Skip to main content

A Flexible Querying Approach Based on Outranking and Classification

  • Conference paper
Flexible Query Answering Systems (FQAS 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5822))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This article presents an approach to database flexible queries which relies on the notion of outranking and a classification process. Instead of being compared pairwise like in Pareto-order-based approaches, tuples are compared to acceptability profiles that are associated with predefined classes. According to their satisfaction of user preferences, tuples are assigned to classes with a certain degree. This approach proposes a classification algorithm with a linear complexity and makes it possible to aggregate non-commensurable preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agrawal, R., Wimmers, E.L.: A framework for expressing and combining preferences. In: Proc. of SIGMOD 2000, pp. 297–306 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bőrzsőnyi, S., Kossmann, D., Stocker, K.: The skyline operator. In: Proc. of the 17th IEEE Inter. Conf. on Data Engineering, pp. 421–430 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bosc, P., Pivert, O.: SQLf: A relational database language for fuzzy querying. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 3(1), 1–17 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Boutilier, C., Brafman, R., Domshlak, C., Hoos, H., Poole, D.: CP-nets: A tool for representing and reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements. J. Artif. Intell. Res (JAIR) 21, 135–191 (2004)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bouyssou, D.: Outranking methods. In: Encyclopedia of optimization (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brafman, R., Domshlak, C.: Database preference queries revisited. Technical report, TR2004-1934, Cornell University, Computing and Information Science (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chomicki, J.: Preference formulas in relational queries. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 28(4), 427–466 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dias, J.A., Figueira, J., Roy, B.: Electre tri-C: A multiple criteria sorting method based on central reference actions. Technical report, LAMSADE, Paris Dauphine (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Using fuzzy sets in flexible querying: Why and how? In: Proc. of the 1996 Workshop on Flexible Query-Answering Systems (FQAS 1996), pp. 89–103 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fagin, R.: Fuzzy queries in multimedia database systems. In: Proc. of PODS 1998, pp. 1–10 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hadjali, A., Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Database preferences queries – A possibilistic logic approach with symbolic priorities. In: Hartmann, S., Kern-Isberner, G. (eds.) FoIKS 2008. LNCS, vol. 4932, pp. 291–310. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kießling, W.: Foundations of preferences in database systems. In: Proc. of the 28th VLDB Conference (VLDB 2002), pp. 311–322 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kießling, W., Köstler, G.: Preference SQL — Design, implementation, experiences. In: Proc. of the 28th Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB 2002), pp. 990–1001 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Perny, P.: Multicriteria filtering methods based on concordance and non-discordance principles. Annals of Operations Research 80, 137–165 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Perny, P., Roy, B.: The use of fuzzy outranking relations in preference modelling. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 49(1), 33–53 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Roy, B.: The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory and Decision 31, 49–73 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Tardif, O., Smits, G.: Resolving coreference using an outranking approach. In: Proc. of RANLP (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Torlone, R., Ciaccia, P.: Finding the best when it’s a matter of preference. In: Proc. of the 10th Italian National Conf. on Advanced Data Base Systems (SEBD 2002), pp. 347–360 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bosc, P., Pivert, O., Smits, G. (2009). A Flexible Querying Approach Based on Outranking and Classification. In: Andreasen, T., Yager, R.R., Bulskov, H., Christiansen, H., Larsen, H.L. (eds) Flexible Query Answering Systems. FQAS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5822. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04957-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04957-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04956-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04957-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics