Skip to main content

A Distance Metric for Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithms Using User-Preferences

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5866))

Abstract

In this paper we propose to use a distance metric based on user-preferences to efficiently find solutions for many-objective problems. In a user-preference based algorithm a decision maker indicates regions of the objective-space of interest, the algorithm then concentrates only on those regions to find solutions. Existing user-preference based evolutionary many-objective algorithms rely on the use of dominance comparisons to explore the search-space. Unfortunately, this is ineffective and computationally expensive for many-objective problems. The proposed distance metric allows an evolutionary many-objective algorithm’s search to be focused on the preferred regions, saving substantial computational cost. We demonstrate how to incorporate the proposed distance metric with a user-preference based genetic algorithm, which implements the reference point and light beam search methods. Experimental results suggest that the distance metric based algorithm is effective and efficient, especially for difficult many-objective problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratab, A., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6, 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Köppen, M., Vicente-Garcia, R., Nickolay, B.: Fuzzy-pareto-dominance and its application in evolutionary multi-objective optimization. In: Coello Coello, C.A., Hernández Aguirre, A., Zitzler, E. (eds.) EMO 2005. LNCS, vol. 3410, pp. 399–412. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kukkonen, S., Lampinen, J.: Ranking-dominance and many-objective optimization. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 3983–3990 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sülflow, A., Drechsler, N., Drechsler, R.: Robust multi-objective optimization in high dimensional spaces. In: Obayashi, S., Deb, K., Poloni, C., Hiroyasu, T., Murata, T. (eds.) EMO 2007. LNCS, vol. 4403, pp. 715–726. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Deb, K., Kumar, A.: Light beam search based multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deb, K., Sundar, J.: Reference point based multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. In: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO), pp. 635–642. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wickramasinghe, U.K., Li, X.: Integrating user preferences with particle swarms for multi-objective optimization. In: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO), pp. 745–752. ACM, New York (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Ehrgott, M., Gandibleux, X.: Multiple Criteria Optimization: State of the Art Annotated Bibliographic Survey. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 52. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miettinen, K.: Some methods for nonlinear multi-objective optimization. In: Zitzler, E., Deb, K., Thiele, L., Coello Coello, C.A., Corne, D.W. (eds.) EMO 2001. LNCS, vol. 1993, pp. 1–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jaszkiewicz, A., Slowinski, R.: The light beam search approach -an overview of methodology and applications. European Journal of Operational Research 113, 300–314 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Zitzler, E., Deb, K., Thiele, L.: Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Empirical results. Evolutionary Computation 8, 173–195 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huband, S., Hingston, P., Barone, L., While, R.L.: A review of multiobjective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 10, 477–506 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deb, K., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Zitzler, E.: Scalable test problems for evolutionary multi-objective optimization. In: Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization (EMO): Theoretical Advances and Applications, pp. 105–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wickramasinghe, U.K., Li, X. (2009). A Distance Metric for Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithms Using User-Preferences. In: Nicholson, A., Li, X. (eds) AI 2009: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5866. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10439-8_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10439-8_45

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10438-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10439-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics