Skip to main content

Nash Equilibria in Stabilizing Systems

  • Conference paper
Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems (SSS 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5873))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The objective of this paper is three-fold. First, we specify what it means for a fixed point of a stabilizing distributed system to be a Nash equilibrium. Second, we present methods that can be used to verify whether or not a given fixed point of a given stabilizing distributed system is a Nash equilibrium. Third, we argue that in a stabilizing distributed system, whose fixed points are all Nash equilibria, no process has an incentive to perturb its local state, after the system reaches one fixed point, in order to force the system to reach another fixed point where the perturbing process achieves a better gain. If the fixed points of a stabilizing distributed system are all Nash equilibria, then we refer to the system as perturbation-proof. Otherwise, we refer to the system as perturbation-prone. We identify four natural classes of perturbation-(proof/prone) systems. We present system examples for three of these classes of systems, and show that the fourth class is empty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nash, J.F.: Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 36, 48–49 (1950)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Flood, M.M.: Some experimental games. Management Science 5, 5–26 (1958)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhattacharya, A., Ghosh, S.: Self-optimizing peer-to-peer networks with selfish processes. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems, pp. 340–343 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, J., Dasgupta, A., Ghosh, S., Tixeuil, S.: An exercise in selfish stabilization. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. 3, 1–12 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arora, A., Gouda, M.: Closure and convergence: A foundation for fault-tolerant computing. IEEE Transactions on Computers 19, 1015–1027 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abraham, I., Dolev, D., Gonen, R., Halpern, J.: Distributed computing meets game theory: robust mechanisms for rational secret sharing and multiparty computation. In: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing, pp. 53–62. ACM, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Abraham, I., Dolev, D., Halpern, J.: Lower bounds on implementing robust and resilient mediators. In: Canetti, R. (ed.) TCC 2008. LNCS, vol. 4948, pp. 302–319. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Halpern, J.Y.: Beyond nash equilibrium: Solution concepts for the 21st century. In: van Breugel, F., Chechik, M. (eds.) CONCUR 2008. LNCS, vol. 5201, p. 1. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Dijkstra, E.W.: Self-stabilizing systems in spite of distributed control. Commun. ACM 17, 643–644 (1974)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Dolev, S.: Self-stabilization. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Gouda, M.G.: The triumph and tribulation of system stabilization. In: Helary, J.-M., Raynal, M. (eds.) WDAG 1995. LNCS, vol. 972, pp. 1–18. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Goddard, W., Hedetniemi, S.T., Jacobs, D.P., Srimani, P.K.: Self-stabilizing protocols for maximal matching and maximal independent sets for ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing, Washington, DC, USA, p. 162.2. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, S.T., Hung, S.S., Tzeng, C.H.: Self-stabilizing coloration in anonymous planar networks. Information Processing Letters 95, 307–312 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gouda, M.G., Acharya, H.B. (2009). Nash Equilibria in Stabilizing Systems. In: Guerraoui, R., Petit, F. (eds) Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems. SSS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5873. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05118-0_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05118-0_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05117-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-05118-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics