Skip to main content

Measurement Errors and Uncertainty: A Statistical Perspective

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Perspectives in Statistical Modeling and Data Analysis

Abstract

Evaluation of measurement systems is necessary in many industrial contexts. The literature on this topic is mainly focused on how to measure uncertainties for systems that yield continuous output. Few references are available for categorical data and they are briefly recalled in this paper. Finally a new proposal to measure uncertainty when the output is bounded ordinal is introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Burdick, R. K., Borror, C. M., & Montgomery, D. C. (2003). A review of methods for measurement systems capability analysis. Technometrics, 43, 342–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1960). Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Màst, J., & Van Wieringen, W. N. (2004). Measurement system analysis for bounded ordinal data. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 20, 383–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Màst, J., & Van Wieringen, W. N. (2007). Measurement system analysis for categorical measurements: agreement and kappa-type indices. The Journal of Quality Technology, 39, 191–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deldossi, L., & Zappa, D. (2009). ISO 5725 and GUM: comparison and comments. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 3, 159–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Elia, A., & Piccolo, D. (2005). A mixture model for preference data analysis. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 49, 917–934.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Iannario, M., & Piccolo, D. (2009). A program in R for CUB models inference, Version 2.0. Available at http://www.dipstat.unina.it

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1994). ISO 5725. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1995). Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo, D. (2003). On the moments of a mixture of uniform and shifted binomial random variables. Quaderni di Statistica, 5, 85–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo, D. (2006). Observed information matrix for MUB models. Quaderni di Statistica, 8, 33–78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Deldossi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Deldossi, L., Zappa, D. (2011). Measurement Errors and Uncertainty: A Statistical Perspective. In: Ingrassia, S., Rocci, R., Vichi, M. (eds) New Perspectives in Statistical Modeling and Data Analysis. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11363-5_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics