Skip to main content

Consequences of Social and Institutional Setups for Occurrence Reporting in Air Traffic Organizations

  • Conference paper
Book cover Autonomic Computing and Communications Systems (AUTONOMICS 2009)

Abstract

Deficient safety occurrence reporting by air traffic controllers is an important issue in many air traffic organizations. To understand the reasons for not reporting, practitioners formulated a number of hypotheses, which are difficult to verify manually. To perform automated, formally-based verification of the hypotheses an agent-based modeling and simulation approach is proposed in this paper. This approach allows modeling both institutional (prescriptive) aspects of the formal organization and social behavior of organizational actors. To our knowledge, agent-based organization modeling has not been attempted in air traffic previously. Using such an approach four hypotheses related to consequences of controller team composition in particular organizational contexts were examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ek, A., Akselsson, R., Arvidsson, M., Johansson, C.R.: Safety culture in Swedish air traffic control. Safety Science 45(7), 791–811 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eurocontrol: Air navigation system safety assessment methodology. SAF.ET1.ST03.1000-MAN-01, edition 2.0 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hersey, P., Blanchard, K.H., Johnson, D.E.: Management of Organizational Behavior: Leading Human Resources (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hofstede, G.: Cultures and Organizations. McGraw-Hill, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kleijnen, J.P.C.: Verification and validation of simulation models. European Journal of Operational Research 82(1), 145–162 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Patankar, M.S., Brown, J.P., Treadwell, M.D.: Safety ethics. Ashgate (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pinder, C.C.: Work motivation in organizational behavior. Prentice-Hall, NJ (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pritchett, A.R., Lee, S., Goldsman, D.: Hybrid-System Simulation for National Airspace System Safety Analysis. AIAA Journal of Aircraft 38(5), 835–840 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M., Tarantola, S.: Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharpanskykh, A.: On Computer-Aided Methods for Modeling and Analysis of Organizations. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sharpanskykh, A., Stroeve, S.H.: Safety modelling and analysis of organizational processes in air traffic – Deliverable D5: Validation plan. NLR, report NLR-CR-2008-653 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stroeve, S.H., Blom, H.A.P., Van der Park, M.N.J.: Multi-agent situation awareness error evolution in accident risk modelling. In: 5th ATM R & D Seminar (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tumer, K., Agogino, A.: Distributed agent-based air traffic flow management. In: AAMAS 2007, pp. 342–349. ACM Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Young, P.C.: Data-based mechanistic modelling, generalised sensitivity and dominant mode analysis. Comput. Phys. Commun. 117, 113–129 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Appendix, http://www.few.vu.nl/~sharp/app.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sharpanskykh, A. (2010). Consequences of Social and Institutional Setups for Occurrence Reporting in Air Traffic Organizations. In: Vasilakos, A.V., Beraldi, R., Friedman, R., Mamei, M. (eds) Autonomic Computing and Communications Systems. AUTONOMICS 2009. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 23. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11482-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11482-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11481-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11482-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics