Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lymphadenektomie in der Pankreaschirurgie

  • Chapter
Hepatobiliäre und Pankreastumoren

  • 1446 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Das Pankreaskarzinom ist ein aggressiver Tumor, der zu einer frühzeitigen lymphogenen Dissemination neigt. Zum Operationszeitpunkt weisen über 50% der Patienten bereits makroskopische Lymphknotenmetastasen auf (Nagakawa et al. 1996). Neben klinisch pathologischen Merkmalen wie Tumorlokalisation, Durchmesser, DNAGehalt, Infiltration von Gefäßen und Perineuralscheiden, ist das Vorliegen von Lymphknotenmetastasen ein etablierter prognostischer Indikator (Geer et al. 1993).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Berger AC, Watson JC, Ross EA, et al. (2004) The metastatic/examined lymph node ratio is an important prognostic factor after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am Surg 70:235-40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cubilla AL, Fortner J, Fitzgeral PJ (1978) Lymph node involvement in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas area. Cancer 41:880-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farnell MB, Pearson RK, Sarr MG, et al. (2005) A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Surgery 138:618-28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fortner JG (1973) Regional resection of cancer of the pancreas: a new surgical approach. Surgery 73:307-20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geer RJ, Brennan MF(1993) Prognostic indicators for survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 165:68-72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hosch SB, Knoefel WT, Metz S, et al. (1997) Early lymphatic tumor cell dissemination in pancreatic cancer: frequency and prognostic significance. Pancreas. 15:154-9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Imaizumi T, Hanyu F, Harada N, et al. (1998) Extended radical Whipple resection for cancer of the pancreatic head: operative procedure and results. Dig Surg 15:299-307.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Isaji S, Kawarada Y, Uemoto S (2004) Classification of pancreatic cancer: comparison of Japanese and UICC classifications. Pancreas 28:231-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa O, Ohhigashi H, Sasaki Y, et al. (1988) Practical usefulness of lymphatic and connective tissue clearance for the carcinoma of the pancreas head. Ann Surg 208:215-20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa O, Wada H, Ohigashi H, et al. (2003) Postoperative cytology for drained fluid from the pancreatic bed after «curative» resection of pancreatic cancers: does it predict both the patient’s prognosis and the site of cancer recurrence? Ann Surg. 238:103-10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • JPS, Japan Pancreas Society (2003) Classification of Pancreatic Carcinoma (2nd edn.) Kanehara: Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Kobayashi H, et al. (1992) Lymphatic flow in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Cancer. 70:2061-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Ohta T, et al. (1999) Analysis of paraaortic lymph node involvement in pancreatic carcinoma: a significant indication for surgery? Cancer. 85:583-90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer B, Vogel I, Luttges J, et al. (1999) Surgical possibilities for pancreatic cancer: extended resection. Ann Oncol. 10 Suppl 4:252-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manabe T, Ohshio G, Baba N, et al. (1989) Cancer Radical pancreatectomy for ductal cell carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Cancer. 64:1132-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagakawa T, Konishi I, Ueno K, et al. (1993) A clinical study on lymphatic flow in carcinoma of the pancreatic head area—peripancreatic regional lymph node grouping. Hepatogastroenterology 40:457-62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagakawa T, Nagamori M, Futakami F, et al. (1996) Results of extensive surgery for pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer. 77:640-5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nakao A, Harada A, Nonami T (1997) Lymph node metastasis in carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. Br J Surg. 84:1090-2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nakao A, Takeda S, Sakai M, et al (2004) Extended radical resection versus standard resection for pancreatic cancer: The rationale for extended radical resection. Pancreas 28:289-92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peiper M, Boelke E, Orth K, Hosch SB, Rehders A, Matthaei H, Knoefel WT (2007) Current status of radical systematic lymphadenectomy in pancreatic cancer – a review of the literature. Eur J Med Res. 12:47-53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrazzoli S, Beger HG, Obertop H, et al. (1999) A surgical and pathological based classification of resective treatment of pancreatic cancer. Summary of an international workshop on surgical procedures in pancreatic cancer. Dig Surg. 16:337-45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrazzoli S, DiCarlo V, Dionigi R, et al. (1998) Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group. Ann Surg. 228:508-17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riall TS, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. (2005) Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma– part 3: update on 5-year survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 9:1191-204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richter A, Niedergethmann M, Sturm JW, et al. (2003) Long-term results of partial pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: 25-year experience.World J Surg. 27:324-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai M, Nakao A, Kaneko T, et al. (2005) Para-aortic lymph node metastasis in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Surgery 137:606-11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schniewind B, Bestmann B, Henne-Bruns D, et al. (2006) Quality of life after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. Br J Surg 93:1099-107.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz RE, Smith DD. (2006) Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: information from a large US population database. Ann Surg Oncol 13:1189-200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Sato T, et al. (2006) The role of paraaortic lymph node involvement on early recurrence and survival after macroscopic curative resection with extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma.J Am Coll Surg. 203:345-52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sierzega M, Popiela T, Kulig J, et al. (2006) The ratio of metastatic/resected lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor in patients with node-positive pancreatic head cancer. Pancreas 33:240-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sperti C, Pasquali C, Piccoli A, et al. (1997) Recurrence after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.World J Surg. 21:195-200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorban S, Roder JD, Siewert JR. (1999) Detection of micrometastasis in bone marrow of pancreatic cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 10 Suppl 4:111-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todoroki T, Koike N, Morishita Y, et al. (2003) Patterns and predictors of failure after curative resections of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg Oncol. 10:1176-83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Traverso LW. (2006) Pancreatic cancer: surgery alone is not sufficient. Surg Endosc. 20 Suppl 2:S446-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner M, Radaelli C, Lietz M, et al. (2004) Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 91:586-94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. (2002) Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality. Ann Surg 236:355-68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf

    Dr. med. A. Rehders, Prof. Dr. med. M. Peiper & Prof. Dr. med. W.T. Knoefel

Authors
  1. Dr. med. A. Rehders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr. med. M. Peiper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Prof. Dr. med. W.T. Knoefel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rehders, A., Peiper, M., Knoefel, W. (2010). Lymphadenektomie in der Pankreaschirurgie. In: Hepatobiliäre und Pankreastumoren. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04935-4_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04935-4_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04934-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04935-4

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation