Advertisement

Towards Situation Awareness in Integrated Air Defence Using Clustering and Case Based Reasoning

  • Manish Gupta
  • Sumant Mukherjee
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5909)

Abstract

For integrated air defence in network centric environment, it is required to process information (collected from multiple sensors) for enhancing Situation Awareness (SA) at the command and control nodes. SA is the process of building comprehensive pictures of the battlespace to the decision maker who can further utilized it for threat evaluation. A novel approach for enhancing situation awareness in integrated air defence perspective via Clustering and Case Based Reasoning (CBR) has been proposed in this paper. Clustering is applied on track data generated from Level I of multi sensor data fusion to aggregate entities in the target area. CBR further provide information about air package type, size and purpose of the aggregated entities using cluster attribute records. The effectiveness of the proposed approach has been illustrated on simulation data generated to depict typical integrated defence scenario.

Keywords

Network Centric Warfare Integrated Air Defence Situation Awareness Clustering Case Based Reasoning 

References

  1. 1.
    Aamodt, A.: Explanation-driven case-based reasoning, Topics in Case-based reasoning, pp. 274–288. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahlberg, S., et al.: An information fusion demonstrator for tactical intelligence processing in network-based defense. Information Fusion 8, 84–107 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Endsley, M.R.: Toward a theory of situational awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37, 32–64 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feng, H., et al.: Modelling situation awareness for Context-aware Decision Support. Expert Systems with Applications 36, 455–463 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnson, S.C.: Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika 32(3), 241–254 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kolodner, J.L.: Maintaining Organization in a Dynamic Long-Term Memory. Cognitive Science 7(4), 243–280 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Looney, C.G., et al.: Cognitive situation and threat assessments of ground battlespaces. Information Fusion 4, 297–308 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Looney, C.G.: Exploring fusion architecture for a common operational picture. J. Information Fusion (article in press)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schank, R.: Dynamic memory: a theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. Cambridge University Press, UK (1982)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steinberg, A.N., et al.: Revisions to the JDL data fusion model. In: Proceedings of the SPIE. Sensor Fusion: Architectures, Algorithms and Applications, pp. 430–441 (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manish Gupta
    • 1
  • Sumant Mukherjee
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Systems Studies and AnalysesDefence Research & Development OrganisationDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations