Advertisement

Untraceable Tags Based on Mild Assumptions

  • Carlo Blundo
  • Angelo De Caro
  • Giuseppe Persiano
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5939)

Abstract

Radio frequency identification (RFID) chips have been widely deployed in large-scale systems such as inventory control and supply chain management. While RFID technology has much advantage, however it may create new problems to privacy. Tag untraceability is a significant concern that needs to be addressed in deploying RFID-based system.

In this paper we propose a new construction for untraceable tags. Our construction is the first construction in the symmetric bilinear setting based on a mild assumption. That is our assumption is tautological in the generic group model and is “efficiently falsifiable” in the sense that its problem instances are stated non-interactively and concisely (i.e., independently of the number of adversarial queries and other large quantities).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ateniese, G., Camenisch, J., de Medeiros, B.: Untraceable rfid tags via insubvertible encryption. In: Atluri, V., Meadows, C., Juels, A. (eds.) ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 92–101. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blundo, C., De Caro, A., Persiano, G.: Untraceable tags based on mild assumptions. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2009/380 (2009), http://eprint.iacr.org/
  3. 3.
    Boyen, X., Waters, B.: Anonymous Hierarchical Identity-Based Encryption (Without Random Oracles). In: Dwork, C. (ed.) CRYPTO 2006. LNCS, vol. 4117, pp. 290–307. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Garfinkel, S., Rosenberg, B.: RFID: Applications, Security, and Privacy. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Golle, P., Jakobsson, M., Juels, A., Syverson, P.F.: Universal re-encryption for mixnets. In: Okamoto, T. (ed.) CT-RSA 2004. LNCS, vol. 2964, pp. 163–178. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lysyanskaya, A., Rivest, R.L., Sahai, A., Wolf, S.: Pseudonym systems (Extended abstract). In: Heys, H.M., Adams, C.M. (eds.) SAC 1999. LNCS, vol. 1758, p. 184. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Naor, M.: On cryptographic assumptions and challenges (invited talk). In: Boneh, D. (ed.) CRYPTO 2003. LNCS, vol. 2729, pp. 96–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Near field communication forum, http://www.nfc-forum.org/
  11. 11.
    PBC: The Pairing-Based Cryptography Library. Ver. 0.4.18, http://crypto.stanford.edu/pbc/
  12. 12.
    Shoup, V.: Lower bounds for discrete logarithms and related problems. In: Fumy, W. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1233, pp. 256–266. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    TegoTag (2009), http://www.tegoinc.com/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlo Blundo
    • 1
  • Angelo De Caro
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Persiano
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Informatica ed ApplicazioniUniversità di SalernoItaly

Personalised recommendations