Advertisement

Modeling Ambiguity Averse Behavior of Individual Decision Making: Prospect Theory under Uncertainty

  • Hiroyuki Tamura
Conference paper
  • 706 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5861)

Abstract

Firstly, a behavioral model based on the "Prospect Theory" developed by Kahneman and Tversky is described. In this model weighting function of non-additive probabilities are introduced where probability of each event occurring is known. The effective application of this approach to the public sector is shown in modeling risks of extreme events with low probability and high outcome. Next, a behavioral model based on our "Prospect Theory under Uncertainty" is described where basic probability of a set of events is known but occurrence probability of each event is not known. It is shown that this model could properly explain the Ellsberg paradox of ambiguity aversion. Potential applicability of this approach to assessing global environmental-economic policies is described.

Keywords

Individual decision making Behavioral (descriptive) model Utility theory Expected utility paradox Prospect theory under uncertainty 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kahneman, D.: Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review 93, 1449–1475 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allais, M., Hagen, O. (eds.): Expected Utility Hypothesis and the Allais Paradox. D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1979)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ellsberg, D.: Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms. Quart. J. Econnomics 75, 643–669 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, 263–291 (1979)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tamura, H.: Behavioral models of decision making under risk and/or uncertainty with application to public sectors. Annual Reviews in Control 32, 99–106 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hammond, P.J.: Objective expected utility: A consequentialist perspective. In: Barbera, S., Hammond, P.J., Seidl, C. (eds.) Handbook of Utility Theory Principles, vol. 1, pp. 143–211. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1947)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tamura, H.: Behavioral models for complex decision analysis. European J. Operational Research 166, 655–665 (2005)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kranz, D.H., Luce, R.D., Suppes, P.: Foundations of Measurement. Academic Press, New York (1971)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dyer, J.S., Sarin, R.K.: Measurable multi-attribute value function. Operations Research 27, 810–822 (1979)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tamura, H., Yamamoto, K., Tomiyama, S., Hatono, I.: Modeling and analysis of decision making problem for mitigating natural disaster risks. European J. Operational Research 122, 461–468 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tamura, H., Miura, Y., Inuiguchi, M.: Value Judgment for the Sense of Security Based on Utility Theoretic Approaches. International Journal of Knowledge and System Sciences 2(2), 33–38 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shafer, G. (ed.): A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton (1976)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jaffray, J.: Application of linear utility theory to belief functions. In: Proc. 2nd International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, pp. 1–8 (1988)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tamura, H., Miura, Y.: Value judgment of the sense of security for nursing care robots based on the prospect theory under uncertainty. International J. Knowledge and System Sciences 3, 28–33 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tamura, H., Teraoka, R.: Prospect theory under uncertainty with application to assessing global environmental-economic policies, SRA Annual Meeting, Boston, T3-I.3 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    UNFCCC. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Database, GHG (2003), http://ghg.unfccc.int/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroyuki Tamura
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering ScienceKansai UniversityOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations