Advertisement

Intelligent Experiment Design-Based Virtual Remote Sensing Laboratory

  • Yuriy Shkvarko
  • Stewart Santos
  • Jose Tuxpan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5856)

Abstract

We address unified intelligent descriptive experiment design regularization (DEDR) methodology for computer-aided investigation of new intelligent signal processing (SP) perspectives for collaborative remote sensing (RS) and distributed sensor network (SN) data acquisition, intelligent processing and information fusion. The sophisticated “Virtual RS Laboratory” (VRSL) software elaborated using the proposed DEDR methodology is presented. The VRLS provides the end-user with efficient computational tools to perform numerical simulations of different RS imaging problems. Computer simulation examples are reported to illustrate the usefulness of the elaborated VRSL for the algorithmic-level investigation of high-resolution image formation, enhancement, fusion and post-processing tasks performed with the artificial and real-world RS imagery.

Keywords

Computer simulations experiment design regularization remote sensing software 

References

  1. 1.
    Falkovich, S.E., Ponomaryov, V.I., Shkvarko, Y.V.: Optimal Reception of Space-Time Signals in Channels With Scattering (in Russian). Radio i Sviaz, Moscow (1989)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wehner, D.R.: High-Resolution Radar, 2nd edn. Artech House, Boston (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barrett, H.H., Myers, K.J.: Foundations of Image Science. Willey, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ishimary, A.: Wave Propagation and Scattering in Random Media. IEEE Press, NY (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shkvarko, Y.: Estimation of wavefield power distribution in the remotely sensed environment: Bayesian maximum entropy approach. IEEE Trans. Signal Proc. 50(9), 2333–2346 (2002)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shkvarko, Y.: Unifying regularization and Bayesian estimation methods for enhanced imaging with remotely sensed data—Part I: Theory. IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing 42(5), 923–931 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shkvarko, Y.: Unifying regularization and Bayesian estimation methods for enhanced imaging with remotely sensed data—Part II: Implementation and performance issues. IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing 42(5), 932–940 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shkvarko, Y.: From matched spatial filtering towards the fused statistical descriptive regularization method for enhanced radar imaging. EURASIP J. Applied Signal Processing 2006, 1–9 (2006) Article ID 39657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greco, M.S., Gini, F.: Statistical analysis of high-resolution SAR ground clutter data. IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing 45(3), 566–575 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shkvarko, Y., Perez-Meana, H., Castillo-Atoche, A.: Enhanced radar imaging in uncertain environment: A descriptive experiment design regularization approach. Int. J. Navigation and Observation 2008, 1–11 (2008) Article ID 810816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shkvarko, Y., Gutierrez-Rosas, J.A., de Guerrero Diaz Leon, L.G.: Towards the virtual remote sensing laboratory: Simulation software for intelligent post-processing of large scale remote sensing imagery. In: Proc. IEEE Intern. Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IGARSS 2007, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 1561–1564 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Space Imaging, GeoEye Inc. (2009), http://www.spaceimaging.com/quicklook

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuriy Shkvarko
    • 1
  • Stewart Santos
    • 1
  • Jose Tuxpan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringCINVESTAV-IPNGuadalajaraMexico

Personalised recommendations