantic web. In: Dadam P, Reichert M (Hrsg) GI Jahrestagung 2004, Vol 1, S 26–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlster W (2006) SmartKom: Foundations of Multimodal Dialogue Systems. Cognitive Technologies, Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker M, Whittaker S, Stent A, Maloor P, Moore J, Johnston M, Vasireddy G (2004) Generation and evaluation of user tailored responses in multimodal dialogue. Cognitive Science 28:811–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsung I, Naumann A (2008) Evaluation methods for multimodal systems: A comparison of standardized usability questionnaires. In: Perception in Multimodal Dialogue Systems. 4th IEEE Tutorial and Research Workshop on Perception and Interactive Technologies for Speech-Based Systems (PIT 2008), Springer, S 276–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee N, Bailenson JN, Rickertsen K (2007) A meta-analysis of the impact of the inclusion and realism of human-like faces on user experiences in interfaces. In: Proc. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), S 1–10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Quality and Usability Lab Deutsche Telekom Laboratories, TU Berlin, Ernst-Reuter-Platz 7, 10587, Berlin, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr.-Ing. Sebastian Möller

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr.-Ing. Sebastian Möller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Möller .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Möller, S. (2010). Qualität multimodaler Systeme. In: Quality Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11548-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation