e-Government: Challenges and Lost Opportunities

  • Jaroslav Král
  • Michal Žemlička
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5736)


The e-government systems are the largest software systems ever used. They influence almost all aspects of the life of a society. The analysis of the capabilities they provide indicates that e-government does not provide enough tools for the strategic aspects of the development of states and societies. Examples include control and optimization of education system, crisis prediction and control, and analysis of administrative processes. It is amplified by the delayed application of modern software architectures and e-government. We show that the precondition of any solution of these issues is a proper treatment of data collection and a reasonable data security policy in e-government systems. It should lead to an architecture of e-government having three well-developed virtual tiers: user, application, and data tier. Current systems have almost no data tier. The condition for it is an explicit formulation of measurable aims regarding strategic aspects of the use of e-government systems.


Data Security Composite Service Enterprise Resource Planning Enterprise Resource Planning System Social Software 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Mintzberg, H.: Mintzberg on Management. Free Press, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Manpower: Talent shortage survey: 2007 global results (2008),
  3. 3.
    Král, J., Žemlička, M.: Pragmatic web-based service-oriented systems. In: ICWS 2009 (submitted, 2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Organization for Standardization: ISO 9000:2005 Quality management systems – fundamentals and vocabulary (2005),
  5. 5.
    Spellings, M.: Answering the Challenge of a Changing World. U.S. Department of Education (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fortenberry, N.L., Sullivan, J.F., Jordan, P.N., Knight, D.W.: Engineering education research aids instruction. Science 317, 1175–1176 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mervis, J.: Congress pases massive measure to support reearch and education. Science 317, 736–737 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mervis, J.: A new bottom line for school science. Science 319, 1030–1033 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mervis, J.: U.S. says no to next global test of advanced math, scicence students. Science 317, 1851 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jamieson, L.: Engineering education in a changing world. The Bridge (Spring 2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    OGC – the Office of Government Commerce (UK): IT infrastructure library (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Král, J., Žemlička, M.: Software architecture for evolving environment. In: Kontogiannis, K., Zou, Y., Penta, M.D. (eds.) Software Technology and Engineering Practice, pp. 49–58. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moreno-Moreno, P., Yáñez-Márquez, C.: The new informatics technologies in education debate. In: Lytras, M.D., et al. (eds.) WSKS 2008. CCIS, vol. 19, pp. 291–296. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Korres, G.M., Tsamadias, C.: Looking at the knowledge economy: Some issues on theory and evidence. In: Lytras, M.D., et al. (eds.) WSKS 2008. CCIS, vol. 19, pp. 712–719. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Diamond, J.M.: Collapse: How Societies Chooses to Fail or Succeed. Viking, New York (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaroslav Král
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michal Žemlička
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Mathematics and PhysicsCharles UniversityPraha 1Czech Republic
  2. 2.Faculty of InformaticsMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations