Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
OntoCAPE

Part of the book series: RWTHedition ((RWTH))

  • 698 Accesses

Abstract

Data, information, knowledge, understanding, and wisdom (Ackoff 1989) drive the society, economy, and science. Data refers to a collection of symbols without any meaning beyond its existence. Information refers to a set of data which have been given a meaning by formulating relations between the data elements in a given context. Knowledge constitutes a collection of information with the intention of a certain kind of use. Understanding (or reasoning) refers to an analytic and cognitive process, which takes some knowledge as its input to infer new knowledge as its output by some kind of interpolation. In contrast to understanding, wisdom is an extrapolative and non-deterministic process to provide (i) understanding where there was no understanding before and (ii) a kind of knowledge which cannot be inferred solely by analytical means from available knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackoff RL (1989) From data to wisdom. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 16:3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borst P, Akkermans JM, Top JL (1997) Engineering ontologies. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 46:365–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunschweig B, Gani R, eds. (2002) Software Architecture and Tools for Computer Aided Process Engineering. Elsevier Science B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallaher MP, O’Connor AC, Dettbarn Jr JL, Gilday LT (2004) Cost Analysis of Inadequate Interoperability in the U.S. Capital Facilities Industry. Technical Report (NIST GCR 04-867), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber TR (1995) Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 43 (5/6):907–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEEE (1990) IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology. IEEE Standard 610.12-1990, Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineering, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrar M, Meersmann R (2002) Scalability and knowledge reusability in ontology modeling. In: Proceedings of the International conference on Infrastructure for e-Business, e-Education, e-Science, and e-Medicine SSGRR2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinker G, Bhola C, Dallemagne G, Marques D, McDermott J (1991) Usable and reusable programming constructs. Knowl. Acquis. 3 (2):117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konda S, Monarch I, Sargent P, Subrahmanian E (1992) Shared memory in design: A unifying theme for research and practice. Res. Eng. Des. 4:23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt W, von Wedel L, Bayer B (2000) Perspectives on lifecycle process modeling. In: Malone MF, Trainham JA, Carnahan B (eds.): Foundations of Computer–Aided Process Design. AIChE:192–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagl M, Marquardt W, eds. (2008) Collaborative and Distributed Chemical Engineering: From Understanding to Substantial Design Process Support. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neches R, Fikes R, Finin T, Gruber T, Patil R, Senator T, Swartout WR (1991) Enabling technology for knowledge sharing. AI Mag. 12 (3);36–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The Knowledge Creating Company. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pâslaru-Bontaş E (2007) Contextual Approach to Ontology Reuse: Methodology, Methods and Tools for the Semantic Web. PhD Thesis, FU Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ T, Valente A, MacGregor R, Swartout W (1999) Practical experiences in trading off ontology usability and reusability. In: Proceedings of the 12th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop. SRDG Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian E, Rachuri S (2008) Guest editorial: special issue on “engineering informatics”. Trans. ASME, J. Computing and Information Science in Engineering. 8:010301-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatasubramanian V (2009) Drowning in data: informatics and modeling challenges in a data-rich and networked world. AIChE J. 55:2–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Marquardt .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marquardt, W., Morbach, J., Wiesner, A., Yang, A. (2010). Introduction. In: OntoCAPE. RWTHedition. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04655-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04655-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04654-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04655-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics