Advertisement

Explaining and Predicting the Behavior of BDI-Based Agents in Role-Playing Games

  • Michal P. Sindlar
  • Mehdi M. Dastani
  • Frank Dignum
  • John-Jules Ch. Meyer
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5948)

Abstract

Virtual characters in games operate in a social context involving other characters and possibly human players as well. If such socially situated virtual characters are to be considered believable to players, they should appear to adjust their behavior based on their (presumed) beliefs about the mental states of other characters. Autonomous BDI-based agents are suitable for modeling characters that base their actions on mental states attributed to other agents. In this paper, it is illustrated how agent-based characters can infer the mental state of other virtual characters by observing others’ actions in the context of some scene in a role-playing game. Contextual information can be utilized in explanation and prediction of agents’ behavior, and as such can form the basis for developing characters that appear to be socially aware.

Keywords

Autonomous Agent Predictive Function Virtual Character Behavioral Rule Behavioral Description 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Loyall, A.B.: Believable Agents. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Laird, J.E.: It knows what you’re going to do: Adding anticipation to a Quakebot. In: AGENTS (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Afonso, N., Prada, R.: Agents that relate: Improving the social believability of non-player characters in role-playing games. In: Stevens, S.M., Saldamarco, S.J. (eds.) ICEC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5309, pp. 34–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Albrecht, D.W., Zukerman, I., Nicholson, A.E.: Bayesian models for keyhole plan recognition in an adventure game. User Modeling & User-Adapted Interaction 8(1-2), 5–47 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goultiaeva, A., Lespérance, Y.: Incremental plan recognition in an agent programming framework. In: Proceedings of PAIR (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sindlar, M.P., Dastani, M.M., Dignum, F., Meyer, J.-J.Ch.: Mental state abduction of BDI-based agents. In: Baldoni, M., Son, T.C., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Winikoff, M. (eds.) DALT 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5397, pp. 110–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scott, B.: Architecting a Game AI. In: AI Game Programming Wisdom, pp. 285–289. Charles River Media, Hingham (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dignum, V.: A Model for Organizational Interaction. PhD thesis, SIKS Dissertation Series (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coutinho, L.R., Sichman, J.S., Boissier, O.: Modeling organization in MAS. In: SEAS (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dastani, M.: 2APL: A practical agent programming language. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 16, 214–248 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bordini, R.H., Hübner, J.F., Wooldridge, M.: Programming Multi-Agent Systems in AgentSpeak using Jason. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken (2007)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Millington, I.: Artificial Intelligence for Games. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dastani, M., Dignum, V., Dignum, F.: Role-assignment in open agent societies. In: Proceedings of AAMAS (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dastani, M.M., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Hulstijn, J., Dignum, F.P.M., Meyer, J.-J.Ch.: Enacting and deacting roles in agent programming. In: Odell, J.J., Giorgini, P., Müller, J.P. (eds.) AOSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3382, pp. 189–204. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dignum, F.: Autonomous agents with norms. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7(1), 69–79 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Castelfranchi, C., Dignum, F., Jonker, C.M., Treur, J.: Deliberative normative agents: Principles and architecture. In: Jennings, N.R. (ed.) ATAL 1999. LNCS, vol. 1757, pp. 364–378. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bethesda Game Studios: The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michal P. Sindlar
    • 1
  • Mehdi M. Dastani
    • 1
  • Frank Dignum
    • 1
  • John-Jules Ch. Meyer
    • 1
  1. 1.University of UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations