Skip to main content

Canonical Correspondence Analysis in Social Science Research

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Classification as a Tool for Research

Abstract

The use of simple and multiple correspondence analysis is well established in social science research for understanding relationships between two or more categorical variables. By contrast, canonical correspondence analysis, which is a correspondence analysis with linear restrictions on the solution, has become one of the most popular multivariate techniques in ecological research. This restricted form of correspondence analysis can be used profitably in social science research as well, as is demonstrated in this paper. We first illustrate the result that canonical correspondence analysis of an indicator matrix, restricted to be related to an external categorical variable, reduces to a simple correspondence analysis of a set of concatenated (or “stacked”) tables. Then we show how canonical correspondence analysis can be used to focus on, or partial out, a particular set of response categories in sample survey data. For example, the method can be used to partial out the influence of missing responses, which usually dominate the results of a multiple correspondence analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Greenacre, M. (2007). Correspondence Analysis in Practice (2nd ed.). London: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2007. Published in Spanish translation as La Práctica del Análisis de Correspondencias, Fundación BBVA, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenacre, M., & Pardo, R. (2006). Subset correspondence analysis: Visualization of selected response categories in a questionnaire survey. Sociological Methods and Research, 35, 193–218.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Greenacre, M., & Pardo, R. (2006). Multiple correspondence analysis of subsets of response categories. In M. Greenacre & J. Blasius (Eds.), Multiple correspondence analysis and related methods (pp. 197–217). London: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greenacre, M., & Pardo, R. (2008). Positioning the “middle” categories in survey research: A multidimensional approach. Keynote address at the joint conference of the European Methodology Association and the SMABS, Oviedo, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISSP. (1994). Family and changing gender roles II. International social survey programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matschinger, H., & Angermeyer, M. C. (2006). The evaluation of “dont know” responses by generalized canonical analysis. In M. Greenacre & J. Blasius (Eds.), Multiple correspondence analysis and related methods (pp. 283–298). London: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishisato, S. (1984). Forced classification: A simple application of a quantification technique. Psychometrika, 49, 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak, C. J. F. (1986). Canonical correspondence analysis: A new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology, 67, 1167–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Greenacre .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Greenacre, M. (2010). Canonical Correspondence Analysis in Social Science Research. In: Locarek-Junge, H., Weihs, C. (eds) Classification as a Tool for Research. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10745-0_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics