Skip to main content

Biofuels, Food Security, and the Environment: A 2020/2050 Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Change: Impacts on Water and food Security

Part of the book series: Water Resources Development and Management ((WRDM))

Abstract

This chapter explores the impacts that rapid growth in biofuel demand has on agricultural prices, the consumption levels of key staple commodities, and the resulting impacts on food security and nutrition. The results clearly show a “food-versus-fuel” tradeoff that any national plan for biofuel expansion should take into account. Intensified biofuel production would likely increase the number of malnourished people. Rapid biofuel expansion also has a significant impact on international trade, particularly the global trade balance of maize. In addition, the results indicate that expansion of biofuels would increase the stress on regional water supplies only marginally; however, a significant expansion of biofuel production in areas facing water scarcity could exacerbate the problem. Aside from food security concerns, the expansion of biofuels entails additional tradeoffs with environmental sustainability, and the goals of overall economic growth and poverty reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    While there is concern about the carbon implications of the land use change effects that are induced by expansion of Brazilian ethanol, there has not been a strong consensus over their likely magnitude, given the complex interlinkages between land use for sugar, soybeans, rangeland and forest cover.

  2. 2.

    It should be noted, however, that we do not calculate the carbon balances that could be implied from land use changes.

References

  • Ahmed AU, Hill RV, Smith LC, Wiesmann DM, Frankenberger T, Gulati K, Quabili W, Yohannes Y (2007) The world’s most deprived: characteristics and causes of extreme poverty and hunger. 2020 Discussion Paper 43, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture (CA) (2007) Water for food, water for life: a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. Earthscan, London, and International Water Management Institute, Colombo

    Google Scholar 

  • de Fraiture C, Wichelns D, Rockstrom J, Kemp-Benedict E, Eriyagama N, Gordon LJ, Hanjra MA, Hoogeveen J, Huber-Lee A, Karlberg L (2007) Looking ahead to 2050: scenarios of alternative investment approaches. In: Water for food, water for life: a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. Earthscan, London and International Water Management Institute, Colombo

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2005) Bioenergy and the millennium development goals. Forestry Department, FAO, Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/j5135e/j5135e01.htm. Accessed on December 10, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundimeda H (2004) How ‘sustainable’ is the ‘sustainable development objective’ of CDM in developing countries like India? For Pol Econ 6(3/4):329-343

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurgel A, Reilly JM, Palsev S (2007) Potential land use implications of global biofuels industry. Special Issue of the JAFIO 5(9)

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt-Giménez E (2007) Biofuels: Myths of the agrofuels transition. Food First. http://www.foodfirst.org/node/1711

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogwijk MA, Faaij B, Eickhout B, de Vries, Turkenburg W (2005) Potential of biomass energy out to 2100, for four IPCC SRES land-use scenarios. Biomass Bioenergy 29:225-257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) (2009) Agriculture at a crossroads. The global report. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (IEA) (2006) World Energy Outlook. Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2007) World Economic Outlook Database. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammen DM (2006) Bioenergy in developing countries: experiences and prospects. In: Bioenergy and Agriculture: Promises and Challenges (2020) Focus 14. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Karekezi S, Kithyoma W (2006) Bioenergy and the poor. In: Bioenergy and agriculture: promises and challenges. 2020 Focus 14. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht FO (2005) World ethanol and biofuels report, vol 3. Tunbridge Wells, Kent, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludena CE, Hertel TW, Preckel PV, Foster K, Nin A (2007) Productivity growth and convergence in crop, ruminant and non-ruminant production: measurement and forecasts. Agric Econ 37(1):1-17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) (2005) Ecosystems and human wellbeing: scenarios. Findings of the scenarios working group. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Monfort J (2008) Despite obstacles, biofuels continue surge. Worldwatch vital signs online (April 23) available at: http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5450#notes

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (2007) Water implications of biofuels production in the United States. Water Science and Technology Board, Division on Earth and Life Studies, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, Committee on Water Implications of Biofuels Production in the United States

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005) 2005 OECD Agricultural Outlook Tables, 1970-2014. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/55/44/32980897.xls. Accessed July 10, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) (2006) Agricultural market impacts of future growth in the production of biofuels. OECD Papers 6(1):1-57

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development and the Food and Agricultural Organization (OECD/FAO) (2007) OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2007-2016. Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal D (2007) Rethinking current strategies for biofuel production in India. Presented at the International Conference on Linkages in Water and Energy in Developing Countries Organized by IWMI and FAO, ICRISAT, Hyderabad, India, January 29-30

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal D, Zilberman D (2007) Review of environmental, economic and policy aspects of biofuels, policy research. Working Paper No. 4341, The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosegrant MW, Cai X, Cline S (2002) World water and food to 2025: dealing with scarcity. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman D, Agard J, Alcamo J (2007) Chapter 9: The future today. In: Global Environmental Outlook 4 (GEO-4). United Nations Environment Programme, Progress Press Ltd., Malta

    Google Scholar 

  • von Braun J (2007) When food makes fuel: Promises and challenges of biofuels for developing countries and for food security for the poor. Paper presented at the Crawford Fund Conference Biofuels, Energy and Agriculture: Powering towards world food security. Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2007) Commodity Price Data (Pink Sheet). http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTDAILYPROSPECTS/Resources/Pnk_0707.pdf. Accessed July 10, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Worldwatch Institute (2006) Biofuels for transportation: global potential and implications for sustainable agriculture and energy in the 21st century. Prepared for the German Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV) in coordination with the German Agency for Technical Cooperation (GTZ) and the German Agency of Renewable Resources (FNR). Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siwa Msangi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Msangi, S., Ewing, M., Rosegrant, M.W., Zhu, T. (2010). Biofuels, Food Security, and the Environment: A 2020/2050 Perspective. In: Ringler, C., Biswas, A., Cline, S. (eds) Global Change: Impacts on Water and food Security. Water Resources Development and Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04615-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics