Skip to main content

A Guardian Agent Approach to Safety in Medical Multi-agent Systems

  • Conference paper
Safety and Security in Multiagent Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4324))

  • 491 Accesses

Abstract

We present an overview of current work on argumentation based reasoning to ensure safety in medical multi-agent systems. In particular, we describe deployment of a specialised Guardian agent engaging in argumentation based reasoning about safety, and argumentation based dialogues with other agents to cooperatively ensure that agent activities are safe. The work is being conducted as part of a project aiming at development of theoretical models of argumentation, and their implementation in software components for deployment in agent technologies. The project has established a medical multi-agent scenario requiring deployment of the Guardian agent. This scenario provides a focus both for theoretical work and the eliciting of technical requirements. In this paper we describe the scenario and discuss the theoretical issues being addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alsinet, T., Ansótegui, C., Béjar, R., Fernández, C., Manyá, F.: Automated monitoring of medical protocols: a secure and distributed architecture. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 27(3), 367–392 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amgoud, L.: A formal framework for handling conflicting desires. In: Nielsen, T.D., Zhang, N.L. (eds.) ECSQARU 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2711, pp. 552–563. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77, 321–357 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fox, J., Das, S.: Safe and Sound. Artificial Intelligence in Hazardous Applications. AAAI Press, The MIT Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hitchcock, D., McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: A framework for deliberation dialogues. In: Hansen, H.V., Tindale, C.W., Blair, J.A., Johnson, R.H. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth Biennial Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA 2001), Windsor, Ontario, Canada (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper, R.P., Yule, P., Fox, J., Glasspool, D.W.: Modelling High-Level Cognitive Processes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kakas, A., Moraitis, P.: Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents. In: Proc. Second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp. 883–890. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Krause, P., Ambler, S., Elvang-Gøransson, M., Fox, J.: A logic of argumentation for reasoning under uncertainty. Computational Intelligence 11(1), 113–131 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Georgeff, M., Pell, B., Pollack, M., Tambe, M., Wooldridge, M.: The belief-desire-intention model of agency. In: Proceedings of Agents, Theories, Architectures and Languages (ATAL)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Modgil, S.: Fractal argumentation and its application to decision making over actions. Submitted to the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2005 (July 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Modgil, S., Hammond, P.: Generating symbolic and natural language partial solutions for inclusion in medical plans. In: Quaglini, S., Barahona, P., Andreassen, S. (eds.) AIME 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2101, pp. 239–248. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Norman, T.J., Carbogim, D.V., Krabbe, E.C.W., Walton, D.: Argument and multi-agent systems. In: Reed, C., Norman, T.J. (eds.) Argumentation machines: New frontiers in argument and computation, ch. 2. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Riao, D., Moreno, A., Valls, A.: Palliasys: Agent based palliative care. In: Ghidini, C., Giorgini, P., van der Hoek, W. (eds.) IEEE 4th Conf. on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA 2004), Budapest, Hungary (2004), EUMAS

    Google Scholar 

  14. Walton, D.N., Krabbe, E.C.W.: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. SUNY Series in Logic and Language. Logic and Language. State University of New York Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Modgil, S., Fox, J. (2009). A Guardian Agent Approach to Safety in Medical Multi-agent Systems. In: Barley, M., Mouratidis, H., Unruh, A., Spears, D., Scerri, P., Massacci, F. (eds) Safety and Security in Multiagent Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4324. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04879-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04879-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04878-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04879-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics