Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bibliography

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
OntoCAPE

Part of the book series: RWTHedition ((RWTH))

  • 712 Accesses

Abstract

Abecker A, Bernardi A, Hinkelmann K, Kühn O, Sintek M (1998) Toward a technology for organizational memories. IEEE Intell. Syst. 13 (3):40–48.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abecker A, Bernardi A, Hinkelmann K, Kühn O, Sintek M (1998) Toward a technology for organizational memories. IEEE Intell. Syst. 13 (3):40–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff RL (1989) From data to wisdom. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 16:3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitken S (1998) Extending the HPKB-upper-level ontology: experiences and observations. In: Proceedings of the ECAI-98 Workshop on Applications of Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods:11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberts LK (1994) YMIR: a sharable ontology for the formal representation of engineering design knowledge. In: Gero JS, Tyugu E (eds.): Formal Design Methods for CAD. Elsevier, New York:3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin MA, Morbach J (2007) XML to OWL Converter. Technical Report (LPT-2007-02), Lehrstuhl für Prozesstechnik, RWTH Aachen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin MA, Morbach J (2008) DAML+OIL to OWL converter. Online available at http://www.avt.rwth-aachen.de/AVT/index.php?id=523. Accessed January 2008.

  • Andresen T (1999) The macroeconomy as a network of money-flow transfer functions. Model. Ident. Contr. 19 (4):207–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anhäuser F, Richert H, Temmen H (2004) Degussa PlantXML – integrierter Planungsprozess mit flexiblen Bausteinen. Autom. Tech. Prax. 46 (10):61 – 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arpírez JC, Gómez-Pérez A, Lozano A, Pinto HS (1998) (ONTO)2Agent: an ontology – based WWW broker to select ontologies. In: Proceedings of the ECAI-98 Workshop on Applications of Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods:16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • AspenTech (2008) Aspen Plus. Online available at http://www.aspentech.com/products/aspen-plus.cfm. Accessed June 2008.

  • Atkinson C, Kühne T (2002) The role of metamodeling in MDA. In: Proceedings of the Workshop in Software Model Engineering (in conjunction with UML’02, Dresden, Germany). Online available at http://www.metamodel.com/wisme-2002/papers/atkinson.pdf. Accessed January 2008.

  • AVEVA (2008). AVEVA NET – website. Online available at http://www.aveva.com/products_services_aveva_net.php. Accessed June 2008.

  • Awad EM, Ghaziri HM (2003) Knowledge Management. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baader F, Calvanese D, McGuinness DL, Nardi D, Patel-Schneider PF (2003) The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bañares-Alcántara R, Lababidi HMS (1995) Design support systems for process engineering. – II. KBDS: An experimental prototype. Comput. Chem. Eng. 19:279–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bañares-Alcántara R, Kokossis A, Aldea A, Jiménez L, Linke P (2003) A knowledge management platform to extract and process information from the Web, In: Chen B, Westerberg AW (eds.): Process Systems Engineering 2003. Elsevier:1262–1267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard JBL, Rhee SY (2004) Ontologies in biology: design, applications and future challenges. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5:213–222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barkmeyer EJ, Feeney AB, Denno P, Flater DW, Libes DE, Steves MP, Wallace EK (2003) Concepts for Automating Systems Integration. Technical Report (NISTIR 6928), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batres R, Naka Y (2000) Process plant ontologies based on a multi-dimensional framework. In: Malone MF, Trainham JA, Carnahan B (eds.): Fifth International Conference on Foundations of Computer-Aided Process Design. AIChE:433–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batres R, Naka Y, Lu ML (1999) A multidimensional design framework and its implementation in an engineering design environment. Concur. Eng. 7 (1):43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batres R, Aoyama A, Naka Y (2002) A life-cycle approach for model reuse and exchange. Comput. Chem. Eng. 26 (4/5):487–498.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Batres R, West M, Leal D, Price D, Masaki K, Shimada Y, Fuchino T, Naka Y (2007) An upper ontology based on ISO 15926. Comput. Chem. Eng. 31 (5/6):519–534.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister M (2000) Ein Objektmodell zur Repräasentation und Wiederverwendung verfahrenstechnischer Prozeßmodelle. PhD thesis (LPT-diss-2000-12), Lehrstuhl für Prozesstechnik, RWTH Aachen University. Online available at http://www.avt.rwth-aachen.de/AVT/index.php?id=541&L=0&Nummer=LPT-diss-2000-02.

  • Baumeister M, Marquardt W (1998) The chemical engineering data model VeDa, part 1: VDDL – The Language Definition. Technical Report (LPT-1998-01), Lehrstuhl für Prozesstechnik, RWTH Aachen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter JE, Juster NP, de Pennington A (1994) A functional data model for assemblies used to verify product design specifications. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 208 (B4):235-244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer B (2003) Conceptual Information Modeling for Computer Aided Support of Chemical Process Design. Fortschritt-Berichte VDI: Reihe 3, Nr. 787. VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer B, Marquardt W (2003) A Comparison of Data Models in Chemical Engineering. Concur. Eng. 11 (2):129-138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer B, Marquardt W (2004) Towards integrated information models for data and documents. Comput. Chem. Eng. 28 (8):1249–1266.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer B, Marquardt W (2009) A Conceptual Information Model for the Chemical Process Design Lifecycle. In : Jarke M, Jeusfeld M, Mylopoulos J (eds.): Meta Modeling and Method Engineering, MIT:357-381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer B, Krobb C, Marquardt W (2001) A Data Model for Design Data in Chemical Engineering – Information Models. Technical Report LPT–2001–15. Lehrstuhl für Prozesstechnik, RWTH Aachen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer B, Schneider R, Marquardt W (2000) Integration of data models for process design – First steps and experiences. Comput. Chem. Eng. 24, 599-605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bechhofer S, Horrocks I, Goble C, Stevens R (2001) OilEd: a reasonable ontology editor for the semantic web. In: Baader F, Brewka G, Eiter T (eds.): KI 2001: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Berlin:396–408.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bechhofer S, van Harmelen F, Hendler J, Horrocks I, McGuinness D, Patel-Schneider L, Stein LA (2004) OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004. Online available at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/. Accessed September 2007.

  • Becker S, Nagl M, Westfechtel B (2008a) Incremental and interactive integrator tools for design product consistency. In: Nagl M, Marquardt W (eds.): Collaborative and Distributed Chemical Engineering. Springer, Berlin:224–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker S, Marquardt W, Morbach J, Nagl M (2008b) Model dependencies, fine-grained relations, and integrator tools. In: Nagl M, Marquardt W (eds.): Collaborative and Distributed Chemical Engineering. Springer, Berlin:612–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernaras A, Laresgoiti I, Corera J (1996) Building and reusing ontologies for electrical network applications. In: Wahlster W (ed.): ECAI 1996 – Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. John Wiley, New York:298–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy L (1968) General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. Braziller, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieszczad J (2000) A Framework for the Language and Logic of Computer-Aided Phenomena-Based Process Modeling. PhD Thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biegler LT, Grossmann IE, Westerberg AW (1997) Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgic T, Rock D (1997) Product data management systems: State-of-the-art and the future. In: Proceedings of the 1997 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Sacramento, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIPM (2006) The International System of Units (SI), 8 th edition. SI brochure, published by the International Committee for Weights and Measures (Bureau International des Poids et Measures, BIPM). Online available at http://www.bipm.fr/en/si/si_brochure/. Accessed September 2007.

  • BIPM (2007) BIPM: Bureau International des Poids et Mesures. Website, available at www.bipm.org. Accessed October 2007.

  • Bird RB, Stewart WE, Lightfoot EN (2001) Transport Phenomena. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biron PV, Permanente K, Malhotra A (2004) XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Second Edition. W3C Recommendation. Online available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/. Accessed January 2007.

  • Black PE, ed. (2004) Data structure. In: Dictionary of Algorithms and Data Structures. U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Online available at http://www.itl.nist.gov/div897/sqg/dads/. Accessed January 2009.

  • Blitz D (1992) Emergent Evolution, Qualitative Novelty and the Kinds of Reality. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenreider O (2001) Medical Ontology Research. Technical Report, Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, U.S. National Library of Medicine. Online available at http://mor.nlm.nih.gov:8000/pubs/pdf/2001-MOR-BoSC.pdf. Accessed February 2008.

  • Bogusch R (2001) A Software Environment for Computer-Aided Modeling of Chemical Processes. Fortschritt-Berichte VDI: Reihe 3, Nr. 705, VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogusch R, Marquardt W (1998) The Chemical Engineering Data Model VeDa. Part 4: Behavioral Modeling Objects. Technical Report (LPT-1998-04), Lehrstuhl für Prozesstechnik, RWTH Aachen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogusch R, Lohmann B, Marquardt W (2001) Computer-aided process modeling with ModKit. Comput. Chem. Eng. 25 (7/8):963–995.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borst P, Akkermans JM, Top JL (1997) Engineering ontologies. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 46:365–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borst P, Akkermans JM, Pos A, Top JL (1995) The PhySys ontology for physical systems. In: Bredeweg (ed.): Proceedings of the 9 th International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning. University of Amsterdam:11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borst WN (1997) Construction of Engineering Ontologies for Knowledge Sharing and Reuse. PhD Thesis, Centre for Telematics and Information Technology, University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt SC, Schlüter M, Jarke M (2006) A process data warehouse for tracing and reuse of engineering design processes. Int. J. Intell. Inf. Technol. 2 (4):18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt SC, Fritzen O, Jarke M, List T (2008a) Goal-oriented information flow management in development processes. In: Nagl M, Marquardt W (eds.): Collaborative and Distributed Chemical Engineering. Springer, Berlin:369–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt SC, Morbach J, Miatidis M, Theißen M, Jarke M, Marquardt W (2008b) An ontology-based approach to knowledge management in design processes. Comput. Chem. Eng. 32:320–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunschweig B, Gani R, eds. (2002) Software Architecture and Tools for Computer Aided Process Engineering. Elsevier Science B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunschweig B, Fraga ES, Guessoum Z, Paen D, Piñol D, Yang A (2002) CO-Gents: cognitive middleware agents to support e-CAPE. In: Stanford-Smith B, Chiozza E, Edin M (eds.): Challenges and Achievements in E–business and E–work. IOS Press:1182–1189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunschweig B, Fraga ES, Guessoum Z, Marquardt W, Nadjemi O, Paen D, Piñol D, Roux P, Sama S, Serra M, Stalker I, Yang A (2004) CAPE web services: the COGents way. In: Barbarosa-Póvoa, A., Matos, H (eds.): European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering -14. Elsevier, Amsterdam:1021–1026.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray T, Hollander D, Layman A, Tobin R, eds. (2006a) Namespaces in XML 1.0 (Second Edition). W3C Recommendation, 16 August 2006. Online available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names. Accessed September 2008.

  • Bray T, Paoli J, Sperberg-McQueen CM, Maler E, Yergeau F, eds. (2006b). Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Forth Edition). W3C Recommendation, 16 August 2006. Online available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/. Accessed September 2008.

  • Brickley D, Guha RV, eds. (2004). RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004. Online available at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/. Accessed September 2008.

  • Britt H, Chen C, Mahalec V, McBrien A (2004) Modeling and simulation in 2004: an industrial perspective. In: Proceedings of the 6 th International Conference on Foundations of Computer Aided Process Design, CACHE Publications, 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge M (1979) Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Volume 4. Ontology II: A World of Systems. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bylander T, Chandrasekaran B (1988) Generic tasks in knowledge-based reasoning: the right level of abstraction for knowledge acquisition. In: Gaines B, Boose J (eds.): Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems. Academic Press, London:65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron I, Hangos K, Stephanopolous G, Perkins J (2001) Process Modeling and Model Analysis. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle D, Ion P, Miner R, Poppelier N, eds. (2003) Mathematical Markup Language (MathML) Version 2.0 (Second Edition). W3C Recommendation, online available at http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/. Accessed September 2007.

  • CAS (2007) CAS Registry Overview. Website, online available at http://www.cas.org/EO/regsys.html. Accessed February 2007.

  • Casati R, Varzi A (1999) Parts and Places: The Structures of Spatial Representation. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cellier FE, Kofman E (2006) Continuous System Simulation. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran B (1994) Functional representation and causal processes. In: Yovits MC (ed.): Advances in Computers. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran B, Johnson TR (1993) Generic tasks and task structures: history, critique and new directions. In: David JM, Krivine JP, Simmons R (eds.): Second Generation Expert Systems. Springer, New York:232–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran B, Josephson JR (2000) Function in device representation. J. Eng. Comput. 16 (3/4):162-177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran B, Josephson JR, Benjamins VR (1999) What are ontologies, and why do we need them? IEEE Intell. Syst. 14 (1):20–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen PP (1976) The entity-relationship model – toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 1 (1):9–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chertov AG (1997) Units of physical measure. In: Grigoriev IS, Meilikhov EZ (eds.): Handbook of Physical Quantities, CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark J, ed. (1999) XSL Transformations (XSLT), Version 1.0. W3C Recommendation, 16 November 1999. Online available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt. Accessed May 2008

  • Clark P, Thompson J, Porter B (2000) Knowledge patterns. In: Cohn A, Giunchiglia F, Selman B (eds.): KR-2000: Proceedings of the Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann:591–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WW, Borgida A, Hirsh H (1992) Computing least common subsumers in description logics. In: Swartout W (ed.): Proceedings of the 10th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press:754–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly D, van Harmelen F, Horrocks I, McGuinness DL, Patel-Schneider PF, Stein LA (2001) DAML+OIL reference description. W3C Note, 18 December 2001. Online available at http://www.w3.org/TR/daml+oilreference. Accessed January 2008.

  • Crubézy M, O’Connor M, Buckeridge DL, Pincus Z, Musen MA (2005) Ontology-centered syndromic surveillance for bioterrorism. IEEE Intell. Syst. 20 (5):26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daintith J (2005) Oxford Dictionary of Physics. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (1993) Process Innovation. Harvard Business School, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis R, Shrobe H, Szolovits P (1993) What is a knowledge representation? AI Mag. 14 (1):17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dassault Systemes (2008) Industry PLM Solutions. Online available at http://www.3ds.com/solutions/. Accessed December 2008.

  • De Giacomo G, Franconi E, Cuenca Grau B, Haarslev V, Kaplunova A, Kaya A, Lembo D, Lutz C, Milicic M, Möller R, Sattler U, Sertkaya B, Suntisrivaraporn B, Turhan AY, Wandelt S, Wessel M (2007) Analysis of Test-Results on Individual Test Ontologies. TONES project deliverable (TONES-D23). Online available at http://www.tones-project.org. Accessed June 2008.

  • Dietz A (1995) Yet another representation of molecular structure? J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 35 (5):787-802.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doerr M, Hunter J, Lagoze C (2003) Towards a core ontology for information integration. J. Digit. Inf. 4 (1), Article No. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas JM (1988) Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewitz W, Szczepanski R, Pinõl D, Banks P, Halloran M, van Baten J, Pons M, eds. (2006) Thermodynamic and physical properties, version 1.1. CAPE-OPEN Interface Standards Specification. Online available at http://www.colan.org/index.html. Accessed March 2007.

  • EBI – European Bioinformatics Institute (2008) Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI). Online available at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/chebi/. Accessed June 2008.

  • EClass (2009) eCl@ss. Online available at: http://www.eclass.de.

  • Eclipse (2009) Eclipse download. Online available at http://www.eclipse.org/ Accessed April 2009.

  • Eggersmann M, Hackenberg J, Marquardt W, Cameron I (2002) Applications of modeling: A case study from process design. In: Braunschweig B, Gani R (eds.): Software Architecture and Tools for Computer Aided Process Engineering. Elsevier Science:335–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggersmann M, Bayer B, Jarke M, Marquardt W, Schneider R (2003a) Prozessund Produktmodelle für die Verfahrenstechnik. In: Westfechtel B, Nagl M (eds.): Modelle, Werkzeuge und Infrastrukturen zur Unterstützung von Entwicklungsprozessen. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim:75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggersmann M, Gonnet S, Henning GP, Krobb C, Leone HP, Marquardt W (2003b): Modeling and understanding different types of process design activities. Latin Am. Appl. Res. 33:167-175

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggersmann M, Hai R, Kausch B, Luczak H, Marquardt W, Schlick C, Schneider N, Schneider R, Theißen M (2008) Work process models. In: Nagl M, Marquardt W (eds.): Collaborative and Distributed Chemical Engineering. Springer, Berlin:126–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • EMC2 (2008) Documentum Family. Online available at http://software.emc.com/products/product_family/documentum_family.htm. Accessed May 2008.

  • Encyclopedia Britannica (2009) Unit process. Online available at: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/615307/unit-process.

  • Fedai M, Drath R (2004) CAEX – ein neutrales Datenaustauschformat für Anlagendaten – Teil 1. Autom. Tech. Prax. 46 (2):52–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensel D, Schönegge A, Groenboom R, Wielinga BJ (1996) Specification and verification of knowledge-based systems. In: Gaines BR, Musen MA (eds.): Proceedings of the 10th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop. SRDG Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferstl OK, Sinz EJ (2001) Grundlagen der Wirtschaftsinformatik, Bd. 1. Oldenbourg, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Föllinger O (1982) Einführung in die Zustandsbeschreibung dynamischer Systeme. Oldenbourg, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Föllinger O (1992) Regelungstechnik – Einführung in die Methoden und ihre Anwendung. Hüthig, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler M (1997) UML Distilled – Applying the Standard Object Modeling Language. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox MS, Grüninger M (1998) Enterprise modeling. AI Mag. 19 (3):109–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridman-Noy N, Hafner CD (1997) The state of the art in ontology design – a survey and comparative review. AI Mag. 18 (3):53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froment GF, Bischoff KB (1990) Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Früh KF (ed.) (2000) Handbuch der Prozessautomatisierung. Oldenbourg, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchino T, Takamura T, Batres R (2005) Development of engineering ontology on the basis of IDEF0 activity model. In: Khosla R, Howlett RJ, Jain LC (eds.): Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, 9th International Conference (KES 2005). Springer, Berlin:162–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallaher MP, O’Connor AC, Dettbarn Jr JL, Gilday LT (2004) Cost Analysis of Inadequate Interoperability in the U.S. Capital Facilities Industry. Technical Report (NIST GCR 04-867), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamma E, Helm R, Johnson R, Vlissides J (1995) Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao JX, Aziz H, Maropoulos PG, Cheung WM (2003) Application of product data management technologies for enterprise integration. Int. J. Computer Integr. Manuf. 16 (7-8):491–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gear CW, Petzold L (1984) ODE methods for the solution of differential/algebraic systems. Trans. Society Computer Simulation 1:27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genesereth MR, Fikes RE et al. (1992) Knowledge Interchange Format, Version 3.0 Reference Manual. Technical Report (Logic-92-1), Stanford University Logic Group. Online available at http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/genesereth92knowledge.html. Accessed October 2007.

  • Gensym (2008) Business Rule Management, Business Rules, BPM Software. Online available at http://www.gensym.com/. Accessed March 2008.

  • GeoNames (2007) GeoNames Ontology. Online available at http://www.geonames.org/ontology/. Accessed October 2007.

  • Gigch JP (1991) System Design Modeling and Metamodeling. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilles ED (1998) Network theory for chemical processes. Chem. Eng. Technol. 21 (8):121–132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GNU (2006) CVS – Open Source Version Control. Online available at http://www.nongnu.org/cvs/. Accessed October 2007.

  • GNU Project (2007) The GNU General Public Licence. Online available at http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html. Accessed December 2007.

  • GO Consortium (2007) An Introduction to the Gene Ontology. Online available at http://www.geneontology.org/GO.doc.shtml. Accessed October 2007.

  • Gold V, Loening KL, McNaught AD, Sehmi P (1987) Compendium of Chemical Terminology. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Pérez A, Fernández-López M, Corcho O (2004) Ontological Engineering. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graßmuck J, Houben KW, Zollinger RM (1994) DIN-Normen in der Verfahrenstechnik. Teubner, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green DW, Perry RH (deceased) (1997) Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook. 7th Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber TR (1993) A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowl. Acquis. 5 (2):199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber TR (1995) Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 43 (5/6):907–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber TR, Olsen GR (1994) An Ontology for Engineering Mathematics. In: Doyle J, Torasso P, Sandewall E (eds.): Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann. Online available at http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/knowledge-sharing/papers/engmath.html. Accessed September 2007.

  • Grüninger M, Fox MS (1995) Methodology for the design and evaluation of ontologies. In: Skuce D (ed.): Proceedings of the IJCAI’95 Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino N (1997a) Understanding, building, and using ontologies: A commentary to “Using Explicit Ontologies in KBS Development”, by van Heijst, Schreiber, and Wielinga. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 46 (2/3):293–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino N (1997b) Semantic matching: formal ontological distinctions for information organization, extraction, and integration. In: Pazienza MT (ed.): Information Extraction: A Multidisciplinary Approach to an Emerging Information Technology. Springer, Berlin:139–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino N (1998) Formal ontology and information systems. In: Guarino N (ed.): Formal Ontology in Information Systems. IOS Press, Amsterdam:3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino N, Boldrin L (1993) Ontological requirements for knowledge sharing. In: Skuce D (ed.): Proceedings of the IJCAI’95 Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino N, Giaretta P (1995) Ontologies and knowledge bases: towards a terminological clarification. In: Mars N (ed.): Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases: Knowledge Building and Knowledge Sharing. IOS Press, Amsterdam: 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie K (1969) Data and techniques for preliminary capital cost estimation, Chem. Eng. (New York) 24 (3):114-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutsche B (1986) Phase equilibria in oleochemical industry – application of continuous thermodynamics. Fluid Phase Equilib. 30:65-70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haarslev V, Möller R, van der Straeten R, Wessel M (2004) Extended query facilities for racer and an application to software-engineering problems. In: Proceedings of the 2004 International Workshop on Description Logics (DL-2004):148–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haase R (1990) Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, Dover Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackenberg J (2006) Computer Support for Theory-Based Modeling of Process Systems. Fortschritt-Berichte VDI, Reihe 3, Nr. 860, VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hai R, Theiβen M, Marquardt W (2009) An integrated ontology for operational processes. In: Jezowski J, Thullie J (eds.): Proceedings of the 19th European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process Engineering. Elsevier: 1087–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hairer E, Wanner G (1996) Solving Ordinary Differential Equations II – Stiff and Differential-Algebraic Problems, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halevy AY (2001) Answering queries using views: a survey. VLDB J. 10 (4):270–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M, Champy J A (1993) Reengineering the Corporation: a Manifesto for Business Revolution. HarperCollins, NewYork.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariu OH, Sage RC (1969) Crude split figured by computer. Hydrocarbon Process., Int. Ed. 48 (4):143-148.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley K (2004) Temporal Parts. In: Zalta EN (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2004 Edition). Online available at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2004/entries/temporal-parts/. Accessed October 2007.

  • Heflin J, Hendler J (2000) Dynamic ontologies on the web. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2000). AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA:443–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendler J (2007) Where are all the intelligent agents? IEEE Intell. Syst. 22 (3):2-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges W (1983) Elementary predicate logic. In: Gabbay DM, Guenthner F (eds.): Handbook of Philosophical Logic – Vol. I: Elements of Classical Logic. Reidel, Dordrecht:1–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra R, Breuker J, Di Bello M, Boer A (2007) The LKIF core ontology of basic legal concepts. In: Casanovas P, Biasiotti MA, Francesconi E, Sagri MT (eds.): Proceedings of the 2 nd Workshop on Legal Ontologies and Artificial Intelligence Techniques. CEUR Workshop Proceedings:43-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofweber T (2005) Logic and ontology. In: Zalta EN (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2005 Edition). Online available at http://plato.stanford.edu/achives/win2005/entries/logic-ontology/. Accessed January 2007.

  • Horrocks I (1998) Using an expressive description logic: FaCT or fiction? In: Cohn AG, Schubert L, Shapiro SC (eds.): Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference (KR’98). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco:636–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horrocks I, Patel-Schneider P (2004) Reducing OWL entailment to description logic satisfiability. J. Web Sem. 1 (5):345–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horrocks I, Patel-Schneider P, Boley H, Tabet S, Grosof B, Dean M (2004) SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML. W3C Member Submission 21 May 2004. Online available at http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/. Accessed December 2007.

  • Hubert H, van Houten F, eds. (1999) Integration of Process Knowledge into Design Support Systems. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • HP Labs (2007) HP Labs Semantic Web Research. Available at www.hpl.hp.com/semweb/. Accessed January 2008.

  • IEEE (1990) IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology. IEEE Standard 610.12-1990, Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineering, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEEE (2000) IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description for Software-Intensive Systems. IEEE Standard 1471-2000, Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineering, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai M (1997) Gemba Kaizen: A Commonsense, Low-Cost Approach to Management. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Incropera FP, De Witt DP (1990) Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer (3rd ed.). John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innotec (2008) Innotec – Product Over-view. Online available at http://www.innotec.com/produktuebersicht.html?&L=1. Accessed March 2008.

  • Intergraph (2008). Intergraph: SmartPlant foundation. Online available at http://www.intergraph.com/products/ppm/smartplant/default.aspx. Accessed March 2008.

  • Ion P, Miner R, eds. (1999) Mathematical Markup Language (MathML) 1.01 Specification. W3C Recommendation, revision of 7 July 1999. Online available at http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-MathML/. Accessed April 2007.

  • ISO (1994) Industrial automation systems and integration – Product data representation and exchange – Part 11: Description methods: The EXPRESS language reference manual. International Standard ISO 10303-11:1994, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2003) Industrial automation systems and integration – Integration of lifecycle data for process plants including oil and gas production facilities – Part 2: Data model. International Standard ISO 15926-2:2003, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2004) Industrial automation systems and integration – Integration of lifecycle data for process plants including oil and gas production facilities – Part 1: Overview and fundamental principles. International Standard ISO 15926-1:2004, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2005) Industrial automation systems and integration – Integration of lifecycle data for process plants including oil and gas production facilities – Part 7: Implementation methods for data exchange and integration. International Standard under development ISO/CD TS 15926-7, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2006) Industrial automation systems and integration – Integration of lifecycle data for process plants including oil and gas production facilities – Part 3: Ontology for geometry and topology. International Standard under development ISO/NP TS 15926-3, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2007) Industrial automation systems and integration – Integration of lifecycle data for process plants including oil and gas production facilities – Part 4: Initial reference data. International Standard ISO/TS 15926-4:2007, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 10303, Part 231 (1998) Process Engineering Data: Process Design and Process Specifications of Major Equipment. ISO TC 184/SC4/WG3 N740.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC 12207 (2008) Systems and Software Engineering – Software life cycle processes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson I, Booch G, Rumbaugh J (2003) The Unified Software Development Process: UML. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarke M, Marquardt W (1995) Design and Evaluation of Computer-Aided Process Modeling Tools. In: Davis J, Stephanopoulos G, Venkatasubramanian V (eds): Intelligent Systems in Process Engineering, AlChE Symp. Ser., 312 (92):97-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarke M, Gallersdörfer R, Jeusfeld MA, Staudt M, Eherer S (1995) ConceptBase – a deductive object base for meta data management. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 4 (2):167–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarke M, List T, Weidenhaupt K (1999) A process-integrated conceptual design environment for chemical engineering. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling. Springer, Berlin:520–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarke M, List T, Köller J (2000) The challenge of process data warehousing. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Very Large Databases. Morgan Kaufmann:473–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarke M, Lenzerini M, Vassiliou Y, Vassiliadis P (2003) Fundamentals of Data Warehouses. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrar M, Meersman R (2002) Scalability and knowledge reusability in ontology modeling. In: Proceedings of the International conference on Infrastructure for e-Business, e-Education, e-Science, and e-Medicine SSGRR2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen AK (1998) Generation of problem specific simulation models within an integrated computer aided system. PhD Thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnopp DC, Margolis DL, Rosenberg RC (1990) System Dynamics: A Unified Approach. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kifer M, Lausen G, Wu J (1995) Logical foundations of object-oriented and frame-based languages. JACM 42 (4):741–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killich S, Luczak H, Schlick C, Weißenbach M, Wiedenmaier S, Ziegler J (1999) Task modelling for cooperative work. Behaviour and Information Technology 18 (5):325-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y, Kang S, Lee S, Yoo S (2001) A distributed, open, intelligent product data management system. Int. J. Computer Integr. Manuf. 14:224–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura Y, Mizoguchi R (1999) Meta-functions of artifacts. In: Price C (ed.): Proceedings of the 13 th International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning. University of Aberystwyth:136–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura Y, Mizoguchi R (2003) Ontology-based description of functional design knowledge and its use in a functional way server. Expert Syst. Appl. 24 (2):153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura Y, Koji Y, Mizoguchi R (2006) An ontological model of device function: industrial deployment and lessons learned. Applied Ontology 1 (3-4):237–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein M (2002) Interpreting XML documents via an RDF schema ontology. In: Proceedings of the 13 th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications:889–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinker G, Bhola C, Dallemagne G, Marques D, McDermott J (1991) Usable and reusable programming constructs. Knowl. Acquis. 3 (2):117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klir GJ (1985) Architecture of Systems Problem Solving. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konda S, Monarch I, Sargent P, Subrahmanian E (1992) Shared memory in design: A unifying theme for research and practice. Res. Eng. Des. 4:23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopena J, Regli WC (2003) Functional modeling of engineering designs for the semantic web. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 26 (4):55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozaki K, Kitamura Y, Ikeda M, Mizoguchi R (2000) Development of an environment for building ontologies which is based on a fundamental consideration of “relationship” and “role”. In: Compton P, Hoffmann A (eds.): Proceedings of the 6th Pacific Knowledge Acquisition Workshop. University of New South Wales:205–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna R, Taylor R (1993) Multicomponent mass transfer: theory and applications. In: Cheremisino NP (ed): Handbook of Heat and Mass Transfer, Gulf Publishing Company, 2:259-432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krobb C, Lohmann B, Marquardt W (1998) The Chemical Engineering Data Model VeDa. Part 6: The Process of Model Development. Technical Report (LPT-1998-06), Lehrstuhl für Prozesstechnik, RWTH Aachen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Gupta R (1998) Fundamentals of Polymers. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang HJ (1947) Engineering Approach to Preliminary Cost Estimates, Chem. Eng. (New York):130-133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassila O, McGuinness D (2001) The Role of Frame-Based Representation on the Semantic Web. Technical Report (KSL-01-02), Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University. Online available at http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/KSL_Abstracts/KSL-01-02.html. Accessed October 2007.

  • Lauber J (1996) Methode zur funktionalen Beschreibung und Analyse von Produktionsprozessen als Basis zur Realisierung leittechnischer Lösungen. Dissertation, Lehrstuhl für Prozessleittechnik, RWTH Aachen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat D, Guha RV (1990) Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project. Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenspiel O (1999). Chemical Reaction Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linninger A (2000) Towards computer-aided model generation. In: Proceedings of the JSPS International Workshop on Safety-Assured Operation and Concurrent Engineering. Yokohama, Japan:C35–C49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linstrom PJ, Mallard WG, eds. (2005) NIST Chemistry WebBook. NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69, June 2005, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD. Online available at http://webbook.nist.gov.

  • Little EG, Rogova GL (2005) Ontology Meta-Model for building a situational picture of catastrophic events. In: 8th International Conference on Information Fusion 2005, DOI: 10.1109/ICIF. 2005.1591935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd CM, Halstead MDB, Nielsen PF (2004) CellML: its future, present and past. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 85 (2-3):433-450.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd JW (1987) Foundations of Logic Programming, 2nd edition. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann B, Marquardt W (1998) Entwicklungsprozesse für den konzeptionellen Entwurf. In: Nagl M, Westfechtel B (eds.): Integration von Entwicklungssystemen in Ingenieuranwendungen. Springer, Berlin:253-264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu ML, Batres R, Li HS, Naka Y (1997) A G2 based MDOOM testbed for concurrent process engineering. Comput. Chem. Eng. 21:11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier A, Schnurr HP, Sure Y (2003) Ontology-based information integration in the automotive industry. In: Proceedings of the 2 nd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2003), Florida:897-912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangold M, Angeles-Palacios O, Ginkel M, Kremling A, Waschler R, Kienle A, Gilles ED (2005) Computer-aided modeling of chemical and biological systems: methods, tools and applications. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44:2579–2591.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maropoulos PG (2003) Digital enterprise technology – defining perspectives and research priorities. Int. J. Computer Integr. Manuf. 16 (7/8):467–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt W (1992a) An object-oriented representation of structured process models. Comput. Chem. Eng. 16:329–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt W (1992b) Rechnergestützte Erstellung verfahrenstechnischer Prozessmodelle. Chem. Ing. Tech. 64:25-40

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt W (1994a) Trends in Computer-Aided Process Modeling. 5th International Symposium on Process Systems Engineering, PSE’94, Proceedings PSE’94:1-24

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt W (1994b) Computer-aided generation of chemical engineering process models. Int. Chem. Eng. 34:28–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt W (1995) Towards a Process Modeling Methodology. In: Berber, R: Methods of Model-Based Control. NATO-ASI E, Applied Sciences, 293, Kluwer, Dordrecht:3-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt W (1996) Trends in computer-aided process modeling. Comput. Chem. Eng. 20 (6/7):591–609.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt W, Nagl M (2004) Workflow and information centered support of design processes – the IMPROVE perspective. Comput. Chem. Eng. 29 (1):65–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt W, Gerstlauer A, Gilles ED (1993) Modeling and Representation of Complex Objects: A Chemical Engineering Perspective, 6th Int. Conf. on Industrial and Engineering Applications to Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems, Proceedings:219-228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt W, von Wedel L, Bayer B (2000) Perspectives on lifecycle process modeling. In: Malone MF, Trainham JA, Carnahan B (eds.): Foundations of Computer–Aided Process Design. AIChE:192–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson WS, Barton PI (2000) A differentiation index for partial differentialalgebraic equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 21:2295–2315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthes F (1959) Zur Systematik der chemischen Technologie – Teil 2, Chem. Tech. (Leipzig):536-543.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe WL, Smith JC, Harriott P (2004) Unit Operations in Chemical Engineering. 7th Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness DL (2002) Ontologies come of age. In: Fensel D, Hendler J, Lieberman H, Wahlster W (eds.): Spinning the Semantic Web: Bringing the World Wide Web to Its Full Potential. MIT Press:171–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin B, Bennett K (2005) Supervenience. Online available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/supervenience/. Accessed December 2006.

  • McMahon C, Lowe A, Culley SJ (2004) Knowledge management in engineering design, personalisation and codification. J. Eng. Des. 15 (4):307–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaught AD, Wilkinson A, eds. (1997) Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 2nd Edition. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK. Electronic version online available at http://goldbook.iupac.org/.

  • Mesihovic S, Malmqvist J, Pikosz P (2004) Product data management systembased support for engineering project management. J. Eng. Des. 15 (4):389–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miatidis M, Jarke M (2005) Integrating workflow extensions into a processintegrated environment for chemical engineering. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems:255–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miatidis M, Jarke M, Weidenhaupt K (2008) Using developers’ experience in cooperative design processes. In: Nagl M, Marquardt W (eds.): Collaborative and Distributed Chemical Engineering. Springer, Berlin:185–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller DC, Josephson JR, Elsass MJ, Davis JF, Chandrasekaran B (1997) Sharable Engineering Databases for Intelligent System Applications. Comput. Chem. Eng. 21:77-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky M (1975) A framework for representing knowledge. In: Winston PH (ed.): The Psychology of Computer Vision. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizoguchi R (2001) Ontological engineering: foundation of the next generation knowledge processing. In: Zhong N, Yao Y, Liu J, Ohsuga S (eds.): Web Intelligence: Research and Development. Springer, Berlin:44–57.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mizoguchi R, Vanwelkenhuysen J, Ikeda M (1995) Task ontologies for reuse of problem solving knowledge. In: Mars N (ed.): Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases: Knowledge Building and Knowledge Sharing. IOS Press, Amsterdam:46–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizoguchi R, Kozaki K, Sano T, Kitamura Y (2000) Construction and deployment of a plant ontology. In: Dieng R, Corby O (eds.): Proceedings of the 12th European Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management. Springer, Berlin:113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modell M, Reid RC (1983) Thermodynamics and its Applications. Second ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molitor R (2000) Unterstützung der Modellierung verfahrenstechnischer Prozesse durch Nicht-Standardinferenzen in Beschreibungslogiken. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, RWTH Aachen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morbach J, Marquardt W (2006) Wissenssprache im Anlagenbau – die Erstellung von Branchenleistungsverzeichnissen mit Hilfe von Ontologien. In: Schenk M (ed.): Industriearbeitskreis „Kooperation im Anlagenbau“: Arbeitsbericht 03/04. Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, Stuttgart:1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morbach J, Marquardt W (2008) Ontology-based integration and management of distributed design data. In: Nagl M, Marquardt W (eds.): Collaborative and Distributed Chemical Engineering. Springer, Berlin:647–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morbach J, Yang A, Marquardt W (2007) OntoCAPE – a large-scale ontology for chemical process engineering. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 20 (2):147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morbach J, Theißen M, Hai R, Marquardt W (2008a) An introduction to application domain modeling. In: Nagl M, Marquardt W (eds.): Collaborative and Distributed Chemical Engineering. Springer, Berlin:83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morbach J Bayer B, Yang A, Marquardt W (2008b) Product data models. In: Nagl M, Marquardt W (eds.): Collaborative and Distributed Chemical Engineering. Springer, Berlin:93–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morbach J, Hai R, Bayer B, Marquardt W (2008c) Document models. In: Nagl M, Marquardt W (eds.): Collaborative and Distributed Chemical Engineering. Springer, Berlin:111–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morbach J, Theißen M, Marquardt W (2008d) Integrated application domain models for chemical engineering. In: Nagl M, Marquardt W (eds.): Collaborative and Distributed Chemical Engineering. Springer, Berlin:169–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morbach J, Wiesner A, Marquardt W (2008e) OntoCAPE 2.0 – a (re)usable ontology for computer-aided process engineering. In: Braunschweig B, Joulia X (eds.): 18th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering. Elsevier:991–996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morbach J, Wiesner A, Marquardt W (2008f) OntoCAPE 2.0 – The Meta Model. Technical Report (LPT-2008-24), Lehrstuhl für Prozesstechnik, RWTH Aachen University. Online available at http://www.avt.rwth-aachen.de/AVT/index.php?id=541&L=0&Nummer=LPT-2008-24.

  • Morbach J, Bayer B, Wiesner A, Yang A, Marquardt W (2008 g) OntoCAPE 2.0 – The Upper Level. Technical Report (LPT-2008-25), Lehrstuhl für Prozesstechnik, RWTH Aachen University. Online available at http://www.avt.rwth-aachen.de/AVT/index.php?id=541&L=0&Nummer=LPT-2008-25.

  • Morbach J, Yang A, Wiesner A, Marquardt W (2008 h) OntoCAPE 2.0 – Supporting Concepts. Technical Report (LPT-2008-26), Lehrstuhl für Prozesstechnik, RWTH Aachen University. Online available at http://www.avt.rwth-aachen.de/AVT/index.php?id=541&L=0&Nummer=LPT-2008-26.

  • Morbach J, Yang A, Marquardt W (2008i) OntoCAPE 2.0 – Materials. Technical Report (LPT-2008-27), Lehrstuhl für Prozesstechnik, RWTH Aachen University. Online available at http://www.avt.rwth-aachen.de/AVT/in-dex.php?id=541&L=0&Nummer=LPT-2008-27.

  • Morbach J, Yang A, Marquardt W (2008j) OntoCAPE 2.0 – Mathematical Models. Technical Report (LPT-2008-28), Lehrstuhl für Prozesstechnik, RWTH Aachen University. Online available at http://www.avt.rwth-aachen.de/AVT/index.php?id=541&L=0&Nummer=LPT-2008-28.

  • Morgenstern L, Riecken D (2005) SNAP: An action-based ontology for e-commerce reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 1 st Workshop “FOMI 2005” – Formal Ontologies Meet Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss GP, ed. (1996) Basic terminology of stereochemistry. IUPAC Recommendations 1996, Pure Appl. Chem. 68:2193-2222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss GP, Smith PAS, Tavernier D, ed. (1995) Glossary of class names of organic compounds and reactive intermediates based on structure. IUPAC Recommendations 1995, Pure Appl. Chem. 67:51307-1375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller P, ed. (1994) Glossary of terms used in physical organic chemistry. IUPAC Reccomendations 1994, Pure Appl. Chem. 66:1077-1184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagl M, Marquardt W, eds. (2008) Collaborative and Distributed Chemical Engineering: From Understanding to Substantial Design Process Support. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neches R, Fikes R, Finin T, Gruber T, Patil R, Senator T, Swartout WR (1991) Enabling technology for knowledge sharing. AI Mag. 12 (3):36–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell A (1982) The knowledge level. Artif. Intel. 18 (1):87–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niles P (2001) Towards a standard upper ontology. In: Guarino N, Welty C, Smith B (eds.): Proceedings of the 2 nd International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS-2001). ACM:2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The Knowledge Creating Company. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noonan H (2006) Identity. In: Zalta EN (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2006 Edition). Online available at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2006/entries/identity/. Accessed January 2008.

  • Noumonon Consulting Limited (2008) Open Access to Intelligent Process Plant Models. Online available at http://www.noumenon.co.uk/. Accessed April 2008.

  • Noy NF, Klein M (2004) Ontology evolution: not the same as schema evolution. Knowl. Inform. Syst. 6:428–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noy N, Rector A, eds. (2006) Defining N-ary Relations on the Semantic Web. W3C Working Group Note, 12 April 2006. Online available at http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/. Accessed December 2007.

  • Oberle D, Volz R, Motik B, Staab S (2004) An extensible ontology software environment. In: Staab S, Studer R (eds.): Handbook on Ontologies. Springer, Berlin:311–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odell JJ (1994) Six different kinds of composition. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming 5(8). Online available at http://www.conradbock.org/compkind.html. Accessed December 2006.

  • OLS – Ontology Lookup Service (2006) ChEBI Ontology Browser. Online available at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ontology-lookup/browse.do?ontName=CHEBI. Accessed February 2007.

  • Ontoprise GmbH (2009) OntoStudio. Online available at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ontology-lookup/browse.do?ontName=CHEBI. Accessed April 2009.

  • OWL (2002) OWL representation ontology. Online available at http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl. Accessed October 2007.

  • Pâslaru-Bontaş E (2007) Contextual Approach to Ontology Reuse: Methodology, Methods and Tools for the Semantic Web. PhD Thesis, FU Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel-Schneider PF, Horrocks I (2006) OWL 1.1 Web Ontology Language Overview. W3C Member Submission, 19 December 2006. Online available at http://www.w3.org/Submission/owl11-overview/. Accessed October 2007.

  • Paton NW, Goble CA, Bechhofer S (2000) Knowledge-based information integration systems. Inform. Software Technol. 42 (5):299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patzak G (1982) Systemtechnik – Planung komplexer innovativer Systeme. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins JD, Sargent RWH, Vazquez-Roman R, Cho JH (1996) Computer generation of process models. Comput. Chem. Eng. 20 (6):635–639.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peters MS, Timmerhaus KD (1991) Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto HS, Gomez-Perez A, Martins JP (1999) Some issues on ontology integration. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI’99 Workshop on Ontologies and Problem Solving Methods.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl K, Weidenhaupt K, Dömges R, Haumer P, Jarke M, Klamma R (1999) PRIME: Towards Process-Integrated Environments. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 8 (4):343–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polke M, ed. (1994) Process Control Engineering. VCH, Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preisig HA (1995) MODELLER – An object-oriented computer-aided modeling tool. In: Biegler LT, Doherty MF (eds.): Foundations of Computer-Aided Process Design. AIChE:328–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prolist (2009) Prolist. Online available at: http://www.prolist.org.

  • PTC (2008) Windchill. Online available at http://www.ptc.com/products/wind-chill/. Accessed May 2008.

  • Pure-Systems (2008) Pure::Variants. Online available at http://www.pure-systems.com. Accessed September 2008.

  • Racer Systems (2006) What is Racer Pro? Webpage, http://www.racer-systemscom/products/racerpro/index.phtml. Accessed December 2006.

  • Racer Systems (2007) RacerPro Reference Manual. Online available at http://www.racer-systems.com/products/racerpro/reference-manual-1-9-2-beta.pdf. Accessed June 2008.

  • Raddatz M, Schlüter M, Brandt SC (2006) Identification and reuse of experience knowledge in continuous production processes. Presented at the 9th IFAC Symposium on Automated Systems Based on Human Skill and Knowledge. Online available at http://www-i5.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/i5new/publications/pubs2006.html. Accessed May 2008.

  • Ramkrishna D (1985) The status of population balances. Rev. Chem. Eng. 3:49-95.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rector A (2003) Modularisation of domain ontologies implemented in description logics and related formalisms including OWL. In: Genari J (ed.): Knowledge Capture 2003. ACM Press:121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rector A, ed. (2005) Representing Specified Values in OWL: “value partitions” and “value sets”. W3C Working Group Note, 17 May 2005. Online available at http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-specified-values. Accessed November 2007.

  • Rector A, Welty C, eds. (2005) Simple part-whole relations in OWL Ontologies. W3C Editor’s Draft, 11 August 2005. Online available at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/SimplePartWhole/. Accessed November 2007.

  • Rector A, Solomon WD, Nowlan WA, Rush TW (1995) A terminology server for medical language and medical information systems. Methods Inf. Med. 34 (1/2):147–157.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rector A, Drummond N, Horridge M, Rogers J, Knublauch H, Stevens R, Wang H, Wroe C (2004) OWL pizzas: practical experience of teaching OWLDL: common errors & common patterns. In: Motta E, Shadbolt N, Stutt A, Gibbins N (eds.): Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Acquisition (EKAW). Springer:63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ T, Valente A, MacGregor R, Swartout W (1999) Practical experiences in trading off ontology usability and reusability. In: Proceedings of the 12th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop. SRDG Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler SI (1999) Chemical and Engineering Thermodynamics. Third ed., John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent RWH (1998) A Functional Approach to Process Synthesis and its Application to Distillation Systems. Comput. Chem. Eng. 22:31-45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schembra M (1991) Daten und Methoden zur Vorkalkulation des Anlagekapitalbedarfs von Chemieanlagen. PhD thesis, Technische Universität Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider L (2003) How to build a foundational ontology: the object-centered high-level reference ontology OCHRE. In: Günter A, Kruse R, Neumann B (eds.): KI 2003: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Berlin: 120–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler H, ed. (1999) Prozessführung. Oldenbourg, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze-Kremer S (1998) Ontologies for molecular biology. In: Proceedings of the Third Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. AAAI Press:693–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schummer J (1998) The chemical core of chemistry I: a conceptual approach. HYLE – Int. J. Philosophy Chem. 4(2):129-162.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seader JD, Henley EJ (1998) Separation Process Principles. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seipel D, Baumeister J (2004) Declarative methods for the evaluation of ontologies. Künstliche Intelligenz 18 (4):51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheremetov L, Batyrshin I, Chi M, Vergara E, Rosales A (2007) Knowledgebased collaborative engineering of pipe networks in the upstream and downstream petroleum industry. In: Shen W, Yang Y, Yong J, Hawryszkiewycz I, Lin Z, Barthes JPA, Maher ML, Hao Q, Tran MH (eds.): Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD 2007). IEEE:458–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shreve RN (1978) Chemical Process Industries. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens PLM Software (2008) Teamcenter. Online available at http://www.ugs.com/products/teamcenter/. Accessed May 2008.

  • Simmons B (2007) Mathwords – website. Online available at http://www.mathwords.com/. Accessed October 2007.

  • Simons P (1987) Parts: A Study in Ontology. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith B (1996) Mereotopology: a theory of parts and boundaries. Data Know. Eng. 20 (3):287–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith B (2006) Against idiosyncrasy in ontology development. In: Bennett B, Fellbaum C (eds.): Formal Ontology in Information Systems. IOS Press:15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith EG (1968) The Wiswesser Line-Formula Chemical Notation. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JM (1981) Chemical Engineering Kinetics. 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JM, Van Ness HC (1975) Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics, 3rd Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith MK, Welty C, McGuinness DL, eds. (2004) OWL Web Ontology Languages Guide. W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004. Online available at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/. Accessed October 2007.

  • Souza D, Marquardt W (1998a) The Chemical Engineering Data Model VeDa. Part 2: Structural Modeling Objects. Technical Report (LPT-1998-02), Lehrstuhl für Prozesstechnik, RWTH Aachen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza D, Marquardt W (1998b) The Chemical Engineering Data Model VeDa. Part 3: Geometrical Modeling Objects. Technical Report (LPT-1998-03), Lehrstuhl für Prozesstechnik, RWTH Aachen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowa JF (1995) Top-level ontological categories. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 43 (5/6):669–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (2008) The Protégé Ontology Editor and Knowledge Acquisition System. Online available at http://protege.stanford.edu/. Accessed January 2008.

  • Stein SE, Heller SR, Tchekhovski D (2003) An open standard for chemical structure representation – the IUPAC Chemical Identifier. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Nimes International Chemical Information Conference:131-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephanopoulos G, Henning G, Leone H (1990) MODEL.LA. A modeling language for process engineering. I. The formal framework. Comput. Chem. Eng. 14 (8):813–846.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stuckenschmidt H, Klein M (2003) Integrity and change in modular ontologies. In: Gottlob G, Walsh T (eds.): IJCAI-03 – Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann:900–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Studer S, Benjamins VR, Fensel D (1998) Knowledge engineering principles and methods. Data Knowl. Eng. 25 (1/2):161–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian E, Rachuri S (2008) Guest editorial: special issue on “engineering informatics”. Trans. ASME, J. Computing and Information Science in Engineering. 8:010301-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szykman S, Sriram RD, Bochenek C, Racz JW, Senfaute J (2000) Design repositories: engineering design’s new knowledge base. IEEE Intell. Syst. 15 (3):48-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szykman S, Sriram RD, Regli WC (2001) The role of knowledge in next-generation product development systems. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 1 (1):3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TGL 25000 (1974) Chemical Engineering Unit Operations – Classification. Departmental Standard of the German Democratic Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teijgeler H (2007) InfowebML, OWL-based Information Exchange and Integration based on ISO 15926. Online available at http://www.infowebml.ws/. Accessed November 2007.

  • Theißen M, Marquardt W (2008) Decision models. In: Nagl M, Marquardt W (eds.): Collaborative and Distributed Chemical Engineering. Springer, Berlin:153–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theißen M, Hai R, Marquardt W (2008a) Computer-assisted work process modeling in chemical engineering. In: Nagl M, Marquardt W (eds.): Collaborative and Distributed Chemical Engineering. Springer, Berlin:656–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theißen M, Hai R, Marquardt W (2008b) Design process modeling in chemical engineering. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 8 (1), 011007 (9 pages).

    Google Scholar 

  • Theißen M, Hai R, Morbach J, Schneider R, Marquardt W (2008c) Scenario-based analysis of industrial work processes. In: Nagl M, Marquardt W (eds.): Collaborative and Distributed Chemical Engineering. Springer, Berlin:433–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theißen M, Hai R, Marquardt W (2009) A framework for work process modeling in the chemical industries. 8th World Congress of Chemical Engineering (WCCE8). Montréal, August 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomé B, ed. (1993) Systems Engineering: Principles and Practice of Computer - based Systems Engineering. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiller MM (2001) Introduction to Physical Modeling with Modelica. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tränkle F (2000) Rechnerunterstützte Modellierung verfahrenstechnischer Prozesse für die Simulationsumgebung DIVA. Fortschritt-Berichte VDI 309, Reihe 20, Nr. 309. VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tränkle F, Gerstlauer A, Zeitz M, Gilles ED (1997) Application of the modeling and simulation environment PROMOT/DIVA to the modeling of distillation processes. Comput. Chem. Eng. 21:841–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsarkov D, Horrocks I (2007) FaCT++. Online available at http://owl.man.ac.uk/factplusplus/. Accessed January 2008.

  • Ullman D (2002) Toward the ideal mechanical engineering design support system. Research in Engineering Design 13 (2), 55– 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unbehauen H (1989) Regelungstechnik I. Vieweg, Braunschweig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uschold M, Grüninger M (1996) Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 11 (2):93–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uschold M, King M, Moralee S, Zorgios Y (1998) The enterprise ontology. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 13:31–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente A, Breuker J (1996) Towards principled core ontologies. In: Gaines BR, Mussen M (eds.): Proceedings of the 10th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop. SDRG Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valente A, Russ T, MacGregor R, Swartout W (1999) Building and (re)using an ontology of air campaign planning. IEEE Intell. Syst. 14 (1):27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Heijst G, Schreiber AT, Wielinga BJ (1997a) Using explicit ontologies in KBS development. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 46 (2/3):183–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Heijst G, Schreiber AT, Wielinga BJ (1997b) Roles are not classes: a reply to Nicola Guarino. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 46 (2/3):311–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varzi A (2006) Mereology. In: Zalta EN (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2006 Edition). Online available at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2006/entries/mereology/. Accessed January 2007.

  • Venkatasubramanian V (2009) Drowning in data: informatics and modeling challenges in a data-rich and networked world. AIChE J. 55:2–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatasubramanian V, Zhao C, Joglekar G, Jain A, Hailemariam L, Suresh P, Akkisetty P, Morris K, Reklaitis GV (2006) Ontological informatics infrastructure for pharmaceutical product development and manufacturing. Comput. Chem. Eng. 30 (10/12):1482–1496.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • VIM (1993) International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology (VIM), 2nd Edition. Jointly prepared by ISO, IEC, BIPM, IFCC, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML. Published by ISO, Geneva, as ISO Guide 99:1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser PRS, Cui Z (1998) Heterogeneous ontology structures for distributed architectures. In: Proceedings of the ECAI-98 Workshop on Applications of Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods:112–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser U, Stuckenschmidt H, Wache H, Vögele T (2000) Enabling technologies for interoperability. In: Visser U, Pundt H (eds.): Workshop: Information Sharing: Methods and Applications at the 14th International Symposium of Computer Science for Environmental Protection:35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt M (1996) Neuere Methoden der Investitionsrechnung in der Chemischen Industrie. Diploma thesis, Technische Universität Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wedel L (2002) CapeML – A Model Exchange Language for Chemical Process Modeling. Technical Report (LPT-2002-16), Lehrstuhl für Prozesstechnik, RWTH Aachen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wedel L, Marquardt W (1999) The Chemical Engineering Data Model VeDa. Part 5: Material Modeling Objects. Technical Report (LPT-1998-05), Lehrstuhl für Prozesstechnik, RWTH Aachen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wedel L, Marquardt W (2000) ROME: a repository to support the integration of models over the lifecycle of model-based engineering. In: Pierucci S (ed.): Proceedings of the European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering – ESCAPE 10. Elsevier:535–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • W3C (2000) The RDFS representation ontology. Web resource. Online available at http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema. Accessed June 2008.

  • W3C (2002) The OWL representation ontology. Online available at http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl. Accessed October 2007.

  • W3C (2006) Extensible Markup Language (XML). Online available at http://www.w3.org/XML/. Accessed December 2007.

  • Wache H, Vögele T, Visser U, Stuckenschmidt H, Schuster G, Neumann H, Hübner S (2001) Ontology-based integration of information – a survey of existing approaches. In: Goméz-Pérez A, Gruninger M, Stuckenschmidt H, Uschold M (eds.): Proceedings of the IJCAI-01 Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing. CEUR Workshop Proceedings:108–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weininger D (1988) SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 28:31-36.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weisstein E (2007) MathWorld – website. Online available at http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ Accessed October 2007.

  • Wesselingh JA, Krishna R (2000) Mass transfer in multicomponent mixtures. Delft University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerberg AW, Subrahmanian E, Reich Y, Konda S, the n-dim group (1997) Designing the process design process. Comput. Chem. Eng. 21:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner A, Morbach J, Marquardt W (2007) An overview on OntoCAPE and its latest applications. In: Proceedings of the 2007 AIChE Annual Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner A, Morbach J, Bayer B, Yang A, Marquardt W (2008a) OntoCAPE 2.0 – Chemical Process System. Technical Report (LPT-2008-29), Lehrstuhl für Prozesstechnik, RWTH Aachen University. Online available at http://www.avt.rwth-aachen.de/AVT/index.php?id=541&L=0&Nummer=LPT-2008-29.

  • Wiesner A, Morbach J, Marquardt W (2008b) Semantic data integration for process engineering desgin data. In: Proceedings of the 10 th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems – ICEIS 2008:190-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm Jr RG (1996) In Search of the Cheshire Cat: The Invisible Automation System Paradox. ISA Transactions 35:321-327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windream GmbH (2008) Managing Documents by Windream. Online available at http://www.windream.com/. Accessed May 2008.

  • Wüsteneck KD (1963) Zur philosophischen Verallgemeinerung und Bestimmung des Modellbegriffs. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 1963:1504 et sqq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang A, Marquardt W (2004) An ontology-based approach to conceptual process modeling. In: Barbarosa-Póvoa A, Matos H (eds.): Proceedings of the European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering – ESCAPE 14. Elsevier:1159–1164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang A, Schlüter M, Bayer B, Krüger J, Haberstroh E, Marquardt W (2003) A concise conceptual model for material data and its applications in process engineering. Comput. Chem. Eng. 27 (4):595–609.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang A, Morbach J, Marquardt W (2004a) From conceptualization to model generation: the roles of ontologies in process modeling. In: Floudas CA, Agrawal R (eds.): Sixth International Conference on Foundations of Computer-Aided Process Design. Omnipress:591–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang A, Marquardt W, Stalker I, Fraga I, Serra M, Piñol D, Paen D, Roux P, Braunschweig B (2004b) Principles and Informal Specification of OntoCAPE. COGents. Technical Report, COGents Project, Information Society Technologies Program IST-2001-34431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang A, Braunschweig B, Fraga ES, Guessoum Z, Marquardt W, Nadjemi O, Paen D, Piñol D, Roux P, Sama S, Serra M, Stalker I (2008) A multi-agent system to facilitate component-based process modeling and design. Comput. Chem. Eng. 32 (10):2290–2305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. AVT-Process Systems Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52056, Aachen, Germany

    Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Marquardt, Jan Morbach Dipl. Ing. & Andreas Wiesner Dipl. Ing.

  2. Fac. Engineering & Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, GU2 7XH, Guildford, UK

    Dr. Aidong Yang

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Marquardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan Morbach Dipl. Ing.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andreas Wiesner Dipl. Ing.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dr. Aidong Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Marquardt .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marquardt, W., Morbach, J., Wiesner, A., Yang, A. (2010). Bibliography. In: OntoCAPE. RWTHedition. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04655-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04655-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04654-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04655-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation