ACE2: The New Global Digital Elevation Model
- 2.2k Downloads
Detailed accurate Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data have historically not been available on other than a regional scale, and often have uncertainties in both vertical and horizontal precision.
This paper presents the results of a global assessment of the unique Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) DEM using more than 100 million height datapoints derived from ERS1, ERS2, Topex, EnviSat and Jason-1 radar altimeter data, retracked using an expert system approach. This paper outlines the retracking approach taken to derive heights from the altimeter waveforms and describes the methodology for fusion of these data with the SRTM dataset, correcting errors in the SRTM heights and providing accurate measurements beyond the SRTM latitude limit, to produce a full global DEM.
Of particular interest, the unique ability of radar altimeters to provide very precise vertical measurements has allowed the correction of vertical offsets to better than 1 m within ACE2, and has also allowed identification of horizontal misplacements. As part of this development, a detailed quality matrix is being generated, to give users information both on the data source of each pixel, and an assessment of the vertical precision of the measurement. It is this detailed global assessment of quality that makes the ACE2 development both unique and of special value for a range of geodetic applications.
The first full release of ACE2 is scheduled for later in 2008.
KeywordsAltimetry Digital elevation model (DEM) Shuttle radar topographic mission (SRTM)
The authors wish to acknowledge ESA, NASA, JPL and CNES for supply of data used in this development.
- Algiers, J. (1993). TOPEX ground system software interface specification, (SIS-2) altimeter sensor data record (SDR) – Alt SDR data (NASA), March, 1993, JPL D-8591 (Rev. C), TOPEX 633-751-23-001, Rev. C.Google Scholar
- Benada, R. and S. Digby (1997). TOPEX/POSEIDON altimeter merged geophysical data record generation B (NASA/PO.DAAC), JPL PO.DAAC 068.D002. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA.Google Scholar
- Benveniste, J., S. Baker, O. Bombaci, C. Zeli, P. Venditti, O.Z. Zanife, B. Soussi, J.P. Dumont, J.P. Stum, and M. Milagro-Perez (2002). ENVISAT RA-2/MWR product handbook, Issue 1.2, PO-TN-ESR-RA-0050. European Space Agency, Frascati, Italy.Google Scholar
- Brown, C.G., Jr., K. Sarabandi, and L.E. Pierce (2005). “Validation of the shuttle radar topography mission height data,” geoscience and remote sensing. IEEE Trans., 43(8), 1707–1715, August 2005.Google Scholar
- CA. Capp, P. (2001). Altimeter waveform product ALT.WAP compact user guide, Issue 4.0, PF-UG-NRL AL-0001, Infoterra Ltd., UK.Google Scholar
- Denker, S. (2004). Evaluation of SRTM3 and GTOPO30 terrain data in Germany. In: Jekeli C. et al. (eds), International association of geodesy symposia, gravity, geoid and space missions, Vol 129. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 218–223.Google Scholar
- Hensley, S., P. Rosen, and E. Gurrola (2000). “The SRTM topographic mapping processor,” Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2000. Proceedings. IGARSS 2000. IEEE 2000 Int., 3, 1168–1170.Google Scholar
- Hilton, R.D., W.E. Featherstone, P.A.M. Berry, C.P.D. Johnson, and J.F. Kirby (2003). Comparison of digital elevation models over Australia and external validation using ERS-1 satellite radar altimetry. Aust. J. Earth Sci., 50(2), 157–168(12), April 2003, DOI:10.1046/j.1440-0952.2003.00982.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lemoine, F.G., D.E. Smith, L. Kunz, R. Smith, E.C. Pavlis, N.K. Pavlis, S.M. Klosko, D.S. Chinn, M.H. Torrence, R.G. Williamson, C.M. Cox, K.E. Rachlin, Y.M. Wang, S.C. Kenyon, R. Salmon, R. Trimmer, R.H. Rapp, and R.S. Nerem (1997). The development of the NASA GSFC and NIMA joint geopotential model. In: Segawa, J. et al. (eds), International association of geodest symposia, gravity, geoid and marine geodesy, vol 117. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 461–469.Google Scholar
- Zanife, O.Z., J.P. Dumont, J. Stum, and T. Guinle (2004), SSALTO Products Specifications – Volume 1: Jason-1 User Products, Issue 3.1, SMM-ST-M-EA-10879-CN, CLS/CNES. Toulouse, France.Google Scholar