Abstract
Module extraction methods have proved to be effective in improving the performance of some ontology reasoning tasks, including finding justifications to explain why an entailment holds in an OWL DL ontology. However, the existing module extraction methods that compute a syntactic locality-based module for the sub-concept in a subsumption entailment, though ensuring the resulting module to preserve all justifications of the entailment, may be insufficient in improving the performance of finding all justifications. This is because a syntactic locality-based module is independent of the super-concept in a subsumption entailment and always contains all concept/role assertions. In order to extract smaller modules to further optimize finding all justifications in an OWL DL ontology, we propose a goal-directed method for extracting a module that preserves all justifications of a given entailment. Experimental results on large ontologies show that a module extracted by our method is smaller than the corresponding syntactic locality-based module, making the subsequent computation of all justifications more scalable and more efficient.
Chapter PDF
References
Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Baader, F., Suntisrivaraporn, B.: Debugging SNOMED CT using axiom pinpointing in the description logic \(\mathcal{EL}^+\). In: Proc. of KR-MED 2008 (2008)
Biere, A., Sinz, C.: Decomposing SAT problems into connected components. Journal on Satisfiability, Boolean Modeling and Computation 2, 201–208 (2006)
Doran, P., Tamma, V.A.M., Iannone, L.: Ontology module extraction for ontology reuse: an ontology engineering perspective. In: Proc. of CIKM 2007, pp. 61–70 (2007)
Eiter, T., Leone, N., Mateis, C., Pfeifer, G., Scarcello, F.: A deductive system for non-monotonic reasoning. In: Dix, J., Fuhrbach, U., Nerode, A. (eds.) LPNMR 1997. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1265, pp. 364–375. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
Fitting, M.: First-order Logic and Automated Theorem Proving, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, Inc. (1996)
Cuenca Grau, B., Halaschek-Wiener, C., Kazakov, Y.: History matters: Incremental ontology reasoning using modules. In: Aberer, K., Choi, K.-S., Noy, N., Allemang, D., Lee, K.-I., Nixon, L.J.B., Golbeck, J., Mika, P., Maynard, D., Mizoguchi, R., Schreiber, G., Cudré-Mauroux, P. (eds.) ASWC 2007 and ISWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 183–196. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Cuenca Grau, B., Horrocks, I., Kazakov, Y., Sattler, U.: Just the right amount: Extracting modules from ontologies. In: Proc. of WWW 2007, pp. 717–726 (2007)
Cuenca Grau, B., Parsia, B., Sirin, E., Kalyanpur, A.: Modularity and web ontologies. In: Proc. of KR 2006, pp. 198–209 (2006)
Guo, Y., Pan, Z., Heflin, J.: LUBM: A benchmark for OWL knowledge base systems. Journal of Web Semantics 3(2–3), 158–182 (2005)
Hustadt, U., Motik, B., Sattler, U.: Reasoning in description logics by a reduction to disjunctive datalog. Journal of Automated Reasoning 39(3), 351–384 (2007)
Kalyanpur, A., Parsia, B., Horridge, M., Sirin, E.: Finding all justifications of OWL DL entailments. In: Aberer, K., Choi, K.-S., Noy, N., Allemang, D., Lee, K.-I., Nixon, L.J.B., Golbeck, J., Mika, P., Maynard, D., Mizoguchi, R., Schreiber, G., Cudré-Mauroux, P. (eds.) ASWC 2007 and ISWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 267–280. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Kazakov, Y., Motik, B.: A resolution-based decision procedure for \(\mathcal{SHOIQ}\). Journal of Automated Reasoning 40(2-3), 89–116 (2008)
Ma, L., Yang, Y., Qiu, Z., Xie, G., Pan, Y., Liu, S.: Towards a complete OWL ontology benchmark. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) ESWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4011, pp. 125–139. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Motik, B., Sattler, U., Studer, R.: Query answering for OWL-DL with rules. Journal of Web Semantics 3(1), 41–60 (2005)
Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: Specifying ontology views by traversal. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 713–725. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Schlobach, S., Cornet, R.: Non-standard reasoning services for the debugging of description logic terminologies. In: Proc. of IJCAI 2003, pp. 355–362 (2003)
Seidenberg, J., Rector, A.L.: Web ontology segmentation: Analysis, classification and use. In: Proc. of WWW 2006, pp. 13–22 (2006)
Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Cuenca Grau, B., Kalyanpur, A., Katz, Y.: Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner. Journal of Web Semantics 5(2), 51–53 (2007)
Stuckenschmidt, H., Klein, M.: Structure-based partitioning of large concept hierarchies. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 289–303. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Suntisrivaraporn, B.: Module extraction and incremental classification: A pragmatic approach for \(\mathcal{EL}^+\) ontologies. In: Bechhofer, S., Hauswirth, M., Hoffmann, J., Koubarakis, M. (eds.) ESWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5021, pp. 230–244. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Suntisrivaraporn, B., Qi, G., Ji, Q., Haase, P.: A modularization-based approach to finding all justifications for owl dl entailments. In: Domingue, J., Anutariya, C. (eds.) ASWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5367, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Du, J., Qi, G., Ji, Q. (2009). Goal-Directed Module Extraction for Explaining OWL DL Entailments. In: Bernstein, A., et al. The Semantic Web - ISWC 2009. ISWC 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5823. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04930-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04930-9_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04929-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04930-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)