Abstract
Before discussing the new program of Progressive Development it is important to analyze the wider theoretical basis on which the conceptual model of Malthus was based. As mentioned in arguing against Condorcet and Godwin he claimed that his predictions are based on observations and calculations, while the works which he debated were written as philosophical speculative essays. Malthus’ methodology has set the foundations of modern science of economics and no wonder that the his essay, albeit written about 200 years ago, is obligatory reading for every student of economics and is still included in the reference list of modern articles about economics. On the other hand, the forecast of Condorcet, which was written by a leading mathematician, was based on intuitive ideas and ideals, rather than observations and calculations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
M. J. A. de Condorect, pp. 9–10, 128, 136, 140–142, 173–175.
- 2.
- 3.
A hand-powered multiple spinning machine that was the first machine to spin more than one ball of yarn or thread.
References
M. J. A. de Condorect, Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind, trans. June Barraclough, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London, pp. 4–5 (1955).
J. Salk, The Survival of the Wisest, Harper and Row, New York/London (1973).
A. S. Issar and R. G. Colodny, From Primeval Chaos to Infinite Intelligence – Information as a Dimension and Entropy as a Field of Force, Ashgate, Avebury (1995).
A. S. Issar, Evolution of intelligence in the Bio-World. In: R. Gordon and J. Seckbach (eds.), Divine Action and Natural Selection: Questions of Science and Faith in BiologicalEvolution, World Scientific, Singapore (2008).
M. Kakimba, Rwanda in her Vision, The New Times Publications Sarl, Kigali–Rwanda, Friday 4 August (2006).
M. Ricciuti, The $100 Laptop Moves Closer to Reality, CNET News.com, September 28 (2005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Issar, A.S. (2010). The Theoretical Basis Behind the Falsification of the Theory of Malthus and Verification of Condorcet’s Confuted Model. In: Issar, A. (eds) Progressive Development. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10640-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10640-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10639-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10640-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)