Skip to main content

FAHP-Based Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of M&S Credibility

  • Conference paper
Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Systems (ISICA 2009)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 51))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1648 Accesses

Abstract

Credibility evaluation of modeling and simulation (M&S) applications is becoming increasingly important as M&S applications get larger and more complex currently. To perform the M&S credibility evaluation efficiently, cost-effectively and successfully, this research establishes a hierarchical evaluation model of M&S credibility and proposes a methodology of FAHP-based fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE). Aslo a hierarchical evaluation model of M&S credibility is built up based on a detailed discussion of credibility evaluation indicators. Meanwhile a methodology of FAHP-based FCE model is introduced to reduce the effect of individual subjective judgment and favoritism on the evaluation results,. Finally, a case study is presented to prove the feasibility and validity of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balci, O., Adams, R.J., Myers, D.S., Nance, R.E.: A collaborative evaluation environment for credibility assessment of modeling and simulation applications. In: Yücesan, E., Chen, C.-H., Snowdon, J.L., Charnes, J.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 214–220. IEEE, Piscataway (2002a)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arthur, J.D., Sargent, R.G., Dbney, J.B., Law, A.M., Morrison, J.D.: Verification and validation: what impact should project size and complexity have on attendant V&V activities and supporting infrastructure. In: Farrington, P.A., Nembhard, H.B., Sturrock, D.T., Evans, G.W. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 148–155. IEEE, Phoenix (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Balci, O., Saadi, S.D.: Proposed standard processes for certification of modeling and simulation applications. In: Yücesan, E., Chen, C.-H., Snowdon, J.L., Charnes, J.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1622–1627. IEEE, Piscataway (2002b)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brade, D.: A generalized process for the verification and validation of models and simulation results. Phd dissertation, Universität Der Bundeswehr, München (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. DMSO.: DoD Verification, Validation, and Accreditation Recommended Practices Guide, millennium ed. Defense Modeling and Simulation Office, Alexandria (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fei, L., Yang, M., Wang, Z.: Study on simulation credibility metrics. In: Kuhl, M.E., Steiger, N.M., Armstrong, F.B., Joines, J.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 2554–2560. IEEE, Orlando (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. DMSO.: Department of Defense Verification, Validation and Accreditation (VV&A) Recommended Practices Guide. Defense Modeling and Simulation Office, Alexandria (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yujiong, G., Kunliang, C., Kun, Y.: Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method based on analytic hierarchy process for fault risk analysis of power plant equipment. In: Fifth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, pp. 443–448. IEEE, Jinan (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van, P.J., Laargoven, M., Pedrycz, W.: A fuzzy extension of saaty’s priority theory  11(3), 229 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yang, J.: Integrative Performance Evaluation for Strategic Supplier’s under Supply Chain Management based on Logarithm Triangular Fuzzy Number- AHP Method. In: Fifth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, pp. 311–316 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jing, W., Xiaoyan, W., Yanyan, Z.: Research on Design and Realization of Steering Flight Visual Simulation System. In: Asia Simulation Conference 2008/the 7th International Conference on System Simulation and Scientific Computing, pp. 1567–1570. IEEE, Beijing (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wu, J., Wu, Xy., Gao, Zc. (2009). FAHP-Based Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of M&S Credibility. In: Cai, Z., Li, Z., Kang, Z., Liu, Y. (eds) Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Systems. ISICA 2009. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 51. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04962-0_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04962-0_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04961-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04962-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics