Advertisement

A Consensus Reaching Model for Web 2.0 Communities

  • Sergio Alonso
  • Ignacio J. Pérez
  • Francisco J. Cabrerizo
  • Enrique Herrera-Viedma
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5861)

Abstract

Web 2.0 Communities allow large amounts of users to interact with each others. In fact, new Web 2.0 technologies allow to share resources and information in an easy and timely manner, allowing real time communication among persons all over the world. However, as Web 2.0 Communities are a quite recent phenomenon with its own characteristics and particularities, there is still a necessity of developing new tools that allow to reach decisions with a high enough consensus level among their users. In this contribution we present a new consensus reaching model designed to incorporate the benefits that a Web 2.0 Community offers (rich and diverse knowledge due to a large number of users, real-time communication...) and that tries to minimize the main problems that this kind of organization presents (low and intermittent participation rates, difficulty of establishing trust relations and so on).

Keywords

Consensus Model Consensus Process Trust Network Fuzzy Preference Relation Linguistic Preference Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lin, K.: E-commerce technology: Back to a prominent future. IEEE Internet Computing 12, 60–65 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Porcel, C., López-Herrera, A., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A recommender system for research resources based on fuzzy linguistic modeling. Expert Systems with Applications 36, 5173–5183 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Fodor, J., Roubens, M.: Fuzzy preference modelling and multicriteria decision support. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1994)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M.: Multiperson decision making models using fuzzy sets and possibility theory. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1990)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 115, 67–82 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F.: A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part A: Systems and Man 32(3), 394–402 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mata, F., Martínez, L., Herrera-Viedma, E.: An adaptive consensus support model for group decision making problems in a multi-granular fuzzy linguistic context. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 17(2), 279–290 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Herrera-Viedma, E., Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., Alonso, S.: Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B, Cybernetics 37(1), 176–189 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Herrera-Viedma, E., Alonso, S., Chiclana, F., Herrera, F.: A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 15(5), 863–877 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cabrerizo, F., Moreno, J., Pérez, I., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacks. Soft Computing (In press, 2009), doi:10.1007/s00500-009-0453-xGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cabrerizo, F., Alonso, S., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A consensus model for group decision making problems with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 8(1), 109–131 (2009)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xu, Z.: Dynamic linguistic preference relations and their use in multi-period decision making. In: International Conference on Management Science and Engineering, Harbin, P.R. China, pp. 345–350 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dia, H.: An agent-based approach to modelling driver route choice bahaviour under the influence of real-time information. Transportation Research Part C 10, 331–349 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Clarke, H.: Classical decision rules and adaptation to climate change. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 52, 487–504 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saaty, T.: Time dependent decision-making; dynamic priorities in the AHP/ANP: Generalizinf from points to functions and fro mreal to complex variables. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 46, 860–891 (2007)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ballester, M., García-Lapresta, J.: Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 16(2), 57–68 (2008)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baym, N.K.: The Emergence of On-line Community. In: Cybersociety 2.0., pp. 35–68. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1998)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ling, K., Beenen, G., Ludford, P., Wang, X., Chang, K., Li, X., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Terveen, L., Rashid, A.M., Resnick, P., Kraut, R.: Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10(4) (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Victor, P., Cornelis, C., Cock, M.D., da Silva, P.: Gradual trust and distrust in recommender systems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 160(10), 1367–1382 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sergio Alonso
    • 1
  • Ignacio J. Pérez
    • 2
  • Francisco J. Cabrerizo
    • 3
  • Enrique Herrera-Viedma
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of Software EngineeringUniversity of GranadaSpain
  2. 2.Dept. of Computer Science and Artificial IntelligenceUniversity of GranadaSpain
  3. 3.Dept. of Software Engineering and Computer SystemsDistance Learning University of Spain (UNED)MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations