Abstract
The determination of global gravity potential models is a central issue in Geodesy. In principle the existence of solutions, i.e. of harmonic potentials, given certain boundary conditions, depends on the solvability of certain boundary value problems (BVP) for the Laplace equation, an item that has recently received quite an impulse in terms of abstract theorems. Yet, the real problem is that of approximating such solutions. In general, least squares (l.s.) in Hilbert spaces can give an easy and converging solution to such a problem. Yet, l.s. is very demanding from the numerical point of view because of the notable variability of the boundary, be it the actual surface of the earth or the telluroid. Another, somewhat simpler, technique to approximate a BVP is the so called Galerkin method. The relation between the l.s. and Galerkin is analyzed and clarified. Finally, one has to recognize that in reality the true method used in geodesy to construct approximations is the use of the downward continuation followed by orthogonality relations. The paper shows that this geodetic approach can be seen as an approximation of the solution of Galerkin’s system and, at the same time, as an accelerator of the so called change of boundary method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cimmino, G. (1940). Sul problema generalizzato di Dirichlet per l’equazione di Poisson. Rend. Sem. Mat. Padova, 11, 28–89.
Cimmino, G. (1952). Sulle equazioni differenziali alle derivate parziali di tipo ellittico, Rend. Sem. Mat. Fis. Milano, XIII, 183–203.
Klees, R. (1997). Topics on boundary element methods, Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, Vol. 65, Springer, Berlin.
Lehmann, R. (1997). Solving geodetic boundary value problems with parallel computers, Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, Vol. 65, 532–540.
Magenes, E. (1955). Sui problemi di derivata obliqua regolare per le equazioni lineari del 2. ordine di tipo ellittico. Ann. Mat. Pura e Appl., 40, 143–160.
Martinec, Z. (1998). Boundary-Value Problems for the Gravimetric Determination of a Precise Geoid, Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, Vol. 73, Springer, Berlin, pp. 482–427.
Moritz, H. (1989). Advanced physical geodesy. 2nd Edition, Wichmann, Karlsruhe.
Sansò, F. and G. Sona (1995). Gravity Reductions versus Approximate B.V.P.’s, In: Geodetic Theory Today, IAG Symposia 114, Springer.
Sansò, F. and G. Venuti (2008). On the explicit determination of stability constants for linearized geodetic boundary value problems. J. Geod., 82, 909–916.
Wenzel, H.-G. (1998). Ultra-high degree geopotential models GPM98A, B and C to degree 1800, in Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the International Gravity Commission and International Geoid Commission, Trieste, Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sacerdote, F., Sansò, F. (2010). Least Squares, Galerkin and BVPs Applied to the Determination of Global Gravity Field Models. In: Mertikas, S. (eds) Gravity, Geoid and Earth Observation. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 135. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10634-7_68
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10634-7_68
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10633-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10634-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)