Abstract
Increases in international trade have a variety of effects on the environment through the location, scale, and techniques of production. International trade may also have special effects on transboundary resources, such as international rivers as trade provides greater opportunities for policy coordination between trading partners who share a resource. This chapter discusses several mechanisms by which trade may facilitate coordination: trade may provide opportunities for linkage between environmental and trade concessions, facilitate implicit side payments, grant countries direct leverage over other countries’ production, and instill a perception of shared goals between countries. An empirical section reports a test of the effects of globalization (interpreted in the regression equations as overall trade) and trade specifically between countries sharing a natural resource. The United Nation’s Global Environmental Monitoring System (GEMS) provides data on water quality at river monitoring stations around the world. We have coded these stations to indicate whether the rivers cross international borders, and if so, which countries share the river. We then merged these data with information on bilateral trade between upstream and downstream countries and characteristics of these countries such as their income levels and trade openness. The results suggest that water pollution is lower in rivers shared between countries with more trade; supporting the hypothesis that trade promotes coordination of environmental policies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
They do not employ a multiple regression analysis, so omitted variables are a potential issue in evaluating their results. In addition, the direction of causality is difficult to sort out for some hypotheses.
- 2.
The empirical analysis presented here is based on Sigman (2004), which describes the methodology, data set, and sensitivity analyses in greater detail.
- 3.
The early papers in the environmental Kuznets literature are Selden and Song (1994) and Grossman and Krueger (1995). For a recent survey, see Stern (2004).
- 4.
For a formal model suggesting that the use of “sticks” may be more effective in protecting the environment than a reliance on “carrots” alone, see Chang (1997). Recent rulings by World Trade Organization tribunals suggest that countries may impose environmental trade restrictions without violating the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. For a discussion of the legal status of such trade measures, see Chang (2005).
- 5.
For a discussion of such trade measures, see Chang (1995). Countries may impose such restrictions without violating the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, as discussed in Chang (2005).
- 6.
It would be interesting to look at other pollutants, such as pathogens, that have a direct effect on human health. Pathogens, however, do not travel more than a few miles downstream, so cross-border spillovers are less important.
- 7.
The Penn World Table (Heston et al. 2001) provides annual income levels standardized for crosscountry comparisons.
- 8.
Although addressing this heterogeneity is desirable, country effects may absorb some relevant variation in pollution levels. If countries must set environmental policies at a national level, they may not be able to reduce pollution only on rivers shared with countries with whom they have an extensive trade relationship. They might still free ride, however, by choosing lower national pollution control than socially optimal. The effect of trade on these deviations will not be detected with country effects included.
- 9.
We constructed this variable using flow direction from the US Geologic Survey’s Global Hydro1K database. Hydro1K contains the direction that water flows in a grid of 1 km by 1 km cells (based on the cell’s altitude relative to its neighbors). The “flow accumulation” function of ArcView then makes it possible to estimate the upstream drainage area for all cells in the grid. Weighting the upstream cells by their estimated population returns a grid of total upstream population, which was then used to attribute upstream population to the location of the station. The upstream population values are noisy because the calculated location of the river (based on flow accumulation) sometimes does not correspond to its actual location. These differences might result from an insufficiently fine resolution of the Hydro1K flow direction grid. There is no reason to believe the inaccuracies are correlated with heterogeneity relevant to the analysis.
References
Andreoni J, Levinson A (2001) The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve. J Public Econ 80:269-86
Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? Am Econ Rev 91:877-908
Barrett S, Graddy K (2000) Freedom, growth, and the environment. Environ Dev Econ 5:433-56
Bernauer T (1996) Protecting the Rhine River against chloride pollution. In: Keohane RO, Levy MA (eds) Institutions for environmental aid: Pitfalls and promise. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 201-32
Bowie GL et al (1985) Rates, constants, and kinetics formulations in surface water quality modeling, 2nd edn. USEPA, Washington, DC
Brunnermeier SB, Levinson A (2004) Examining the evidence on environmental regulations and industry location. J Environ Dev 13:6-41
Chang HF (1995) An economic analysis of trade measures to protect the global environment. Georget Law J 83:2131-213
Chang HF (1997) Carrots, sticks, and international externalities. Int Rev Law Econ 17:309-24
Chang HF (2005) Environmental trade measures, the shrimp-turtle rulings, and the ordinary meaning of the text of the GATT. Chapman Law Rev 8:25-51
Congleton RD (1992) Political institutions and pollution control. Rev Econ Stat 74:412-21
Conte Grand M (1999) Do regional environmental agreements have any effect on water quality? Universidad del CEMA Working Paper. http://ideas.repec.org/p/cem/doctra/141.html
Copeland BR (1996) Pollution content tariffs, environmental rent shifting and the control of cross border pollution. J Int Econ 40:459-76
Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2003) Trade and the environment: theory and evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Dean JM (2002) Does trade liberalization harm the environment? A new test. Can J Econ 35:819-842
Dinar S (2006) Assessing side-payment and cost-sharing patterns in international water agreements: the geographic and economic connection. Polit Geogr 25:412-37
Dinar S (2007) International water treaties: Negotiation and cooperation along transboundary rivers. Routledge, London
Giordano M (2003) Managing the quality of international rivers: Global principles and basin practice. Nat Resour J 43:111-36
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1993) Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. In: Garber P (ed) The U.S.-Mexico free trade agreement. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 13-56
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Quart J Econ 110:353-77
Hamner J, Wolf AT (1998) Patterns in international water resource treaties: The Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy. 1997 Yearbook
Heston A, Summers R, Aten B (2001) Penn World Table Version 6.0. Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania (CICUP), December 2001
International Network of Basin Organizations (INBO) (2005). http://www.inbo-news.org Viewed March 14, 2005
Kriström B, Riera P (1996) Is the income elasticity of environmental improvements less than one? Environ Resour Econ 7:45-55
LimĂŁo N (2005) Trade policy, cross-border externalities and lobbies: Do linked agreements enforce more cooperative outcomes? J Int Econ 67:175-99
Mandel R (1992) Sources of international river basin disputes. Conflict Quart 12:25-56
Neumayer E (2002) Does trade openness promote multilateral environmental cooperation? World Econ 25:815-32
Reppelin-Hill V (1999) Trade and environment: An empirical analysis of the technology effect in the steel industry. J Environ Econ Manag 38:283-301
Selden TM, Song D (1994) Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution? J Environ Econ Manag 27:147-62
Sigman H (2004) Does trade promote environmental coordination? Pollution in international rivers. Contrib to Econ Anal and Pol 3, Issue 2, Article 2
Statistics Canada (1998) World Trade Analyzer 1980-96 (Statistics Canada, Ottawa) (CDROM)
Stern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 32:1414-39
Tobler W, Deichmann U, Gottsegen J, Maloy K (1995) The Global Demography Project, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, UC Santa Barbara, Technical Report TR-95-6
Wolf A (2004) International Freshwater Treaties Database, http://www.transboundarywaters.edu Viewed June 14, 2004
Wolf A, Natharius J, Danielson J, Ward B, Pender J (1999) International river basins of the world. Int J Water Resour Dev 15:387-427
Wolf AT, Yoffe SB, Giordano M (2003) International waters: Identifying basins at risk. Water Pol 5:29-60
Acknowledgements
This material is based in part upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 9876498. We are grateful to participants at the IFPRI conference and reviewers for helpful comments and to Conan Crum for his help with the empirical analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sigman, H., Chang, H.F. (2010). Implications of Globalization and Trade for Water Quality in Transboundary Rivers. In: Ringler, C., Biswas, A., Cline, S. (eds) Global Change: Impacts on Water and food Security. Water Resources Development and Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04615-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04615-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04614-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04615-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)