Abstract
The waterfall life cycle model suffers from a number of problems but in spite of this, it continues to be the most widely used life cycle model. A different life cycle approach is proposed that emphasizes the product life cycle rather than the project life cycle, quality management priorities rather than project management priorities and views of quality rather than views of the project schedule. A quality management tool based on different views of quality is used to identify the “gaps” that inevitably exist between a user’s needs, the requirements specification and the product that is delivered. This is followed by a brief discussion of how these “gaps” can be closed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Laplante, P.A., Neill, C.J.: The Demise of the Waterfall Model and Other Urban Myths. Game Development 1(10) (February 2004)
Royce, W.: Managing the Development of Large Software Systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE WESCON (1970)
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK), The Project Management Institute (also available as IEEE Std 1490-2003) (2000)
Beck, K.: eXtreme Programming explained. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)
Powell, R.R.: Wabi Sabi Simple, Adams Media (2004)
AS 2561-1982: Guide to the determination and use of quality costs, Standards Australia (1982)
Garviv, D.: What Does ’Product Quality’ Really Mean? Sloan Management Review, 25–45 (Fall 1984)
George, M.L., et al.: The Lean Six Sigma Pocket Toolbook: A Quick Reference Guide to 100 Tools for Improving Quality and Speed. McGraw-Hill, New York (2004)
Boehm, B.: Escaping the software tar pit: model clashes and how to avoid them. In: SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, January 1999, vol. 24 (1999)
Glossary of Software Testing Terms, http://www.testingstandards.co.uk/glossary.htm (retrieved on August 1, 2008)
IEEE Std 1028-1997 IEEE Standard for Software Reviews, Institute of Electrical Engineers (1992)
OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Superstructure, V2.1.2, Object management Group, OMG (2007)
Bersoff, E.H.: Elements of Software, Configuration Management. In: Dorfman, M., Thayer, R.H. (eds.) Software Engineering, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1997)
Peng, W.W., Wallace, D.R.: Software Error Analysis. NIST Special Publication 500-209 (1993)
Beizer, B.: Software Testing Techniques. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1990)
Boehm, B.: A spiral model of software development and enhancement. In: SIGSOFT Software Engineering (1986)
Cosby, P.: Quality is Free, New American Library (1979)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Robinson, P. (2009). The Triangular Life Cycle Model. In: Papasratorn, B., Chutimaskul, W., Porkaew, K., Vanijja, V. (eds) Advances in Information Technology. IAIT 2009. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 55. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10392-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10392-6_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10391-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10392-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)