Skip to main content

Modeling Associations through Intensional Attributes

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Modeling - ER 2009 (ER 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5829))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Attributes, a.k.a. slots or properties, are the main mechanism used to define associations between concepts or individuals modeling real world entities in a knowledge base. Traditionally, an attribute is defined by an explicit statement that specifies the name of the attribute and the entities it associates. This has three main limitations: (i) it is not easy to apply to large amounts of data, even if they share the same characteristics, since explicit definitions are needed for each concept or individual; (ii) it cannot handle future data, i.e., when new concepts or individuals are inserted in the knowledge base their attributes need to be explicitly defined; and (iii) it assumes that the data engineer, or the user that is introducing a new attribute, has access and privileges to modify the respective objects. The above may not be practical in many real ontology application scenarios. We are introducing a new form of attribute in which the domain and range are not specified explicitly but intensionally, through a query that defines the set of concepts or individuals being associated. We provide the formal semantics of this new form of attribute, describe how to overcome syntax constraints that prevent the use of the proposed attribute, study its behavior, show efficient ways of implementation, and experiment with alternative evaluation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Noy, N.F., McGuinness, D.L.: Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Technical report, Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory KSL-01-05 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. W3C: Resource description framework, RDF (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/

  3. W3C: RDF vocabulary description language 1.0: RDF Schema (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/

  4. Baader, F., Nutt, W.: Basic Description Logics. In: Description Logic Handbook, pp. 43–95 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stonebraker, M., Anton, J., Hanson, E.N.: Extending a Database System with Procedures.. TODS 12(3), 350–376 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Neven, F., Bussche, J.V., Gucht, D.V., Vossen, G.: Typed Query Languages for Databases Containing Queries. In: PODS, pp. 189–196 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lenzerini, M.: Data Integration: A Theoretical Perspective. In: PODS, pp. 233–246 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. van den Bussche, J., Vansummeren, S., Vossen, G.: Towards practical meta-querying. Inf. Syst. 30(4), 317–332 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Srivastava, D., Velegrakis, Y.: Intensional Associations between Data and Metadata. In: SIGMOD, pp. 401–412 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Borgida, A., Brachman, R.J.: Modeling with Description Logics. In: Description Logic Handbook, pp. 349–372 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. W3C: OWL web ontology language reference (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/

  12. W3C: SPARQL query language for RDF (2008), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/

  13. Gawlick, D., Lenkov, D., Yalamanchi, A., Chernobrod, L.: Applications for Expression Data in Relational Database System.. In: ICDE, pp. 609–620 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Buneman, P., Khanna, S., Tan, W.C.: On propagation of deletions and annotations through views. In: PODS, pp. 150–158. ACM, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Geerts, F., Kementsietsidis, A., Milano, D.: MONDRIAN: Annotating and querying databases through colors and blocks. In: ICDE, p. 82 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bertino, E., Castano, S., Ferrari, E.: On specifying security policies for web documents with an XML-based language. In: SACMAT, pp. 57–65 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. W3C: Semantic web (2008), http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Presa, A., Velegrakis, Y., Rizzolo, F., Bykau, S. (2009). Modeling Associations through Intensional Attributes. In: Laender, A.H.F., Castano, S., Dayal, U., Casati, F., de Oliveira, J.P.M. (eds) Conceptual Modeling - ER 2009. ER 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5829. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04840-1_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04840-1_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04839-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04840-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics