Skip to main content

Implications of Globalization and Trade for Water Quality in Transboundary Rivers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Change: Impacts on Water and food Security

Part of the book series: Water Resources Development and Management ((WRDM))

Abstract

Increases in international trade have a variety of effects on the environment through the location, scale, and techniques of production. International trade may also have special effects on transboundary resources, such as international rivers as trade provides greater opportunities for policy coordination between trading partners who share a resource. This chapter discusses several mechanisms by which trade may facilitate coordination: trade may provide opportunities for linkage between environmental and trade concessions, facilitate implicit side payments, grant countries direct leverage over other countries’ production, and instill a perception of shared goals between countries. An empirical section reports a test of the effects of globalization (interpreted in the regression equations as overall trade) and trade specifically between countries sharing a natural resource. The United Nation’s Global Environmental Monitoring System (GEMS) provides data on water quality at river monitoring stations around the world. We have coded these stations to indicate whether the rivers cross international borders, and if so, which countries share the river. We then merged these data with information on bilateral trade between upstream and downstream countries and characteristics of these countries such as their income levels and trade openness. The results suggest that water pollution is lower in rivers shared between countries with more trade; supporting the hypothesis that trade promotes coordination of environmental policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    They do not employ a multiple regression analysis, so omitted variables are a potential issue in evaluating their results. In addition, the direction of causality is difficult to sort out for some hypotheses.

  2. 2.

    The empirical analysis presented here is based on Sigman (2004), which describes the methodology, data set, and sensitivity analyses in greater detail.

  3. 3.

    The early papers in the environmental Kuznets literature are Selden and Song (1994) and Grossman and Krueger (1995). For a recent survey, see Stern (2004).

  4. 4.

    For a formal model suggesting that the use of “sticks” may be more effective in protecting the environment than a reliance on “carrots” alone, see Chang (1997). Recent rulings by World Trade Organization tribunals suggest that countries may impose environmental trade restrictions without violating the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. For a discussion of the legal status of such trade measures, see Chang (2005).

  5. 5.

    For a discussion of such trade measures, see Chang (1995). Countries may impose such restrictions without violating the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, as discussed in Chang (2005).

  6. 6.

    It would be interesting to look at other pollutants, such as pathogens, that have a direct effect on human health. Pathogens, however, do not travel more than a few miles downstream, so cross-border spillovers are less important.

  7. 7.

    The Penn World Table (Heston et al. 2001) provides annual income levels standardized for crosscountry comparisons.

  8. 8.

    Although addressing this heterogeneity is desirable, country effects may absorb some relevant variation in pollution levels. If countries must set environmental policies at a national level, they may not be able to reduce pollution only on rivers shared with countries with whom they have an extensive trade relationship. They might still free ride, however, by choosing lower national pollution control than socially optimal. The effect of trade on these deviations will not be detected with country effects included.

  9. 9.

    We constructed this variable using flow direction from the US Geologic Survey’s Global Hydro1K database. Hydro1K contains the direction that water flows in a grid of 1 km by 1 km cells (based on the cell’s altitude relative to its neighbors). The “flow accumulation” function of ArcView then makes it possible to estimate the upstream drainage area for all cells in the grid. Weighting the upstream cells by their estimated population returns a grid of total upstream population, which was then used to attribute upstream population to the location of the station. The upstream population values are noisy because the calculated location of the river (based on flow accumulation) sometimes does not correspond to its actual location. These differences might result from an insufficiently fine resolution of the Hydro1K flow direction grid. There is no reason to believe the inaccuracies are correlated with heterogeneity relevant to the analysis.

References

  • Andreoni J, Levinson A (2001) The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve. J Public Econ 80:269-86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? Am Econ Rev 91:877-908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett S, Graddy K (2000) Freedom, growth, and the environment. Environ Dev Econ 5:433-56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernauer T (1996) Protecting the Rhine River against chloride pollution. In: Keohane RO, Levy MA (eds) Institutions for environmental aid: Pitfalls and promise. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 201-32

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie GL et al (1985) Rates, constants, and kinetics formulations in surface water quality modeling, 2nd edn. USEPA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier SB, Levinson A (2004) Examining the evidence on environmental regulations and industry location. J Environ Dev 13:6-41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang HF (1995) An economic analysis of trade measures to protect the global environment. Georget Law J 83:2131-213

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang HF (1997) Carrots, sticks, and international externalities. Int Rev Law Econ 17:309-24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang HF (2005) Environmental trade measures, the shrimp-turtle rulings, and the ordinary meaning of the text of the GATT. Chapman Law Rev 8:25-51

    Google Scholar 

  • Congleton RD (1992) Political institutions and pollution control. Rev Econ Stat 74:412-21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conte Grand M (1999) Do regional environmental agreements have any effect on water quality? Universidad del CEMA Working Paper. http://ideas.repec.org/p/cem/doctra/141.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland BR (1996) Pollution content tariffs, environmental rent shifting and the control of cross border pollution. J Int Econ 40:459-76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2003) Trade and the environment: theory and evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean JM (2002) Does trade liberalization harm the environment? A new test. Can J Econ 35:819-842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinar S (2006) Assessing side-payment and cost-sharing patterns in international water agreements: the geographic and economic connection. Polit Geogr 25:412-37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinar S (2007) International water treaties: Negotiation and cooperation along transboundary rivers. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano M (2003) Managing the quality of international rivers: Global principles and basin practice. Nat Resour J 43:111-36

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1993) Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. In: Garber P (ed) The U.S.-Mexico free trade agreement. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 13-56

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Quart J Econ 110:353-77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamner J, Wolf AT (1998) Patterns in international water resource treaties: The Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy. 1997 Yearbook

    Google Scholar 

  • Heston A, Summers R, Aten B (2001) Penn World Table Version 6.0. Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania (CICUP), December 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • International Network of Basin Organizations (INBO) (2005). http://www.inbo-news.org Viewed March 14, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriström B, Riera P (1996) Is the income elasticity of environmental improvements less than one? Environ Resour Econ 7:45-55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LimĂŁo N (2005) Trade policy, cross-border externalities and lobbies: Do linked agreements enforce more cooperative outcomes? J Int Econ 67:175-99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandel R (1992) Sources of international river basin disputes. Conflict Quart 12:25-56

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer E (2002) Does trade openness promote multilateral environmental cooperation? World Econ 25:815-32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reppelin-Hill V (1999) Trade and environment: An empirical analysis of the technology effect in the steel industry. J Environ Econ Manag 38:283-301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selden TM, Song D (1994) Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution? J Environ Econ Manag 27:147-62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigman H (2004) Does trade promote environmental coordination? Pollution in international rivers. Contrib to Econ Anal and Pol 3, Issue 2, Article 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada (1998) World Trade Analyzer 1980-96 (Statistics Canada, Ottawa) (CDROM)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 32:1414-39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler W, Deichmann U, Gottsegen J, Maloy K (1995) The Global Demography Project, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, UC Santa Barbara, Technical Report TR-95-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf A (2004) International Freshwater Treaties Database, http://www.transboundarywaters.edu Viewed June 14, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf A, Natharius J, Danielson J, Ward B, Pender J (1999) International river basins of the world. Int J Water Resour Dev 15:387-427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf AT, Yoffe SB, Giordano M (2003) International waters: Identifying basins at risk. Water Pol 5:29-60

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based in part upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 9876498. We are grateful to participants at the IFPRI conference and reviewers for helpful comments and to Conan Crum for his help with the empirical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hilary Sigman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sigman, H., Chang, H.F. (2010). Implications of Globalization and Trade for Water Quality in Transboundary Rivers. In: Ringler, C., Biswas, A., Cline, S. (eds) Global Change: Impacts on Water and food Security. Water Resources Development and Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04615-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics