Reliability Analysis for the Advanced Electric Power Grid: From Cyber Control and Communication to Physical Manifestations of Failure

  • Ayman Z. Faza
  • Sahra Sedigh
  • Bruce M. McMillin
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5775)


The advanced electric power grid is a cyber-physical system comprised of physical components, such as transmission lines and generators, and a network of embedded systems deployed for their cyber control. The objective of this paper is to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze the reliability of this cyber-physical system. The original contribution of the approach lies in the scope of failures analyzed, which crosses the cyber-physical boundary by investigating physical manifestations of failures in cyber control. As an example of power electronics deployed to enhance and control the operation of the grid, we study Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS) devices, which are used to alter the flow of power on specific transmission lines. Through prudent fault injection, we enumerate the failure modes of FACTS devices, as triggered by their embedded software, and evaluate their effect on the reliability of the device and the reliability of the power grid on which they are deployed. The IEEE118 bus system is used as our case study, where the physical infrastructure is supplemented with seven FACTS devices to prevent the occurrence of four previously documented potential cascading failures.


reliability analysis failure propagation cyber-physical  power grid FACTS devices 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Chowdhury, B.H., Baravc, S.: Creating cascading failure scenarios in interconnected power systems. In: IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (June 2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lininger, A., McMillin, B., Crow, M., Chowdhury, B.: Use of max-flow on FACTS devices. In: North American Power Symposium (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Faza, A., Sedigh, S., McMillin, B.: Reliability Modeling for the Advanced Electric Power Grid. In: Saglietti, F., Oster, N. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4680, pp. 370–383. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Faza, A., Sedigh, S., McMillin, B.: The Advanced Electric Power Grid: Complexity Reduction Techniques for Reliability Modeling. In: Harrison, M.D., Sujan, M.-A. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5219, pp. 429–439. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rinaldi, S., Peerenboom, J., Kelly, T.: Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 11(6), 11–25 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee, E.E., Mitchell, J., Wallace, W.: Assessing vulnerability of proposed designs for interdependent infrastructure systems. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (January 2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh, C., Lago-Gonzalez, A.: Reliability Modeling of Generation Systems Including Unconventional Energy Sources. IEEE Transactiosn on Power Apparatus and Systems PAS-104(5), 1049–1056 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Endrenyi, J., Bhavaraju, M., Clements, K., Dhir, K., McCoy, M., Medicherla, K., Reppen, N., Salvaderi, L., Shahidehpour, S., Singh, C., Stratton, J.: Bulk Power System Reliability Concepts and Applications. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 3(1), 109–117 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laprie, J.C., Kanoun, K., Kaaniche, M.: Modelling interdependencies between the electricity and information infrastructures. In: Saglietti, F., Oster, N. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4680, pp. 54–67. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dondossola, G., Garrone, F., Szanto, J., Fiorenza, G.: Emerging Information Technology Scenarios for the Control and Management of the Distribution Grid. In: Proc. of the 19th Int’l Conf. on Electricity Distribution (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Geer, D.: Security of Critical Control Systems Sparks Concern. Computer 39(1), 20–23 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rigole, T., Vanthournout, K., Deconinck, G.: Interdependencies Between an Electric Power Infrastructure with Distributed Control, and the Underlying ICT Infrastructure. In: Proc. of Int’ Workshop on Complex Network and Infrastructure Protection (CNIP 2006), Rome, Italy, March 2006, pp. 428–440 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Deconinck, G., Belmans, R., Driesem, J., Nauwelaers, B., Lil, E.V.: Reaching for 100% Reliable Electricity Services: Multi-system Interactions and Fundamental Solutions. In: Proc. of the DIGESEC-CRIS Workshop 2006 Influence of Distributed Generation and Renewable Generation on Power Systemm Security, Magdeburg, Germany (December 2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ten, C.W., Liu, C.C., Govindarasu, M.: Vulnerability Assessment of Cybersecurity for SCADA Systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems (to appear, 2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stott, D.T., Ries, G., Hsueh, M.C., Iyer, R.K.: Dependability Analysis of a High-Speed Network Using Software-Implemented Fault Injection and Simulated Fault Injection. IEEE Transactions on Computers 47(1), 108–119 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arlat, J., Aguera, M., Amat, L., Crouzet, Y., Martins, E., Powell, D.: Fault Injection for Dependability Validation: A Methodology and Some Applications. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 16(2), 166–182 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Armbruster, A., Gosnell, M., McMillin, B., Crow, M.L.: Power transmission control using distributed max flow. In: Proc. of the 29th Annual Int’l Computer Software and Applications Conf (COMPSAC 2005), Washington, DC, USA, pp. 256–263. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ayman Z. Faza
    • 1
  • Sahra Sedigh
    • 1
  • Bruce M. McMillin
    • 1
  1. 1.Missouri University of Science and TechnologyRollaUSA

Personalised recommendations