Abstract
Early detection and accurate characterization of the extent of recurrent disease are important in identifying patients who might be candidates for local resection, pelvic exenteration, or radiotherapy for nonresectable disease. CT and MRI can demonstrate the site and extent of recurrence after surgery. CT is widely available, but the superior soft tissue contrast of MRI allows for a better assessment of the local extent of recurrent tumor. To evaluate widespread recurrence, CT is preferred. It is important to distinguish postradiation changes from recurrent tumor and CT remains limited in this regard. MRI has high sensitivity but low specificity for recurrent disease, because benign conditions such as edema, inflammation, and necrosis also may cause an increased T2 signal mimicking residual tumor. Functional imaging using dynamic multiphase contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) help increase the reader’s confidence for detecting recurrent disease in uterine malignancies. In detecting recurrent lesions and evaluating treatment responses, FDG-PET, used in conjunction with anatomic information from CT or MRI, showed a better diagnostic ability than conventional imaging and tumor markers. FDG-PET also can be useful in women who present with elevated markers but negative conventional imaging. Imaging has become an important adjunct to the assessment of uterine malignancy. Imaging findings of these modalities may be the first sign of recurrent disease and they can be used to recommend suitable candidates for exenteration, additional radiation therapy, or chemotherapy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Suggested Reading
Akin O, Mironov S, Pamdit-Taskar N, et al. Imaging of uterine cancer. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007;45:167–82.
Choi JI, Kim SH, Seong CK, et al. Recurrent uterine cervical carcinoma: spectrum of imaging findings. Korean J Radiol. 2000;1:198–207.
Crawford RAF, Richards PJ, Reznek RH, et al. The role of CT in predicting the surgical feasibility of exenteration in recurrent carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1996;6:231–4.
Ebner F, Kressel HY, Mintz MC, et al. Tumor recurrence versus fibrosis in the female pelvis: differentiation with MR imaging at 1.5T. Radiology. 1988;166:333–40.
Engin G. Cervical cancer: MR imaging findings before, during, and after radiation therapy. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:313–24.
Fulcher AS, O’Sullivan SG, Segreti EM, et al. Recurrent cervical carcinoma: typical and atypical manifestations. Radiographics. 1999;19:S103–6.
Hricak H, Swift PS, Campos Z, et al. Irradiation of the cervix uteri: value of unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 1993;189:381–8.
Jeong YY, Kang HK, Chung TW, et al. Uterine cervical carcinoma after therapy: CT and MR imaging findings. Radiographics. 2003;23:969–80.
Kim KH. Assessment of therapeutic response and recurrence of malignancies of the female pelvis. In: Lang EK, editor. Radiology of the female pelvic organs. Berlin: Springer; 1998. p. 111–40.
Kim YB, Niloff JM. Endometrial carcinoma: analysis of recurrence in patients treated with a strategy minimizing lymph node sampling and radiation therapy. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:175–80.
Kim SH, Kim SC, Choi BI, et al. Uterine cervical carcinoma: evaluation of pelvic lymph node metastasis with MR imaging. Radiology. 1994;190:807–11.
Kinkel K, Ariche M, Tardivon AA, et al. Differentiation between recurrent tumor and benign conditions after treatment of gynecologic pelvic carcinoma: value of dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging. Radiology. 1997;204:55–63.
Kostakoglu L, Agress Jr H, Goldsmith SJ. Clinical role of FDG PET in evaluation of cancer patients. Radiographics. 2003;23:315–40.
Larson DM, Copeland LJ, Stringer CA, et al. Recurrent cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 1988;30:381–7.
Nielsen SN, Podratz KC, Scheithauer BW, et al. Clinicopathologic analysis of uterine malignant mixed Müllerian tumors. Gynecol Oncol. 1989;34:372–8.
Park DH, Kim KH, Park SY, et al. Diagnosis of recurrent uterine cervical cancer: computed tomography versus positron emission tomography. Korean J Radiol. 2000;1:51–5.
Popovich MJ, Hricak H, Sugimura K, et al. The role of MR imaging in determining surgical eligibility for pelvic exenteration. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160:525–31.
Reddy S, Lee MS, Hendrickson FR. Pattern of recurrences in endometrial carcinoma and their management. Radiology. 1979;133:737–40.
Rob L, Pluta M, Strnad P, et al. A less radical treatment option to the fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111:S116–20.
Sala E, Rockall A, Rangarajan D, et al. The role of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the female pelvis. Eur J Radiol. 2010;76:367–85.
Shield PW, Wright RG, Free K, et al. The accuracy of cervicovaginal cytology in the detection of recurrent cervical carcinoma following radiotherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 1991;41:223–9.
Shingleton HM, Soong SJ, Gelder MS, et al. Clinical and histopathologic factors predicting recurrence and survival after pelvic exenteration for cancer of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;73:1027–34.
Sugimura K, Okizuka H. Postsurgical pelvis: treatment follow-up. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002;40:659–80.
Takehara K, Shigemasa K, Sawasaki T, et al. Recurrence of invasive cervical carcinoma more than 5 years after initial therapy. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:680–4.
Weber TM, Sostman HD, Spritzer CE, et al. Cervical carcinoma: determination of recurrent tumor extent versus radiation changes with MR imaging. Radiology. 1995;194:135–9.
Williams MP, Husband JE, Heron CW, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in recurrent carcinoma of the cervix. Br J Radiol. 1989;62:544–50.
Yuan C, Wang P, Lai C, et al. Recurrence and survival analyses of 1115 cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1999;47:127–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jung, D.C., Kim, K.H. (2012). Introduction. In: Kim, S. (eds) Radiology Illustrated: Gynecologic Imaging. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05325-2_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05325-2_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05323-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-05325-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)