Abstract
Without the luxury of a fully reconstructed b-hadron state, to make progress in b-physics, one is at the mercy of detector design and performance. As we have seen, precision tracking and a particle identification capability are prerequisites to be able to reconstruct the underlying physics event from the particles that make it through the detection-reconstruction chain. The experimenter must use the detector information available to make a selection of the particles that are most likely to be involved in the process of interest. This selection procedure could take the form of simply cutting away those particles whose parameter values fall outside of predetermined bounds. This cut-based approach has been traditionally the main technique of data analysis in high energy physics and its simplicity can produce measurements that are well ‘understood’ i.e. with a low systematic uncertainity. However, the performance of this method is best when applied to variables that (a) provide excellent discrimination and (b) are uncorrelated. This follows since cutting on a variable that shows only a weak discrimination will lead to a low selection efficiency and high background, whereas highly correlated variables bring no extra information to an analysis and so cannot improve the performance. Furthermore, rejecting particles from an analysis in this way assumes that they are all independent of each other which is often not the case e.g. measurements of track impact parameters, referenced to the reconstructed primary vertex position, are correlated between those tracks that formed part of the primary vertex fit. For these reasons, cut-based analyses tend to be restricted to the use of a few, high performance, variables that have small correlations between them.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
This is a ‘S’-shaped turn-on function, \(\frac{1}{1+\exp^{-Ax}}\) where x is the sum of all input weights to the node and A is a tuned parameter controlling the sharpness of the turn-on.
- 2.
b-hadron direction and energy resolutions typically consist of a Gaussian part describing most of the data plus some broader, often non-Gaussian, component accounting for the rest.
- 3.
Note that \(\textrm{B}_\textrm{s}^{0}\) mesons oscillate many times during an average lifetime and so in this case, the decay flavour tag has no correlation with the production flavour and would be removed from the input definition i.e. \(I_{\textrm{B}_\textrm{s}} = F(\textrm{hem.})_{\textrm{B}_\textrm{s}}^{\textrm{frag.}} \cdot P_{\textrm{B}_\textrm{s}}\).
- 4.
Since the flavour tags are symmetric distributions about zero, these plots are obtained by cutting in a symmetric band around zero to larger and larger tag values. The purity is then the fraction of all hemispheres passing the cut that are correctly tagged and the x-axis is the fraction of correct tags out of the total possible.
References
C. Peterson: Pattern recognition in high energy physics with neural networks. In: Proceedings, Erice91, QCD at 200 TeV, Ettore Majorana Int. Sci. Ser., Physical sci., vol 60, L. Cifarelli, Y. Dokshitzer eds. Plenum, New York (1992) pp. 149–163
OPAL Collab., K. Ackerstaff et al.: Zeit. Phys. C 73, 397 (1997)
OPAL Collab., G. Abbiendi et al.: Eur. Phys. J. C 8, 217 (1999)
OPAL Collab., G. Abbiendi et al.: Phys. Lett. B 482, 15 (2000)
ALEPH Collab., R. Barate et al.: Phys. Lett. B 492, 259 (2000)
Z. Albrecht, T. Allmendinger, G. Barker, M. Feindt, C. Haag, M. Moch: BSAURUS-A Package For Inclusive B-Reconstruction in DELPHI., hep-ex/0102001 (2001)
K. Hagiwara et al.: Phys. Rev. D 66, 010001 (2002) and 2003 off-year partial update for the 2004 edition available on the PDG WWW pages (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov/)
ALEPH Collab., D. Buskulic et al.: Phys. Lett. B 278, 209 (1992)
DELPHI Collab., P. Abreu et al.: Phys. Lett. B 289, 199 (1992)
Z. Albrecht, G.J. Barker, M. Feindt, U. Kerzel, M. Moch: A Study of Excited b-hadron States with the DELPHI Detector at LEP, contribution to EPS 2003, Aachen, DELPHI 2003-029-CONF-649
ALEPH Collab., D. Buskulic et al.: Z. Phys. C 69, 393 (1996)
OPAL Collab., R. Akers et al.: Z Phys. C 66, 19 (1995)
OPAL Collab., G. Abbiendi et al.: Eur. Phys. J. C 23, 437 (2002)
OPAL Collab., R. Akers et al.: Z. Phys. C 66, 19 (1995)
DELPHI Collab., P. Abreu et al.: Phys. Lett. B 345, 598 (1995)
ALEPH Collab., D. Buskulic et al.: Z. Phys. C 69, 393 (1996)
L3 Collab., M. Acciarri et al.: Phys. Lett. B 465, 323 (1999)
ALEPH Collab., R. Barate et al.: Phys. Lett. B 425, 215 (1998)
G.J. Barker: B Production and Oscillations at DELPHI. In: Proceedings of the International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Aachen (2003)
M. Moch: In: Proceedings of the EPS International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, Lisbon, 2005, Proc. Sci. HEP2005 232 (2006)
CDF Collab., T. Aaltonen et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 102003 (2009)
CDF Collab., T. Aaltonen et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 082001 (2008)
DELPHI Collab., J. Abdallah et al.: Eur. Phys. J. C 33, 307 (2004)
K. Amsler et al.: Phys. Lett. B 667, 1 (2008)
OPAL Collab., G. Abbiendi et al.: Eur. Phys. J. C 12, 609 (2000)
DELPHI Collab., P. Abreu et al.: Zeit Phys. C 71, 539 (1996)
ALEPH Collab., A. Heister et al.: Phys. Lett. B 512, 30 (2001)
OPAL Collab., G. Abbiendi et al.: Eur. Phys. J. C 29, 463 (2003)
DELPHI Collab.: A Study of the b-quark fragmentation function with the DELPHI detector at LEP I and an averaged distribution at the Z0 pole, to be submitted to Eur. Phys. J
V. Blobel: The RUN manual: Regularized Unfolding for High-Energy Physics, OPAL Technical Note TN361 (1996)
V. Blobel: Unfolding Methods In High-Energy Physics Experiments, DESY 84-118 (1984)
V. Blobel: In Proceedings of the 1984 CERN School of Computing, CERN 85-02 (1985)
K. Abe et al.: Phys. Rev. D 65, 092006 (2002)
B. Andersson, G. Gustafson, B. Soderberg: Z. Phys. C 20, 317 (1983)
DELPHI Collab., J. Abdallah et al.: Eur. Phys. J. C 40, 1 (2005)
G.J. Barker, M. Feindt, U. Kerzel, L. Ramler: A Study of the b-Quark Fragmentation Function with the DELPHI Detector at LEP 1, contribution to ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam, DELPHI 2002-069-CONF-603
DELPHI Collab., J. Abdallah et al.: Phys. Lett. B 561, 26 (2003)
DELPHI Collab., J. Abdallah et al.: Eur. Phys. J. C 28, 155 (2003)
DELPHI Collab., P. Abreu et al.: Phys. Lett. B 426, 193 (1998)
ALEPH Collab., R. Barate et al.: Eur. Phys. J. C 4, 387 (1998)
ALEPH, CDF, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD: Combined results on b-hadron production
CLEO Collab., B.C. Barish et al.: Phys. rev. Lett. 76, 1570 (1996)
M. Neubert, C.T. Sachradja: Nucl. Phys. B 483, 339 (1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barker, G.J. (2010). Optimal b-Flavour and b-Hadron Reconstruction. In: b-Quark Physics with the LEP Collider. Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, vol 236. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05279-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05279-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05278-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-05279-8
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)