Skip to main content

Epistemic Games in Modal Logic: Joint Actions, Knowledge and Preferences All Together

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5834))

Abstract

We propose a modal logic called \(\mathcal{EDLA}\) (Epistemic Dynamic Logic of Agency) that allows to reason about epistemic games in strategic form. \(\mathcal{EDLA}\) integrates the concepts of joint action, preference and knowledge. In the first part of the paper we introduce \(\mathcal{EDLA}\) and provide soundness, completeness and complexity results. In the second part we study in \(\mathcal{EDLA}\) the epistemic and rationality conditions of some classical solution concepts like Nash equilibrium and iterated strict dominance. In the last part of the paper we combine \(\mathcal{EDLA}\) with Dynamic Epistemic Logic (DEL) in order to model epistemic game dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aumann, R.J., Brandenburger, A.: Epistemic conditions for Nash equilibrium. Econometrica 63, 1161–1180 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Balbiani, P., Gasquet, O., Herzig, A., Schwarzentruber, F., Troquard, N.: Coalition games over Kripke semantics. In: Festschrift in Honour of Shahid Rahman, pp. 11–32. College Publications (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Battigalli, P., Bonanno, G.: Recent results on belief, knowledge and the epistemic foundations of game theory. Research in Economics 53, 149–225 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Belnap, N., Perloff, M., Xu, M.: Facing the future: agents and choices in our indeterminist world. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. van Benthem, J.: Rational dynamics and epistemic logic in games. International Game Theory Review 9(1), 13–45 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. van Benthem, J., Liu, F.: Dynamic logic of preference upgrade. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 17(2), 157–182 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonanno, G.: A syntactic approach to rationality in games with ordinal payoffs. In: Proc. of LOFT 2008, pp. 59–86 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brandenburger, A.: Knowledge and equilibrium in games. Journal of Economic Perspectives 6, 83–101 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. de Bruin, B.: Explaining games: on the logic of game theoretic explanations. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. van Ditmarsch, H.P., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2007)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Halpern, J.Y., Rego, L.: Generalized solution concepts in games with possibly unaware players. In: Proc. of TARK 2007, pp. 253–262 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harsanyi, J.: Games with incomplete informations played by ‘bayesian’ players: Part I, the basic model. Management Science 14(3), 159–182 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Herzig, A., Lorini, E.: A dynamic logic of agency I: STIT, abilities and powers. Technical Report RR2009-4FR, Institut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. van der Hoek, W., Jamroga, W., Wooldridge, M.: A logic for strategic reasoning. In: Proc. of AAMAS 2005, pp. 157–164. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Horty, J.F.: Agency and Deontic Logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Lorini, E.: A dynamic logic of agency II: deterministic DLA, coalition logic, and game theory. Technical Report RR2009-5FR, Institut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: A course in game theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Pauly, M.: A modal logic for coalitional power in games. Journal of Logic and Computation 12(1), 149–166 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Roy, O.: Thinking before acting: intentions, logic, rational choice. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Troquard, N., van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: A logic of games and propositional control. In: Proc. of AAMAS 2009, pp. 961–968. ACM Press, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lorini, E., Schwarzentruber, F., Herzig, A. (2009). Epistemic Games in Modal Logic: Joint Actions, Knowledge and Preferences All Together. In: He, X., Horty, J., Pacuit, E. (eds) Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. LORI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5834. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04893-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04893-7_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04892-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04893-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics