Skip to main content

A Reasoner for Simple Conceptual Logic Programs

  • Conference paper
Web Reasoning and Rule Systems (RR 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5837))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 302 Accesses

Abstract

Open Answer Set Programming (OASP) can be seen as a framework to represent tightly integrated combined knowledge bases of ontologies and rules that are not necessarily DL-safe. The framework makes the open-domain assumption and has a rule-based syntax supporting negation under a stable model semantics. Although decidability of different fragments of OASP has been identified, reasoning and effective algorithms remained largely unexplored. In this paper, we describe an algorithm for satisfiability checking of the fragment of simple Conceptual Logic Programs and provide a BProlog implementation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first implementation of a (fragment) of a framework that can tightly integrate ontologies and non-DL-safe rules under an expressive nonmonotonic semantics.

A preliminary version of this work, without the implementation, was presented at the 3rd Int. Workshop on Applications of Logic Programming to the (Semantic) Web and Web Services (ALPSWS 2008) for a limited audience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. RacerPro 1.9.0. Racer Systems GmbH & Co. KG, http://www.racer-systems.com/index.phtml

  2. BProlog 7.1. Afany software, http://www.probp.com/

  3. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Lukasiewicz, T., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H.: Combining answer set programming with description logics for the semantic web. Artificial Intelligence 172(12-13), 1495–1539 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Feier, C., Heymans, S.: A sound and complete algorithm for simple conceptual logic programs. Technical Report INFSYS Research Report 184-08-10, KBS Group, Technical University Vienna, Austria (October 2008), http://www.kr.tuwien.ac.at/staff/heymans/priv/projects/fwf-doasp/alpsws2008-tr.pdf

  6. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The Stable Model Semantics for Logic Programming. In: Proc. of ICLP 1988, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 1070–1080 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grosof, B.N., Horrocks, I., Volz, R., Decker, S.: Description logic programs: combining logic programs with description logic. In: Proc. of the World Wide Web Conference (WWW), pp. 48–57. ACM, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heymans, S., de Bruijn, J., Predoiu, L., Feier, C., Van Nieuwenborgh, D.: Guarded hybrid knowledge bases. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 8(3), 411–429 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Heymans, S., Van Nieuwenborgh, D., Vermeir, D.: Conceptual logic programs. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (Special Issue on Answer Set Programming) 47(1–2), 103–137 (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Heymans, S., Van Nieuwenborgh, D., Vermeir, D.: Open answer set programming for the semantic web. Journal of Applied Logic 5(1), 144–169 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Heymans, S., Van Nieuwenborgh, D., Vermeir, D.: Open answer set programming with guarded programs. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (TOCL) 9(4) (October 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krötzsch, M., Rudolph, S., Hitzler, P.: Description logic rules. In: Proc. 18th European Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2008), pp. 80–84. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lukasiewicz, T.: A novel combination of answer set programming with description logics for the semantic web. In: Franconi, E., Kifer, M., May, W. (eds.) ESWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4519, pp. 384–398. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Motik, B., Sattler, U., Studer, R.: Query answering for OWL-DL with rules. Journal of Web Semantics 3(1), 41–60 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rosati, R.: DL+log: Tight integration of description logics and disjunctive datalog. In: Proc. KR, pp. 68–78 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rosati, R.: On the decidability and complexity of integrating ontologies and rules. Journal of Web Semantics 3(1), 61–73 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tobies, S.: Complexity Results and Practical Algorithms for Logics in Knowledge Representation. PhD thesis (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Heymans, S., Feier, C., Eiter, T. (2009). A Reasoner for Simple Conceptual Logic Programs. In: Polleres, A., Swift, T. (eds) Web Reasoning and Rule Systems. RR 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5837. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05082-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05082-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05081-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-05082-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics