Advertisement

Taking Up the Challenge of Evaluating Research Results in the Field of Technology Enhanced Learning

  • Rosa Maria Bottino
  • Michela Ott
  • Francesca Pozzi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5736)

Abstract

The present contribution tackles the issue of the evaluation of research results in the field of Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL). It presents an evaluation model designed to evaluate a web based Pedagogical Planner and the theoretical model underpinning it. The evaluation model, designed and tested within a European project, proved to be able to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the TEL system at hand, by distinguishing between theory and practice, between the advantages and disadvantages derived from the theoretical model and/or those referable to the implemented tool.

Keywords

Research Evaluation Technology Enhanced Learning Educational Innovation Pedagogical Planning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Latchem, C. (ed.): A content analysis of the British Journal of Educational Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology 37(4), 503–511 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jacobs, G.: Evaluating courseware: Some critical questions. Innovations in Education and Training International 35, 3–8 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crowther, M.S., Keller, C.C., Waddoups Gregory, L.: Improving the quality and effectiveness of computer-mediated instruction through usability evaluations. British Journal of Educational Technology 35(3), 289–303 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bligh, B.: Towards a compendium of learning space evaluations, http://www.lsri.nottingham.ac.uk/JELS/JELS_newsletter1_Dec08.pdf (accessed December 08, 2008)
  5. 5.
    Alexandropoulou, D.A., Angelis, V.A., Mavri, M.: Knowledge management and higher education: present state and future trends. Int. Journal of Knowledge and Learning 5(1), 96–106 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim, S., Brock, D.M., Orkand, A., Astion, M.L.: Design implications from a usability study of GramStain-TutorTM. British Journal of Educational Technology 32(5), 595–605 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hlapanis, G., Dimitrakopoulou, A.: A course model implemented in a teacher’s learning community context: issues of course assessment. Behaviour & Information Technology 26(6), 561–578 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bottino, R.M., Earp, J., Olimpo, G., Ott, M., Pozzi, F., Tavella, M.: Supporting the Design of Pilot Learning Activities with the Pedagogical Plan Manager. In: Learning to live in the knowledge society. IFIP – International Federation for Information Processing - Book Series, pp. 37–44. Springer, Boston (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Artigue, M.: Digital technologies: A window on theoretical issues in Mathematics education. In: Pitta-Pantazi, D., Philippou, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the V Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education CERME, vol. 5, pp. 68–82 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bottino, R.M., Artigue, M., Noss, R.: Building European Collaboration in Technology-Enhanced Learning in Mathematics. In: Balacheff, N., et al. (eds.) Technology Enhanced Learning, pp. 73–87. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bottino, R.M., Earp, J., Olimpo, G., Ott, M., Pozzi, F., Tavella, M.: Pedagogical Plans as Communication Oriented objects. Poster presented at Cal 2009 Conference, Brighton, March 23-24 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Turner, L.A.: Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1, 112–133 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bagozzi, R.P., Davis, F.D., Warshaw, P.R.: Development and test of a theory of technology learning and usage. Human Relations 45(7), 660–686 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sammour, G., Schreurs, J., Al-Zoubi, A.Y., Vanhoof, K.: The role of knowledge management and e-learning in professional development. Int. Journal of Knowledge and Learning 4(5), 465–477 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosa Maria Bottino
    • 1
  • Michela Ott
    • 1
  • Francesca Pozzi
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto Tecnologie Didattiche – CNRGenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations